Evaluating the External Environment
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 1 of 14
Discussion Board 1 Main Thread
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 50 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Introduction provides an complete overview of the discussion
1.1 to 3 points Introduction provides an partial overview of the discussion
0.1 to 1 points Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion
0 points Not completed
Process 15 Points
13.1 to 15 points Section provides a complete discussion of the required business process topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of process steps. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the required business process. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include analysis of process steps. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 5 points Section is present but misses many elements of the required business process. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Strategic Thinking 15 Points
13.1 to 15 points Section provides a complete discussion of the required strategic thinking topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of topic. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the required strategic thinking topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 5 points Section is present but misses many elements of the required strategic thinking topic. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis, evaluation, or synthesis.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Decision Model 10 Points
8.1 to 10 points Section provides a complete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). Complete discussion of how the model(s) aid or hinder the student’s decision process to include why. Flow is
3.1 to 8 points Section provides a complete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). Minimal discussion of how the model(s) aid or hinder the student’s decision process to include why. Flow is
0.1 to 3 points Section provides an incomplete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). No discussion of how the model(s) aid or hinder the student’s decision process to include why. No less than minimum
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 2 of 14
logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
required word count.
Conclusion 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points
1.1 to 3 points Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key points
0.1 to 1 points Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points
0 points Not completed
Structure ‐ 25 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present Annotated Bibliography
20 Points 16.1 to 20 points
Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Evaluation of the quality of the publication. Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
6.1 to 16 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing or partial: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 6 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing one or more: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0 points Not completed
APA Format & Structure 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points
Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points
Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the
required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points No cover page and/or section
headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 3 of 14
Discussion Board 1 Reply
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 20 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Summary 8 Points
6.1 to 8 points Section provides a complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
2.1 to 6 points Section provides a nearly complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 2 points Section is present but misses many elements of the author’s main thread.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Evaluation 12 Points
9.1 to 12 points Section provides a complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with and why as well as what the student disagreed with and why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
3.1 to 9 points Section provides a nearly complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with or disagreed with. Limited or no discussion of why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis of the topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 3 points Section is present but provides a weak evaluation of the author’s paper without any discussion of what the student disagreed with or why. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis or evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Structure ‐ 5 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present APA Format & Structure
5 Points 3.1 to 5 points
Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points Two sources (not the text books) not included and/or incorrect reference listing. No cover page and/or section headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 4 of 14
Discussion Board 2 ‐ 5 Main Thread
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 50 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Introduction provides an complete overview of the discussion
1.1 to 3 points Introduction provides an partial overview of the discussion
0.1 to 1 points Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion
0 points Not completed
Process 15 Points
13.1 to 15 points Section provides a complete discussion of the required business process topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of process steps. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the required business process. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include analysis of process steps. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 5 points Section is present but misses many elements of the required business process. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Strategic Thinking 15 Points
13.1 to 15 points Section provides a complete discussion of the required strategic thinking topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of topic. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the required strategic
thinking topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required
word count.
0.1 to 5 points Section is present but misses many elements of the required strategic thinking topic. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis, evaluation, or
synthesis.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Decision Model 10 Points
8.1 to 10 points Section provides a complete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). Complete discussion of decision model(s) being considered to include why. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word
3.1 to 8 points Section provides a complete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). Minimal discussion of decision model(s) being considered to include why. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum
0.1 to 3 points Section provides an incomplete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). No discussion of decision model(s) being considered to include why. No less than minimum required word count.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 5 of 14
count.
required word count.
Conclusion 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points
1.1 to 3 points Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key points
0.1 to 1 points Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points
0 points Not completed
Structure ‐ 25 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present Annotated Bibliography 20 Points
16.1 to 20 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Evaluation of the quality of the publication. Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
6.1 to 16 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing or partial: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 6 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing one or more: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0 points Not completed
APA Format & Structure 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points
Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points
Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the
required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points No cover page and/or section
headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
Discussion Board 2 ‐ 5 Reply
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 6 of 14
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 20 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Summary 8 Points
6.1 to 8 points Section provides a complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
2.1 to 6 points Section provides a nearly complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 2 points Section is present but misses many elements of the author’s main thread.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Evaluation 12 Points
9.1 to 12 points Section provides a complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with and why as well as what the student disagreed with and why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
3.1 to 9 points Section provides a nearly complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with or disagreed with. Limited or no discussion of why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis of the topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 3 points Section is present but provides a weak evaluation of the author’s paper without any discussion of what the student disagreed with or why. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis or evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Structure ‐ 5 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present APA Format & Structure
5 Points 3.1 to 5 points
Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points Two sources (not the text books) not included and/or incorrect reference listing. No cover page and/or section headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 7 of 14
Discussion Board 6 Main Thread
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 50 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Introduction provides an complete overview of the discussion
1.1 to 3 points Introduction provides an partial overview of the discussion
0.1 to 1 points Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion
0 points Not completed
Process 15 Points
13.1 to 15 points Section provides a complete discussion of the required business process topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of process steps. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the required business process. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include analysis of process steps. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 5 points Section is present but misses many elements of the required business process. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Strategic Thinking 15 Points
13.1 to 15 points Section provides a complete discussion of the required strategic thinking topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of topic. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the required strategic thinking topic. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 5 points Section is present but misses many elements of the required strategic thinking topic. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis, evaluation, or synthesis.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Decision Model 10 Points
8.1 to 10 points Section provides a complete discussion of key decision traps to avoid to include why they are key. Flow is logical and fully cited.
