FR2003

Porcha
FR2003_Rubric.pdf

©2016 Walden University 1

FR2003: Family Relationships: Analyze strategies for fostering caring relationships with families.

Assessment Rubric

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

Topic 1: Fostering Caring and Meaningful Relationships with Families

A brief introduction explaining why caring and meaningful partnerships between staff and families are vital to all involved. LO 1: Explain the importance of caring and meaningful staff-family partnerships

Response is not present.

Explanation of why caring and meaningful staff-family partnerships are vital to all involved is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.

Explanation of why caring and meaningful staff-family partnerships are vital to all involved is clear, accurate, and complete.

Analyze evidence-

based resources in

order to suggest

research-based

strategies that help

foster caring and

meaningful

partnerships between

staff and families.

LO2: Analyze research- based resources in order suggest strategies that help foster caring and

Response is not present.

Strategies that foster caring and meaningful partnerships between staff and families are vague, not research-based, and/or incomplete.

Response clearly, accurately, and completely analyzes research- based strategies that foster caring and meaningful partnerships between staff and families.

©2016 Walden University 2

meaningful partnerships between staff and families.

Analyze evidence- based resources in order to suggest at least three questions designed to elicit input from staff on key concepts for building strong and supportive staff-family partnerships. LO3: Analyze evidence- based resources in order to suggest questions that elicit input on key concepts related to building strong and supportive staff-family partnerships.

Response is not present.

Questions that elicit input on key concepts related to building strong and supportive staff-family partnerships are vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.

Questions are clear, accurate, and evidence-based as well as elicit input on key concepts related to building strong and supportive staff-family partnerships

Topic 2: Communicating with Families

Analyze evidence- based resources in

Response is not present.

Questions directed to families to foster communication

Questions directed to families to foster communication between

©2016 Walden University 3

order to suggest at least two questions for staff to pose to families that foster communication between families and staff. LO1: Analyze evidence- based resources in order to suggest questions for staff to pose to families that foster communication.

between staff and families are vague, not respectful, and/or incomplete.

staff and families are evidence- based, clear, respectful, and complete.

A brief summary of and a citation/link to a recommended article that you would like staff to read before the next workshop, which will be on strengthening staff- family communication. LO2: Summarize and cite relevant articles on strengthening staff- family communication.

Response is not present.

Summary and citation of recommended article on strengthening family-staff communication are vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.

Response clearly, accurately, and completely summarizes and cites a recommended article on strengthening staff-family communication.

©2016 Walden University 4

Exceeds Expectations: In-Depth Analysis

LO1: Use in-depth information from multiple, current, and relevant sources focused on building strong partnerships with families.

PowerPoint presentation provides in-depth, current, and relevant information that elicits critical thinking and analysis of key concepts related to the importance of building strong, supportive staff-family partnerships.

 Yes

 No

Professional Skill Rubrics

Written Communication: Write with clarity, coherence, and purpose. 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

LO1: Construct complete and correct sentences (AWE 2; Sentence Level Skills)

Sentences are incoherent and impede reader’s access to ideas.

Sentences are incomplete and/or include fragments and run-on sentences, limiting reader’s access to ideas.

Sentences structure effectively conveys meaning to the reader.

©2016 Walden University 5

LO2: Demonstrate the effective use of grammar and mechanics. (AWE 2; Sentence Level Skills)

Multiple inaccuracies in grammar and mechanics impede reader’s access to ideas.

Some inaccuracies in grammar and mechanics limit reader’s access to ideas.

Use of grammar and mechanics is straightforward and effectively conveys meaning to reader.

LO3: Create cohesive paragraphs with a clear central idea. (AWE 2; Paragraph Level Skills)

Paragraphs, or lack of paragraphs, impede reader’s access to ideas.

Construction of main idea and/or supporting paragraphs limit reader’s access to ideas.

Main idea and/or supporting paragraphs effectively convey meaning to reader.

LO4: Use supporting material to support a claim. (AWE 2; Use of Evidence)

Supporting materials are not present.

Supporting material is used inconsistently or inappropriately.

Supporting material is used to enhance meaning. Writing is appropriately paraphrased and uses direct quotes as applicable.

LO6: Identify sources (AWE 2; Credit to source)

Sources are missing. Writing inconsistently identifies or misrepresents sources.

Writing clearly identifies the source of nonoriginal material and/or ideas.

Technology: Use technology effectively. 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

LO1: Apply the features of technology programs (i.e., Excel, Word, PowerPoint) to communicate information effectively.

Technology program is not applied appropriately.

Technology program includes multiple formatting issues and/or is difficult to interpret.

Technology program includes proper formatting.

Data can be easily read and interpreted.