Policy powerpoint presentation

shiley4
Gradingforthisassignmentwillbebasedonanswerquality.docx

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 140

Assignment 3: Policy Position Presentation

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Provide a brief overview of your selected issue.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief overview of your selected issue.

Partially provided a brief overview of your selected issue.

Satisfactorily provided a brief overview of your selected issue.

Thoroughly provided a brief overview of your selected issue.

2. Use statistical evidence to support your position, and validate your position with peer-reviewed references. Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely used statistical evidence to support your position, and did not submit or incompletely validated your position with peer-reviewed references.

Partially used statistical evidence to support your position, and partially validated your position with peer-reviewed references.

Satisfactorily used statistical evidence to support your position, and satisfactorily validated your position with peer-reviewed references.

Thoroughly used statistical evidence to support your position, and thoroughly validated your position with peer-reviewed references.

3. Examine the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue.

Partially examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue.

Satisfactorily examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue.

Thoroughly examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue.

4. Identify the stakeholders.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the stakeholders.

Partially identified the stakeholders.

Satisfactorily identified the stakeholders.

Thoroughly identified the stakeholders.

5. Evaluate the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and suggest two (2) courses of action.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) courses of action.

Partially evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and partially suggested two (2) courses of action.

Satisfactorily evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and satisfactorily suggested two (2) courses of action.

Thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and thoroughly suggested two (2) courses of action.

6. Supply a narrative in the note section of each information slide describing what the student would say if he or she were presenting in person.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely included a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

Partially provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

Satisfactorily provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

Thoroughly provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide.

7. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

9. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

10. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

 

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

11. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

 

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.