Unit 14 Signature Assignment

lgreene078
FO613SignatureAssignmentRubricApr20211.pdf

FO613 Signature Assignment Rubric

Area Minimal Adequate Good Exceptional Points

Symptom

Identification,

Observation, and

Impact

Student did not detect and described

two positive and two negative

symptoms of psychosis in the client,

or did not mention the client’s

presentation in the video, or

minimally discussed the impact of his

symptoms on his interactions with

others.

0-8 pts

Student detected and described two

positive and two negative symptoms

of psychosis in the client, mentioned

the client’s presentation in the video,

and discussed the impact of his

symptoms on his interactions with

others.

9-11 pts

Student detected and described at

least two positive and at least two

negative symptoms of psychosis in

the client, appraised the client’s

presentation in the video, and

analyzed the impact of his symptoms

on his interactions with others.

12-14 pts

Student detected and described

multiple positive and multiple

negative symptoms of psychosis in

the client, astutely appraised the

client’s presentation in the video, and

accurately analyzed the impact of his

symptoms on his interactions with

others.

16-18 pts

18

Differential

Diagnoses

Student either did not generate any

alternate diagnoses or did not

distinguish their alternate diagnosis

from the actual diagnosis.

0-5 pts

Student generated at least one

alternate diagnosis but minimally

stated their diagnostic rationale for it.

6-8 pts

Student generated alternate

diagnoses and delineated their

diagnostic rationale for them.

9-10 pts

Student generated multiple alternate

diagnoses, provided their diagnostic

rationale, and contrasted their

alternate diagnoses from the actual

diagnosis.

11-12 pts

12

Therapeutic

Modality

Student did not select a therapeutic

modality or their selected modality is

not suitable to treat psychotic

disorders.

0-5 pts

Student selected and applied a

therapeutic modality to treat the

psychosis in this case but the

modality may not have been optimal

for treating psychotic disorders.

6-8 pts

Student selected and applied an

appropriate therapeutic modality to

effectively treat the psychosis in this

case.

9-10 pts

Student selected and applied an

appropriate therapeutic modality to

effectively treat the psychosis in this

case and discussed the client’s

anticipated response to it.

11-12 pts

12

Professional

Collaboration

Student’s plan for collaboration with

other professionals on this case was

either absent or did not involve

relevant professionals.

0-5 pts

Student created a plan for

collaboration with at least one other

professional on this case.

6-8 pts

Student created an effective plan for

interdisciplinary collaboration with

other relevant professionals on this

case.

9-10 pts

Student created an effective plan for

interdisciplinary collaboration with

multiple other relevant professionals

on this case and discussed how those

professional would work together.

11-12 pts

12

Diversity Student minimally differentiated

between treatment of African and

European clients in the diagnosis of

psychotic disorders, did not identify

racism as the cause, and did not

propose recommendations for

reducing bias in mental health.

0-4 pts

Student differentiated between

treatment of African and European

clients in the diagnosis of psychotic

disorders, but did not identify racism

as the cause, nor did the student

propose recommendations for

reducing bias in mental health.

5-6 pts

Student differentiated between

treatment of African and European

clients in the diagnosis of psychotic

disorders, identified racism as the

cause, and proposed meaningful

recommendations for reducing bias

in mental health.

7-8 pts

Student differentiated between

treatment of African and European

clients in the diagnosis of psychotic

disorders, identified racism as the

cause, extrapolated that racial bias to

other mental health disorders, and

proposed meaningful

recommendations for reducing bias

in mental health.

9-10 pts

10

Area Minimal Adequate Good Exceptional Points

Correctional

System

Observations,

Analysis, and

Recommendations

Student described deficiencies in the

treatment of the mentally ill

population within the criminal justice

system, but minimally associated the

prison environment with the

manifestation of psychotic

symptoms, and did not prescribe at

least one cogent recommendations

for treatment of the mentally ill

within the penal system.

0-7 pts

Student described deficiencies in the

treatment of the mentally ill

population within the criminal justice

system, associated the prison

environment with the manifestation

of psychotic symptoms, but did not

prescribe at least one cogent

recommendations for treatment of

the mentally ill within the penal

system.

8-11 pts

Student critiqued deficiencies in the

treatment of the mentally ill

population within the criminal justice

system, associated the stress of

imprisonment with the manifestation

of psychotic symptoms, and

prescribed at least one cogent

recommendations for treatment of

the mentally ill within the penal

system.

12-14 pts

Student critiqued multiple

deficiencies in the treatment of the

mentally ill population within the

criminal justice system, associated

the stress of imprisonment with the

manifestation of psychotic

symptoms, and prescribed several

cogent recommendations for

treatment of the mentally ill within

the penal system.

15-16 pts

16

Assessment of

Psychosis

Student’s attempted questions to

assess for psychosis were minimal,

irrelevant, or simplistic.

0-4 pts

Student constructed questions to

ascertain the presence of psychosis,

but the questions overtly inquired

about a disorder rather than

detecting the symptoms of it.

5-6 pts

Student constructed insightful

questions to ascertain the presence

of psychotic symptoms.

7-8 pts

Student constructed multiple,

insightful questions to accurately

ascertain the presence of psychotic

symptoms.

9-10 pts

10

APA Minimally attends to structure and form of APA style for title page, content, citations, and references. Paper contains repetitive errors in grammar, and/or the writing style is disorganized or casual. 0-4 pts

Follows basic structure of APA with 3 or more errors in APA style for title page, content, citations, and references. Paper contains 3 or more errors in grammar, and/or the writing style is casual or lacks a professional approach. 5-6 pts

Follows basic structure of APA with no more than 2 errors in APA style for title page, content, citations, and references. Paper contains 2 or more errors in grammar, and/or the writing style is adequate. 7-8 pts

Follows basic structure of APA with no more than 1 error in APA style for title page, content, citations, and references. Paper contains no errors in grammar, and the writing style is highly professional. 9-10 pts

10

Total 100