Assignment 2 Non consequentialethicalanalysis
Marking criteria
|
Grade/ Criteria |
Fail |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High distinction
|
|
Depth of research. |
Heavy reliance on unit text & study guide; & low quality websites. Journal articles selected – insufficient, poor quality or irrelevant. |
Inadequate range or irrelevant academic references. Heavy reliance on unit text & study guide. |
Reasonable range of quality and relevant academic references selected.
|
Good range of quality and relevant books &journal articles selected. Reliable websites used where necessary. |
Extensive range of relevant, high quality journal articles& books selected. Only high quality & reputable websites used. |
|
Application of theory. |
Fail to use relevant theories in performing assessment task. |
Identify & apply minimal theory to assessment task. |
Select some relevant theories & demonstrate understanding of its application to the assessment task. |
Successfully apply relevant theories to assessment task. |
Identify most relevant theories & successfully apply to assessment task. |
|
Analysis & interpretation of information. |
No constructive analysis of information. Discussion is disjointed. Inappropriate subheadings. |
Demonstrate comprehension of information collected applying basic analysis which lacks depth. |
Good analysis and interpretation of information with logical conclusions drawn. |
Logical structure using relevant subheadings providing a coherent response to the assessment task. |
Logical structure linking rational & coherent argument, demonstrating depth of knowledge. |
|
Synthesis, problem solving & creativity. |
Unable to connect information to solve the problem. |
Elementary connection of relevant theory & practice. No genuine solution provided. |
Information drawn together to produce obvious conclusions with cursory link to assessment problem. |
Logical solution created from synthesis of information presented. |
Relevant information drawn together to provide insightful solution to assessment problem. |
|
Clarity of expression & grammar; accurate referencing. |
Extensive spelling and/or grammatical errors.Quotedmaterial presented incorrectly. Incorrect & inaccurate referencing. Disjointed & fragmented flow of expression.
|
Expression flows well,but is disjointed in someplaces. Some spelling and/or grammatical errors. Referencing not entirely correct. |
Few spelling and/orgrammatical errors. Paraphrasing correctlyportrays ideas in ownwords. Expression flows well. |
Clear flow of expression with accurate referencing and few grammatical or spelling errors. |
Excellent expression using appropriate academic language. Precise referencing. Very few grammatical or spelling errors. |