No less than minimum required word count.
3.1 to 8 points Section provides a minimal discussion of key decision traps to avoid to include why they are key. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 3 points Section provides a minimal discussion of key decision traps to avoid and no discussion of why they are key. No less than minimum required word count.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 8 of 14
Conclusion 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points
1.1 to 3 points Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key points
0.1 to 1 points Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points
0 points Not completed
Structure ‐ 25 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present Annotated Bibliography 20 Points
16.1 to 20 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Evaluation of the quality of the publication. Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
6.1 to 16 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing or partial: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 6 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing one or more: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0 points Not completed
APA Format & Structure 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points
Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points
Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points No cover page and/or section headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 9 of 14
Discussion Board 6 Reply
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 20 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Summary 8 Points
6.1 to 8 points Section provides a complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
2.1 to 6 points Section provides a nearly complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 2 points Section is present but misses many elements of the author’s main thread.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Evaluation 12 Points
9.1 to 12 points Section provides a complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with and why as well as what the student disagreed with and why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
3.1 to 9 points Section provides a nearly complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with or disagreed with. Limited or no discussion of why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis of the topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 3 points Section is present but provides a weak evaluation of the author’s paper without any discussion of what the student disagreed with or why. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis or evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Structure ‐ 5 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present APA Format & Structure
5 Points 3.1 to 5 points
Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points Two sources (not the text books) not included and/or incorrect reference listing. No cover page and/or section headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 10 of 14
Discussion Board 7 Main Thread
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 75 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Introduction provides an complete overview of the discussion
1.1 to 3 points Introduction provides an partial overview of the discussion
0.1 to 1 points Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion
0 points Not completed
Business Integrity 20 Points
16.1 to 20 points Section provides a complete discussion of the power of business integrity. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of process steps. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
6.1 to 16 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the power of business integrity. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include analysis of process steps. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 6 points Section is present but misses many elements of the power of business integrity. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
God’s Perspective on Business Integrity
25 Points
18.1 to 25 points Section provides a complete discussion of God’s perspective on business integrity. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of process steps. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
8.1 to 18 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of God’s perspective on business integrity. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include analysis of process steps. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 8 points Section is present but misses many elements God’s perspective on business integrity. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Decision Model 20 Points
16.1 to 20 points Section provides a complete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). Complete discussion of the changes in the student’s decision model to include why. Flow is logical and fully cited.
6.1 to 16 points Section provides a complete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). Minimal discussion of the changes in the student’s decision model to include why. Flow is mostly logical and
0.1 to 6 points Section provides an incomplete discussion of the student’s current decision model(s). No discussion of the changes in the student’s decision model to include why. No less than minimum required word
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 11 of 14
No less than minimum required word count.
partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
count.
Conclusion 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points
1.1 to 3 points Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key points
0.1 to 1 points Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points
0 points Not completed
Structure ‐ 25 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present Annotated Bibliography 20 Points
16.1 to 20 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Evaluation of the quality of the publication. Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
6.1 to 16 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing or partial: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 6 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Summary of Key Points in the article. Missing one or more: 1) Evaluation of the quality of the publication. 2) Evaluation of the quality of the author(s). 3) Description of where the article fits into the discussion. No less than minimum required word count.
0 points Not completed
APA Format & Structure 5 Points
3.1 to 5 points Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points Proper cover page and section
headings included. Met most of the required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points No cover page and/or section
headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 12 of 14
Discussion Board 7 Reply
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 20 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Summary 8 Points
6.1 to 8 points Section provides a complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
2.1 to 6 points Section provides a nearly complete summary of the author’s main thread. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 2 points Section is present but misses many elements of the author’s main thread.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Evaluation 12 Points
9.1 to 12 points Section provides a complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with and why as well as what the student disagreed with and why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis and evaluation of the author’s main thread. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than minimum required word count.
