|
Organization
|
Extremely well organized
Introduces the purpose of the paper clearly, with specific details of the content
Presents information in a logical, interesting sequence which reader can follow
Ends with an accurate conclusion showing thoughtful, strong evaluation of the information presented
|
Generally well organized
Introduces the purpose of the paper clearly, with some details
Most information presented in a logical sequence; a few minor points may be confusing
Ends with summary of main points showing some evaluation of the information presented
|
Somewhat organized
Introduces the purpose of the paper, with little or no details
Paper jumps around topics. Several points are confusing
Ends with a summary or conclusion. Very little evidence of evaluating the information presented
|
Poor or non- existent organization
Does not clearly introduce the purpose of the paper
Paper is choppy and disjointed; no apparent logical order of material
Ends without a summary or conclusion
|
|
Content/Depth of Research
|
Paper provides an accurate and complete explanation of key concepts and theories, drawing upon relevant literature.
Provides evidence of extensive and valid research with multiple and varied sources
Information completely accurate; all names and facts were precise and explicit
|
For the most part, explanations of concepts and theories are accurate and complete
Presents evidence of valid research with multiple sources.
No significant errors are made; a few inconsistencies or errors in information
|
Explanations of concepts and theories are inaccurate or incomplete. There is a great deal of information that is not connected to the topic.
Presents evidence of research with sources.
Enough errors are made to distract a knowledgeable reader, but some information is accurate.
|
No reference is made to literature or theory. Topic is not clear; information included that does not support the topic in any way
Presents little or no evidence of valid research
Information included is sufficiently inaccurate that the reader cannot depend on the paper as a source of accurate information
|
|
Mechanics
|
Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors
|
May contain a few errors which annoy the reader but not impede understanding
|
Contains several mechanical errors which may temporarily confuse the reader, but not impede the overall understanding
|
Contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader’s understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts
|
|
Style
|
Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentences are varied and carefully focused, not long and rambling
|
Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may sometimes be too general. Sentences generally clear and well structured, though some may be awkward
|
Uses relatively vague and general words; may use some inappropriate language. Sentence structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, repetitive or confusing
|
May be too vague and abstract. Contains several awkward and ungrammatical sentences. Sentence structure is simple or monotonous.
|