Stressors that affect time management

Criteria

Achievement Level

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Depth of Reflection

(50 points)

0 - 29

Response does not consider the theories, concepts, and/or strategies. Viewpoints and interpretations are unclear.

30 - 34

Response reflects a lack of consideration or personalization of the theories, concepts, and/or strategies. Viewpoints and interpretations may be missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported.

35 - 39

Response reflects minimal consideration and personalization of the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented. Viewpoints and interpretations may be unsupported or supported with flawed arguments.

40 - 44

Response reflects some consideration and personalization of the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented. Most viewpoints and interpretations are supported; some may be fairly insightful.

45 - 50

Response reflects in-depth consideration and personalization of the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and supported.

Writing Mechanics

(10 points)

0 - 5

Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. Serious problems with sentence structure and grammar. Numerous major or minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

6 - 6

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness. Minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors. Several minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

7 - 7

Writing is somewhat clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are adequate and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

8 - 8

Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

9 - 10

Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors.

Components

(15 points)

0 - 8

The response veers off topic and fails to address the components.

9 - 10

The response does a poor job of addressing the following major components or does not address them: • accurate accounts of the topic area, • critical analysis of the topic area, and • scholarly or professional application of the topic area.

11 - 11

The response addresses some but excludes one or more of the major components: • accurate accounts of the topic area, • critical analysis of the topic area, and • scholarly or professional application of the topic area.

12 - 13

The response addresses most of the major components, but one component is incomplete or insufficient: • accurate accounts of the topic area, • critical analysis of the topic area, and • scholarly or professional application of the topic area.

14 - 15

The response includes all of the major components: • accurate accounts of the topic area, • critical analysis of the topic area, and • scholarly or professional application of the topic area.

Identification of Future Learning Opportunities

(25 points)

0 - 14

Response does not identify any future learning opportunities.

15 - 17

Response demonstrates little to no synthesis of the ideas presented. Few or no insights for the learner’s future learning are noted.

18 - 19

Response demonstrates some synthesis of the ideas presented. Few implications of these insights for the learner’s future learning may be noted.

20 - 22

Response demonstrates a fair synthesis of the ideas presented. Nearly all implications of these insights for the learner’s future learning are noted.

23 - 25

Response demonstrates synthesis of ideas presented. The implications of these insights for the learner’s future learning are noted.