Paper and Presentation

CITIZEN RIGHTS VS SECURITY

CITIZEN RIGHTS Vs SECURITY

Tejasvi Kore

New England College

Abstract

Security is one of the fundamentally vital aspects that must be constantly maintained considering the wide variety of threats incurred from different places globally. The State’s Responsibility in Citizen Security is stipulated in article 4, Right to life, article 5, Physical Integrity, liberty in article 7. The State’s Responsibility for the acts of its agents and third parties. Article 1 is used to establish whether a violation of human rights can be attributed to a state party—article 3 of the Universal Declaration of human rights. Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person. The characteristics of public policy on citizen security include Human rights standards that should be incorporated when creating policies on Citizen Security. The principles of participation, accountability and non-discrimination should be applied. It requires adapting the legal framework to meet the need or prevent/suppress crime and violence. To develop a criminal procedure and prison management. Strike a balance between authorities vested in state institutions and guarantees on human rights. The fourth Amendment bans unreasonable searches and seizures. The government must have probable cause to search a car, obtain a wiretap, or search a place of habitation. Foreign Intelligence Security Act prevents the searches of suspected foreign spies and terrorists unless the attorney general obtains a warrant from a particular national security court called the FISA court. The warrant has to show that the individual is a foreign terrorist and a member of an international terrorist group. Fifth Amendment/Miranda Rules laid down in 1966 by the supreme court, If suspected individuals request a lawyer, the interrogation must cease until the lawyer arrives. Security suspects have a right to remain silent. The law protects these individuals since they cannot undergo coercive interrogation.