Only for honest business writer
SALES
Find the Right Metrics for Your Sales Team by Frank V. Cespedes and Bob Marsh
AUGUST 22, 2017
“What gets measured gets managed” is a longstanding business aphorism. But today’s
sales technologies enable companies to measure almost anything, which leads many
managers to try to measure everything. As a consequence, managers don’t have a NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now
clear sense of what is really driving sales in their business, while salespeople, who are
inundated with dozens of metrics, get lost in the day-to-day noise. The result is poor
management of what matters.
The challenge, of course, is to decide on the right metrics. Consider the results of a
survey of key performance indicators (KPIs) being used by more than 800 sales teams
across industries. Wins are the most common metric used across sales roles and
industries. On average, firms measure closed deals and rep production against quota
monthly, which isn’t surprising. Selling is a performance art, and “making the
number” should be the goal of any sales organization, but a closed deal is an outcome
and a lagging indicator; it can’t be used by the salesperson or sales manager to
improve future outcomes.
This is why leading indicators such as demos, web registrations, calls, or C-suite-level
meetings are often more instructive. Instead of reviewing historical results, which are
beyond a rep’s control, they offer real-time feedback on whether salespeople are
spending their time and efforts in the best way. Leading indicators are within a rep’s
control. If salespeople are behind on a key indicator, for example, they and their
managers can change behavior to increase the probability of success.
Deconstruct Your Sales Funnel
In order to improve sales outcomes and clarify the relevant sales KPIs in your
business, you need to deconstruct your sales funnel.
Here’s a typical flow of activities:
Prospecting: cold calls, email, phone, LinkedIn, etc.
Qualifying: initial conversations aimed at separating the merely interested from the NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now
actual prospects and determining who is a qualified opportunity
Advancing opportunities: discussions with qualified opportunities to communicate
the value of your product to the right contacts
Closing: final steps in negotiating and winning the business
Post-sale: service, order fulfillment, possible customization, and onboarding activities
to ensure the client is successful
Every company is different, but every business has a sales conversion funnel. Some
funnels are relatively short and simple, while others are long and complex. Knowing
what type of funnel applies in your business is essential to clarifying key metrics and
performance management practices, including sales incentives.
Consider one SaaS company that sells a menu display and advertising platform to
restaurants, which is a big but fragmented market. The challenge for reps is that,
because restaurants all have different budgeting processes, they must be there at the
right time to close that sale. Once a sale is closed, the firm incurs low marginal costs in
setting up and maintaining a customer on its platform. In this situation, it makes
sense to “feed the funnel” and provide reps with incentives, through proper metrics,
to make frequent and repeated calls.
By contrast, consider another SaaS firm that sells a subscription software product that
provides big productivity and environmental benefits if the customer is willing to
alter some traditional workflow processes and use the software at sufficient scale.
This is a more protracted buying and selling process, where ongoing customer
education and onboarding is crucial. Awareness and initial enthusiasm from a
prospect on the capacity to adopt new software can be deceptive and expensive for NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now
this firm. Here, simply “feeding the funnel” is a mistake: Lead generation is less
important than pursuing the right leads. Moreover, this SaaS firm’s profit margins are
mainly in contract renewals and ancillary services it can provide if it gets the right
scale and usage in the initial sale. Here, management must ensure that sales reps vet
the top part of the funnel carefully so that they don’t spend months chasing the
wrong prospects, while providing reps with the means and an incentive to manage
that long selling cycle and renewal process.
The experience of Paycor, a payroll processing company, is a useful example. Like
many firms, its frontline sales managers were typically former top-producing
salespeople, many of whom were managing other salespeople for the first time. In
making that transition, they tended to focus on what they knew best: helping to close
a deal. But after closely examining the selling cycle, it became apparent that the best
time to work with their reps to influence the sale was earlier in the funnel. Sales
managers used the leading indicators to drive a 55% increase in relevant new-
business meetings and a corresponding 50% reduction in onboarding time.
Make Performance Reviews Count
Finding the right metrics isn’t the end of the story. Selling is about behaviors, not just
analyses, and making sure that salespeople align their behaviors with those metrics is
an ongoing process. Performance reviews can help, if they’re done right.
Unfortunately, reviews are typically underutilized levers for influencing behavior in
most organizations. Busy sales managers tend to treat them as cursory, after-the-fact
discussions about quota attainment and compensation, not coaching about going-
forward behaviors. The result is that, too often, “feedback” from managers is really a
sermon whose message is “get better and sell more.” Like most sermons, this may
NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now
work when you’re preaching to the already converted, but it’s too abstract if you’re
not. Clarifying leading indicators can make a difference, because the salesperson then
knows the behaviors they need to change in order to improve performance.
Many sales managers begin conversations with reps by asking well-intentioned but
generalized questions like, “What’s closing this month and how can we make those
deals happen faster?” In response, reps focus on the next 30 days and the required
onboarding of new customers, and then neglect important activities that happen in
between. This is one reason why sales output is so variable — strong sales months
followed by catch-up prospecting during the lean times — in so many organizations.
After deconstructing the funnel, however, managers can use different talking points
that allocate attention and resources toward those activities. For example: “Sofia, you
are making lots of calls and scheduling many meetings, but you’re calling on too
many small firms and your qualification criteria have you chasing many prospects
that are highly unlikely to close. Let’s fix your account prioritization.”
Or: “Arjun, you are behind peers in setting meetings with VP-level prospects, and we
know those contacts increase our win rate substantially. Let’s talk about the
organization of your prospects and what we can do to get the right access.”
Among other things, conversations like these — especially when reflected in
accessible reports and personalized scorecards — empower reps to know where they
stand and where to focus. They allow sales managers to provide feedback about
behaviors, not just intentions. Beyond individual coaching, moreover, relevant
leading indicators can also spur more systemic means for generating proactive selling
behaviors: incentives to schedule new-business meetings with the right contacts or to
pitch bolt-on products that amortize onboarding time and increase renewal rates.
NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now
These steps are within a company’s internal circle of influence, not in the less
controllable external market environment. But exercising that influence requires
managers who know what metrics count and who can then translate data into
relevant selling behaviors. Those managers are not just discussing quotas and after-
the-fact outcomes; they are truly managing sales performance.
Frank Cespedes is a Senior Lecturer at Harvard Business School and author of Aligning Strategy and Sales (Harvard Business Review Press).
Bob Marsh is the Founder and CEO of LevelEleven. He has over 20 years of sales experience and works with companies to help build data-driven sales
organizations.
This article is about SALES
F O L L O W T H I S T O P I C
Comments
Leave a Comment
P O S T NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now
0 COMMENTS
POSTING GUIDELINES
We hope the conversations that take place on HBR.org will be energetic, constructive, and thought-provoking. To comment,
readers must sign in or register. And to ensure the quality of the discussion, our moderating team will review all comments and may
edit them for clarity, length, and relevance. Comments that are overly promotional, mean-spirited, or off-topic may be deleted per
the moderators' judgment. All postings become the property of Harvard Business Publishing.
J O I N T H E C O N V E R S A T I O N
NO THANKS, I WANT TO CONTINUE READING.
Get the latest from HBR emailed to your inbox. Sign up now