Project Control, Sustainability Policy and PowerPoint Presentation
3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 1/6
Criteria Excellent Good Developing Needs Improvem
Identification
and discussion
of any ethical
considerations
in purchasing
activities
5 points
Identification of possible
ethical considerations
were made.
The importance of
societal concerns in
business purchasing was
discussed in an
insightful and thorough
manner. Any possible
ethical conflict were
identified and if none
were found a strong
argument was made to
explain why that was
the case. All conclusions
drawn were reasoned
logically and
application of the class
material and case study
facts resulting in a
demonstration of an
excellent understanding
of the ethical
considerations for
purchasing materials.
( 4.5-5.0)
4.25 points
Identification of possible ethical
considerations was made.
The importance of societal concerns
in business purchasing was
discussed in an competent
manner. Most possible ethical
conflicts were identified and if none
were found an argument was made
to explain why that was the
case. Most conclusions drawn were
reasoned well with exception of one
of the products under discussion.
(4.0-4.49)
3.75 points
Identification of
possible ethical
considerations was
made. However the
discussion was too
general.
The importance of
societal concerns in
business purchasing
was satisfactory. Most
but one or
two possible ethical
conflicts were missed
or vaguely discussed.
A general discussion
as to why none were
found rather than a
strong argument was
made to explain why
that was the
case. Most
conclusions drawn
were reasoned well
with exception of one
of the products under
discussion. Use of
class material and
case study facts was
sufficient but added
to the feeling that
3.25 points
Identification and
discussion was
attempted but
reasoning with us
of class material a
case study facts w
sparse.
Conclusions were
underdeveloped
lack sound
reasoning suppor
by the class mate
and case study
facts.
(3.0-3.49)
3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 2/6
Identification
of Sustainable
Issues both
eco and
financial for
the items to
be purchased
Content of
only a general
understanding of the
ethical issues resulted.
(3.5-3.99)
5 points
Identification of
Sustainable Issues both
eco and financial for the
items to be purchased
were
complete. Conclusions
drawn in
discussion show
insightful understanding
of the possible issues
surrounding supply
purchasing both in terms
of money and planet. All
products were
addressed. Explanation
of the possible issues
surrounding the
products reflect a strong
level of analysis,
synthesis,
evaluation with
reasoning for
conclusions
supported by the case
material and case study
facts.
(4.5-5.0)
4.25 points
Identification of Sustainable Issues
both eco and financial for the items
to be purchased were
complete. Conclusions drawn in
discussion show a
good understanding of the possible
issues surrounding supply
purchasing both in terms of money
and planet. All products were
addressed but the explanation of
the possible issues surrounding the
products while strong, showed
areas of weak application of the
case material and case study facts.
(4.0-4.49)
3.75 points
Identification of
Sustainable Issues
both eco and financial
for the items to be
purchased were
complete. Conclusions
drawn in
discussion show
a general
understanding of
the possible issues
surrounding supply
purchasing both in
terms of money and
planet. All products
were addressed but
the explanation of the
possible issues
surrounding the
products was
overbroad thus
showing weakness in
the application of the
case material and case
study facts. More
detail needed.
(3.5-3.99)
3.25 points
An attempt was
made to discuss
sustainability issu
but the conclusio
drawn reflected
a weak level
of reasoning and
support from the
case material and
case study facts.
(3.0-3.49)
6 points 5.1 points 4.5 points 3.9 points
3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 3/6
slide
presentation
and summary
of
assignments
Slide
Presentation
and Flow
Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of how
the assignments
form the purchasing
link of a supply chain.
Presentation addressed
completely every aspect
of the assignments both
minor and major.
Conclusions and link
description
discussion demonstrated
excellent application of
critical thinking skills as
well as strong support
from the class material
and cases study facts.
Research was evident
when appropriate.
(5.4-6.0)
Demonstrates a good understanding
of how the assignments form the
purchasing link of a supply chain.
Presentation addressed
completely the major points of the
assignments but one or two minor
points were missed. Conclusions
and link description
discussion demonstrated
competent application of critical
thinking skills as well as strong
support from the class material and
cases study facts. Research was
evident when appropriate.
