|
Criteria
|
No Evidence
|
Unsatisfactory
|
Emerging
|
Proficient
|
Exemplary
|
|
Student provided a detailed analysis of what charges may be brought against each person and supported their response with legal reason.
40 points
|
Student did not submit assignment
(0 points)
|
Work does not meet assignment expectations; shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts
(10 points)
|
Assignment partially meets expectations with minimal depth; demonstrates a limited understanding of the assignment concepts.
(20 points)
|
Assignment meets expectations with all components being addressed; demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignments concepts
(30 points)
|
Assignment exceeds expectations with exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts
(40 points)
|
|
Student provided a detailed analysis of what defenses may be asserted for each person and supported their response with legal reason.
40 points
|
Student did not submit assignment
(0 points)
|
Work does not meet assignment expectations; shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts
(10 points)
|
Assignment partially meets expectations with minimal depth; demonstrates a limited understanding of the assignment concepts.
(20 points)
|
Assignment meets expectations with all components being addressed; demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignments concepts
(30 points)
|
Assignment exceeds expectations with exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts
(40 points)
|
|
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation
10 points
|
Student did not submit assignment
(0 Points)
|
Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension
(1-3 points)
|
Submission contains some incoherent or inconsistent presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent
(4-6 points)
|
The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated; there may be errors in basic writing conventions, but these do not interfere with reader comprehension
(7-9points)
|
The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free
(10 points)
|
|
Used APA or Bluebook citations and references, and used correct structural formatting
10 points
|
Student did not submit assignment
(0 Points)
|
No attempt at APA or Bluebook was used when using references
(1-3 points)
|
APA or Bluebook is attempted with numerous errors
(4-6 points)
|
Using APA or Bluebook, accurately; errors are noticeable but minor
(7-9points)
|
Using APA or Bluebook proficiently; text is basically error free
(10 points)
|