WK 8 questions
Chapter 13
Managing Alliances &
Joint Ventures
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
13-2
Integrating Chemco
Independently run local business
History of profitable growth with little (HRM) involvement from US parent
Despite the relative success, poor integration with other subsidiaries became a serious business problem
Questions:
What can the US parent do to increase its influence in the JV & improve coordination with its affiliates in Asia?
How can HR contribute to changing the culture of the JV organization?
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
13-3
Patterns Of Global Competition
Need for fast market entry
Need for low cost and flexibility
Need to reduce risks and uncertainty
Need to master new capabilities
Globalization of markets
Increasing use of strategic alliances
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
3
13-4
Why Do Many Alliances Fail?
Strategic issues
Poorly conceived alliance - two losers can’t win!
Lack of shared long-term objectives
Changing parent strategies or priorities
One parent achieves goals, the other is left behind
Operational issues
Poor management of the alliance process
Perceived unfairness - transfer prices, fees, etc.
“Cultural differences” overwhelming
Too slow - fails to deliver in the market
Even well-designed alliances are frequently difficult to manage
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
4
13-5
Alliance Strategy Context
Competition vs. Collaboration
Low vs. High capability/knowledge creation
| Strategic context: |
| Are the long-term interests of the alliance partners complementary or (potentially) in competition? |
| Learning context: |
| Some alliances rely mainly on exploitation of existing capabilities, others generate new capabilities |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
5
13-6
A Strategy Framework for International Alliances
Low
High
Complementary
Competitive
Opportunities for capability/ knowledge creation
Long-term strategic context
Complementary
Alliance
Learning
Alliance
Competitive
Alliance
Resource Alliance
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
6
Alliances can be evaluated on two dimensions. The first reflects the competitive context of the alliance. The second dimension reflects the need and opportunities for knowledge-creation.
A It is important to bear in mind that the strategic interests can change over time, and that what was once a collaborative relationship may turn into a fierce competition or conflict. A common experience of many Western firms with their joint ventures in Japan and two decades later in China are often-cited examples in this regard (Reich and Mankin, 1986; Hamel et al., 1989; McGregor, 2005; Hamilton and Zhang, 2008)
B In principle, all alliances have the potential to generate new knowledge—at least partners can learn about each other, and how to work together—the difference is in the intensity of the knowledge-creation process.
13-7
Imperatives of Alliance Strategies
| Management process should match strategic position |
| Alliance capabilities may not transfer well across different types of alliances |
| Even the best-written contract cannot substitute for strategic leverage |
| There is no generic alliance strategy Strategic position will most likely shift over time Alliance positioning is not a unilateral decision |
Therefore:
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
7
13-8
Alliance is a Process, Not a Deal
| There are no structural solutions to the inevitable tensions |
| Strategic, organizational, cultural conflicts difficult to separate |
| Learning organization is the best defence |
| People Management is a critical component of most successful alliances |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
8
13-9
HRM Issues in Strategic Alliances
| Key contribution : building organizational capability to implement alliance strategy |
| Aligning HR practices with alliance long-term strategy |
| Managing loyalty, trust, influence |
| Promoting organizational learning |
| Early involvement is essential – starting with partner selection and negotiations |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
9
13-10
The HR Alliance Strategy Plan: Partner Selection and Negotiations
| HRM issues that may influence partner selection Desired competencies that a partner should possess Need for venture HR support from the partner Assessment of HR skills & reputation of potential partners Assessment of the organizational culture of potential partners Exit options |
| Venture HR issues that must be resolved in negotiation Management philosophy, notably concerning HRM Staffing: sourcing & criteria Performance management & compensation Who will provide what HR service support |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
10
13-11
The HR Alliance Strategy Plan: Continued
| Desired negotiation outcomes & possible bargaining trade-offs. Specific HRM activities: early implementation Negotiation stage Negotiation team selection Negotiation training Start-up stage Staffing decisions Alliance management training |
| Allocating of responsibility: Corporate responsibility Local management team responsibility Partner responsibility |
| Measurements to evaluate quality of HR support Recruitment target Training delivered Skill/knowledge transferred |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
11
13-12
Selecting Partners
Main challenges:
Desired contribution of the partner?
How much will partner HR systems interface within alliance?