3.1 to 9 points Section provides a nearly complete evaluation of the author’s paper to include what the student agreed with or disagreed with. Limited or no discussion of why. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis of the topic. Flow is mostly logical and partially cited. No less than minimum required word count.
0.1 to 3 points Section is present but provides a weak evaluation of the author’s paper without any discussion of what the student disagreed with or why. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis or evaluation.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Structure ‐ 5 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present APA Format & Structure
5 Points 3.1 to 5 points
Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met all of the required formatting.
1.1 to 3 points Two sources included (not the text books). Correct reference listing. Proper cover page and section headings included. Met most of the required formatting.
0.1 to 1 points Two sources (not the text books) not included and/or incorrect reference listing. No cover page and/or section headings included. Met all of some required formatting.
0 points No structure or formatting provided
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 13 of 14
Literature Review
Criteria Levels of Achievement Content ‐ 220 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction 10 Points
8.1 to 10 points Introduction provides a clear theme and a complete overview of the literature review
4.1 to 8 points Introduction provides a weak theme and / or a partial overview of the literature review
0.1 to 4 points Introduction present but does not provide a clear theme and / or an overview of the literature review
0 points Not completed
Research Question 1 65 Points
60.1 to 65 points Section provides a complete discussion of how individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making. Compares and contrasts multiple views. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than 8 pages in length with no less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
30.1 to 60 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of how individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making. Fails to compare and contrast multiple views. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include some analysis and evaluation. Flow is mostly logical and mostly cited. No less than 8 pages in length with no less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
0.1 to 30 points Section is present but misses many elements of how individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making. Fails to compare and contrast multiple views. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation. Flow is not logical and / or poorly cited. Less than 8 pages in length and / or less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Research Question 2 65 Points
60.1 to 65 points Section provides a complete discussion of the newest directions in the process of strategy development and execution. Compares and contrasts multiple views. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than 8 pages in length with no less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
30.1 to 60 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of the newest directions in the process of strategy development and execution. Fails to compare and contrast multiple views. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include some analysis and evaluation. Flow is mostly logical and mostly cited. No less than 8 pages in length with no less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
0.1 to 30 points Section is present but misses many elements of the newest directions in the process of strategy development and execution. Fails to compare and contrast multiple views. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation. Flow is not logical and / or poorly cited. Less than 8 pages in length and / or less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 14 of 14
Research Question 3 65 Points
60.1 to 65 points Section provides a complete discussion of how the student’s academic discipline, as a function within the organization, impacts the process of business strategy development and execution. Compares and contrasts multiple views. Demonstrates critical thinking to include analysis, evaluation, and synthesis. Flow is logical and fully cited. No less than 8 pages in length with no less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
30.1 to 60 points Section provides a nearly complete discussion of how the student’s academic discipline, as a function within the organization, impacts the process of business strategy development and execution. Fails to compare and contrast multiple views. Demonstrates some critical thinking to include some analysis and evaluation. Flow is mostly logical and mostly cited. No less than 8 pages in length with no less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
0.1 to 30 points Section is present but misses many elements of how the student’s academic discipline, as a function within the organization, impacts the process of business strategy development and execution. Fails to compare and contrast multiple views. Lacks appropriate level of critical thinking with very little or no analysis and evaluation. Flow is not logical and / or poorly cited. Less than 8 pages in length and / or less than 6 scholarly sources not including the texts.
0 points Not completed or not related to requirements for the section
Conclusion 15 Points
12.1 to 15 points Conclusion provides a complete summary of the literature review and highlights key points from each section.
6.1 to 12 points Conclusion provides a partial summary of the literature review and highlights key points from at least two sections.
0.1 to 6 points Conclusion present but does not summarize the literature review and / or highlight key points.
0 points Not completed
Structure ‐ 25 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present APA Format &
Structure
22.1 to 25 points Proper cover page. Level one headings for introduction, research questions, and conclusion. Minimum of two levels of headings within each research question. One inch margins, double spaced, 12 point font. Table of Contents to include all level one and level two headings. Properly formatted reference section APA Formatting throughout.
11.1 to 22 points Proper cover page. Level one headings for introduction, research questions, and conclusion. One inch margins, double spaced, 12 point font. Table of Contents to include all level one headings. Properly formatted reference section APA Formatting throughout.
0.1 to 11 points Cover page. No Table of Contents and/or section headings included. Met some required formatting.
0 points Minimal structure and / or formatting provided