(4.8-5.399)
Demonstrates
satisfactory
understanding of
discussion but it
was general in its
discussion of most of
the major assignment
aspects and
missed more than two
minor aspects of
assignment. Use of
the class material and
case study facts was
sufficient but not as
evident in the
explanation of the
connection purchasing
to supply chain.
(4.2-4.799)
Fails to show a fir
understanding of
requirements;
missed two key
elements or seve
minor aspects of
assignments in th
discussion. Use o
class material,
research if
appropriate and
case study facts w
minimal and not
evident in the lin
connection
discussion.
(3.60-4.199)
3 points
Presentation flows well
and logically; transitions
are smooth, interesting,
persuasive and enhance
presentation. The slides
are bulleted, contain
intext citation were
appropriate and notes
explain the slides while
supporting the
conclusions drawn.
Reference list was
2.55 points
Presentation flows well; smooth
transitions; use of persuasiveness
was underdeveloped in some areas;
slides were bulleted and contained
APA intext citations where
appropriate, notes mostly explained
the slides. Reference list was
included in a separate slide at the
end of the presentation.
(2.4-2.69)
2.25 points
Presentation mostly
flowed smooth
transitions used were
missing in one or two
slides; no use of
persuasive language;
slides were bulleted
but the intext
citations were missing
one or two times;
notes were generally
instructive of the
1.95 points
Presentation is
unorganized; ve
few transitions
and/or they distr
from presentatio
persuasiveness w
generally
undeveloped. Sli
contained all
discussion rathe
than the notes
Support for th
3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 4/6
Attention to
Instructions
Writing
Mechanics
included in a separate
slide at the end.
(2.7-3.0)
material presented.
Reference list
included in a separate
slide at the end.
(2.1 - 2.39)
information
presented was
minimal.
(1.8 - 2.09)
3 points
Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of
requirements
responding completely
to each aspect of
assignment including
minor aspects of the
assignment such as
using third person
writing, required use of
course readings, and
assignment format.
(2.7-3.0)
2.5 points
Demonstrates excellent
understanding of requirements;
missed one minor aspect of
assignment.
(2.4-2.69)
2.3 points
Demonstrates
satisfactory
understanding of
requirements; missed
a key element or two
minor aspects of
assignment.
(2.1-2.39)
1.95 points
Fails to show a fir
understanding of
requirements;
missed two key
elements or seve
minor aspects of
assignment.
(1.8-2.09)
2 points
Strictly adheres to
standard usage rules of
written English,
including but not limited
to capitalization,
punctuation, run-on
sentences, missing or
extra words, stylistic
errors, spelling and
grammatical errors. No
errors found. No
1.7 points
Excellently adheres to standard
usage of mechanics: conventions of
written English, including
capitalization, punctuation, and
spelling. One to three errors found.
(1.6- 1.79)
1.5 points
Satisfactorily adheres
to standard usage
rules of mechanics:
conventions of
English, including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. Four to 10
errors found.
(1.4- 1.59)
1.3 points
Minimally adhere
to standard usage
rules of mechanic
conventions of
written English,
including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling.
(1.2-1.39)
3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 5/6
Total / 26
Overall Score
APA Format
contractions or jargon
used.
(1.8- 2.0)
2 points
No APA style or usage
errors; Proper citation of
source material is used
throughout paper;
Reference titles follow
APA with only the first
word, the first word
after a colon and proper
nouns capitalized.
(1.8-2.0)
1.7 points
Attempts in-text citations and
reference list but one or two APA
style errors noted or fails to use
APA citations when appropriate 1-2
times.
(1.6-1.79)
1.5 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists; APA
style errors are noted
throughout document;
Fails to use APA
citations when
appropriate 3 times in
document.
(1.4 -1.59)
1.3 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists; Fa
to use APA citatio
when appropriate
5 times; or prese
only 1-2 in-text
citations and
reference list in a
paper that requir
APA citations
throughout the
document.
(1.2-1.39)
Excellent 23.4 points
minimum
Good 20.8 points
minimum
Developing 18.2 points
minimum
Needs
Improvement 15.6 points minimum
Failure 0 points minimum
3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 6/6
Close