|
Content:Chooses and provides a thorough cost analysis of two similar pieces of equipment.
|
Equipment is identified, purpose of equipment is identified and discussed, uses at least 5 points of cost comparison to assess lifetime costs, clearly decides which purchase is most beneficial, summarizes why beneficial.
|
Equipment and purpose identified, uses at least 3 points of cost comparison to assess lifetime costs, clearly decides which purchase is most beneficial, summarizes why beneficial.
|
Equipment identified, uses 3 or less points of cost comparison to assess lifetime costs, clearly notes which equipment is better purchase.
|
Equipment identified and cost comparison provided using less than 3 unique points of comparison.
|
|
|
Interaction:Individual progress is described and suitable for the stage of the project and is not challenged by fellow group members.
|
Initial post made and interacted with classmates, enabling discussion and further analysis of selected equipment
OR
No other classmates posted.
|
Initial post made and interacted with classmates, providing commentary or perspective without enabling further discussion.
|
Initial post made, but no interaction with classmates
|
|
|
|
Mechanics
|
Posts and responses are well-organized, clear, professionally written (no text-speak), and free of spelling and grammatical errors.
|
Posts and responses are written clearly with minor errors in organization, spelling or grammar. They are clear, concise and professionally communicated.
|
Posts and responses contain several errors in spelling, grammar or organization that make the main points unclear. Professionalism in communication could be improved.
|
.
|
|