Always include the partner’s HR philosophy, policies, practices, and culture when considering the choice of an alliance partner…
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
13-13
| Alliance Manager Roles and Responsibilities |
| Building interpersonal trust Unless there is trust and the right chemistry, the alliance will fail |
| Monitoring partner contributions Meeting obligations is the most tangible evidence of commitment |
| Managing information flow & learning Drawing the line between information flow that ensures alliance vitality and unbridled information exchange |
| Assessing strategic viability/evaluating synergy The strategic needs of the firm change over time; what are the implications for the alliance and the overall relationship |
| Aligning internal relationships Alliance manager must mobilize support across the organization |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
Table 13-2
13
13-14
| Venture Manager Roles and Responsibilities |
| Managing the business The venture manager has the operational responsibility for the success of the venture |
| Representing venture interest The venture manager has to represent without bias the interest of the venture as a business vis-à-vis its parents Aligning outside resources Tapping into resources located outside the venture boundaries Building collaborative culture Irrespective of the competitive context of the alliance, trust inside the venture is an essential ingredient for success Developing venture strategy Successful alliances evolve as any other ongoing business |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
14
13-15
Selecting Alliance Managers
Credibility inside own company
Good listener and communicator
Ability to take a strategic perspective
Strong people and cross-cultural skills
Sensitivity to anticipate other points of view
High tolerance for ambiguity, frustration, and conflict
High level of integrity – always delivers on promises made
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
15
13-16
Alliance Negotiations
Factors influencing the alliance HRM framework
Shared control vs. dominant control – who is in charge?
Alliance autonomy or dependence on the parent(s)
Internal HR competence within the alliance
Trust among partners
Key people issues in alliance venture negotiations
Board composition
Senior management appointments
HR policies for the venture: Which direction?
What is important: Equity control vs. operational influence?
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
13-17
HRM issues in Managing the Alliance
| Staffing the alliance |
| Mobility between the parent(s) and the venture |
| Competence and capability development |
| Performance management |
| Rewards and recognition |
| Building influence inside the alliance |
| Aligning the social architecture |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
17
13-18
Staffing Alliances
| Monitor high quality of staff; alliances are challenging – no room for second-string players |
| Manage your partner’s staffing – essential to intervene before a “wrong” decision is made |
| Find roles for venture champions |
| Benefits of dedicated management teams – stability |
| Avoid “one-person” JV operations, especially in competitive alliances |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
18
“
13-19
Developing Capabilities
Creating a learning environment
Train employees & managers dispatched to alliance
- Cross-cultural training
- Conflict resolution
Enhance collaboration inside the partnership
- Accept diversity: adjust cultural norms
Facilitate integration with the parent firm
Integrate through interaction: business teams/task forces
Training as a good tool for social integration
Attention to long-term career objectives
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
19
13-21
Defining Performance
Managing performance = the key to having an influence
Sources of tensions in PM
Different objectives may mean different criteria for high/low performance
Different standards for different employee groups
Should managers be evaluated on performance of the JV or the parent?
Creating leverage through performance management
Parent objectives should be reflected in alliance performance targets
Achieving these targets has to be measured
Meeting or failing to meet these targets has to have consequences
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
20
13-21
Aligning Rewards
No compensation formula or measurement can overcome disagreement about strategy…
Issues to consider:
Tension between external equity with parent
Internal equity for venture staff
Working conditions favoring JV
Incentives for sharing knowledge
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
21
13-22
Building Influence
Senior management in the parent must stay visibly engaged
Quality of “ambassadors” to alliance is the foundation for building influence
Essential step: Involvement & commitment in career development
Local staff – leveraging opportunities at the parent firm
Dispatched employees - managing dual allegiance
Linkage to performance management: rewards & recognition
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
13-23
Developing a Shared Culture
| Conflicting loyalties may be inevitable – within an agreed-on framework, they should be acknowledged and respected |
| Alliance independence is not a goal in itself – the culture of the venture must fit the business strategy |
| Successful alliances have cultures that are focused on the market and the customer |
| The key outcome of shared culture is TRUST – no partnership strategy will succeed without trust at the operating level |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
23
13-24
The Role of Organizational Learning
All alliances included some learning aspects
The ability to learn through alliances can be a source of competitive advantage
Recognition of learning as a competitive tool
Control = race to learn
Need to preserve learning parity (at least)
Best strategy: Learn your partner's competencies - and expect your partner to do the same
Learning depends on the ability to transfer and integrate tacit knowledge
HRM is critical for alliance learning
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
24
13-25
Obstacles to Alliance Learning
| Low Priority of Alliance Learning |
| Inappropriate Staffing |
| Poor Climate for Knowledge Exchange |
| HRM Foundation for Effective Alliance Learning |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
25
13-26
Core Principles for Alliance Learning
| Build learning into alliance agreement |
| 2. Communicate learning intent inside the parent |
| 3. Assign responsibility for alliance learning |
| 4. Secure early HR involvement |
| 5. Maintain HR influence inside the alliance |
| 6. Staff to learn |
| 7. Support learning-driven careers, including repatriation |
| 8. Stimulate learning through training |
| 9. Reward learning activities |
| 10. Monitor your partner’s learning |
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
26
13-27
Implementing Successful Partnerships
Start with a strategy – not with a partner
Alliances are mostly transitional entities; longevity is a poor measure of success
The myth of alliance governance: Control comes from ownership/contractual rights
Influence comes from contribution to the business
Respect, fairness and collaborative mindset are essential; so is strategic vigilance
Offensive, externally-focused alliances work best
© Evans, Pucik, Björkman 2010
The Global Challenge
27