BMIS 664 - Final Project
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction and Conclusion
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
The introduction is succinct and embodies the project’s primary objectives and outcomes. The introduction constructs the purpose of the system. A compelling and justifiable conclusion is developed that supports the key outcomes. More than 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined / 250 each.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The introduction and conclusion are succinct and embody most of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes, and/or the introduction constructs an unclear purpose of the system. Justified conclusion developed. Minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined / 250 each.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The introduction and/or conclusion are generalized and embody some of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes and/or have less than the minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined and/or are not defensible.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially unmet or not present
20 pts
Assessment of the security scenario including a review of related literature, forensic investigation, and strategy.
50 to >45.0 pts
Advanced
Review of literature shows mastery of cyber security research specific to electronic fund transfers. Each component of the forensics investigation is thoroughly addressed and supported by scholarly literature including the key stakeholders, hardware, and software involved in the fraudulent fund transfers. Over 2,500 relevant words exist and over 10 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles exist that justify the forensic investigative approaches and strategies.
45 to >41.0 pts
Proficient
Review of literature shows comprehension of cyber security research specific to electronic fund transfers and/or less than 90% of each requirement of the forensics investigation is thoroughly addressed and supported by scholarly literature including the key stakeholders, hardware, and software involved in the fraudulent fund transfers and/or 2,500 relevant words exist and/or 10 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles exist that justify the forensic investigative approaches and strategies.
41 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Review of literature shows some comprehension of cyber security research specific to electronic fund transfers and/or less than 70% of each requirement of the forensics investigation is thoroughly addressed and supported by scholarly literature including the key stakeholders, hardware, and software involved in the fraudulent fund transfers and/or less than 2,500 relevant words exist and/or less than 10 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles exist that justify the forensic investigative approaches and strategies.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially unmet or not present
50 pts
Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
Mitigation Plan
56 to >51.0 pts
Advanced
Mitigation plan is more detailed and higher quality than the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the proposed personnel structure/team, mechanisms of defense, budget, schedule, risk management, procurement management, secure systems analysis, and design to prevent this incident from occurring in the future. Over two (2) new comprehensive network architecture diagrams exist with proper screenshots and over 20 pieces of hardware that mitigate future occurrences of both internal and external fraudulent electronic fund transfers. Plan is over 2,000 words with over 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.
51 to >46.0 pts
Proficient
Mitigation plan is a minimum of 70% complete, as detailed and of parallel quality as the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the proposed personnel structure/team, mechanisms of defense, budget, schedule, risk management, procurement management, secure systems analysis, and design to prevent this incident from occurring in the future. Minimum of two (2) new comprehensive network architecture diagrams exist with proper screenshots and 20 pieces of hardware that mostly mitigate future occurrences of both internal and external fraudulent electronic fund transfers. Plan is 2,000 words with a minimum of 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.
46 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Mitigation plan is less than 70% complete and/or not as detailed and of parallel quality as the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the proposed personnel structure/team, mechanisms of defense, budget, schedule, risk management, procurement management, secure systems analysis, and design to prevent this incident from occurring in the future and/or less than two (2) new comprehensive network architecture diagrams exist with proper screenshots and/or the diagrams have less than 20 pieces of hardware that mostly mitigate future occurrences of both internal and external fraudulent electronic fund transfers and/or plan is less than 2,000 words and/or has less than 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.
0 pts
Not Present
Screenshots of the network architecture diagrams are not present with proper operating system dates and times and/or substantially unmet or not present.
56 pts
Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
APA, Grammar, and Spelling
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Properly formatted APA paper with table of contents and references pages. Correct spelling and grammar used. Contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. Excellent organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
Paper contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or some errors (3-7) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Paper contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (7+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.
0 pts
Not Present
Paper contains more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (10+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.
20 pts
Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
Overall Requirements
34 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
Over 5,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows excellent mastery and knowledge of cyber and information security attacks and wire fraud. Over 20 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that directly relate to and sufficiently support cyber security and forensics. Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are present.
30 to >28.0 pts
Proficient
Minimum of 5,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows understanding and knowledge of cyber and information security attacks and wire fraud and/or at least 20 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that relate to and mostly support cyber security and forensics. Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are present.
28 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Less than 5,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows comprehension and knowledge of cyber and information security attacks and wire fraud and/or less than 20 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that relate to and mostly support cyber security and forensics. Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are present.
0 pts
Not Present
Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are not present and/or project requirements are substantially unmet or not present.
34 pts
Total Points: 180
Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140