HUMAN RESSOURCE

abbe
FINALHUMANRESSOURCE.docx

Human Ressource

In this presentation, you will serve as a consultant by applying concepts that you learned in class and applying them to organizational problems at a company that you have either personally worked with in the past or are currently working at now. Observe the organization and identify two problems with the way that they are conducting business. Review the concepts that we have learned over the course of this class and think about how two of the concepts can be applied to address the two problems that you identified. 

The presentation must describe the company you are currently working at or have worked at in the past, the two problems that you identified, and the two concepts that you learned from the class to address the two problems. It should also include a conclusion which summarizes how the concepts you learned from class can specifically help to improve the organization’s effectiveness. Your presentation should also be used to convey your information most effectively. For example, there should not be too much text on any one slide and it should be free of any grammar/typo issues.

Your presentation should be a maximum of 5 minutes long. The slides of your presentation will only be accepted using PowerPoint. Google Slides will not be accepted and you will receive a zero if they are submitted instead of a PowerPoint file. Slides are due by 11:59PM on 5/9. The below rubric will be used to grade the presentation. Please read the rubric carefully for further instructions.

Rubric

MGMT 316 Final Presentation Rubric

MGMT 316 Final Presentation Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/Spelling/Readability

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation has no spelling or grammar issues, and reads smoothly.

9 to >7.0 pts

Acceptable

Presentation has a minor grammar or spelling error.

7 to >3.0 pts

Minimally Acceptable

Presentation has a few grammar or spelling errors.

3 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Presentation has so many grammar or spelling errors that it is difficult or impossible to understand.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction/Background about the company. Needs to include the name of the company, mission of the company, size (how many employees at the location where you worked), location, and product/service provided

20 to >19.0 pts

Excellent

Includes the name, mission, size, location, and product/service provided

19 to >15.0 pts

Acceptable

15 points if missing one of the following: name, mission, size, location, or product/service provided.

15 to >12.0 pts

Minimally Acceptable

12 points if missing two of the following: name, mission, size, location, or product/service provided.

12 to >9.0 pts

Unacceptable

9 points if missing three of the following: name, mission, size, location, or product/service provided

9 to >0 pts

No Marks

3 points if missing four of the following: name, mission, size, location, or product/service provided and 0 points if none of this information is provided.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem #1 - Clearly identify AND describe the first organizational problem.

20 to >19.0 pts

Excellent

The problem in the organization is clearly identified and described. It is clear what the problem is and why it specifically is a problem for the company.

19 to >10.0 pts

Acceptable

The problem is clearly identified but the description is vague as to WHY this is specifically a problem for the company.

10 to >1.0 pts

Unacceptable

The problem is not clearly identified and the reasoning for WHY this is specifically a problem for the company is vague or not present.

1 to >0 pts

Not present

There is no problem identified or the problem and the reasoning that is identified is not relevant to the course material.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the specific concept that you learned from class that can be used to help fix and address Problem #1 that you identified.

30 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

There is a specific and clear description of the relevant course material and how that material can be applied to help address and fix the first problem identified.

29 to >20.0 pts

Acceptable

There is a clear description of a solution that could fix the problem but the class material referenced is vague.

20 to >10.0 pts

Minimally Acceptable

There is a vague description of the problem and/or there is no specific material from class that is referenced.

10 to >0 pts

Not Present

There is no identification of a solution and no specific material from class that can be applied to fix the problem.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem #2 - Clearly identify AND describe the second organizational problem.

20 to >19.0 pts

Excellent

The problem in the organization is clearly identified and described. It is clear what the problem is and why it specifically is a problem for the company.

19 to >10.0 pts

Acceptable

The problem is clearly identified but the description is vague as to WHY this is specifically a problem for the company.

10 to >1.0 pts

Unacceptable

The problem is not clearly identified and the reasoning for WHY this is specifically a problem for the company is vague or not present.

1 to >0 pts

Not present

There is no problem identified or the problem and the reasoning that is identified is not relevant to the course material.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the specific concept that you learned from class that can be used to help fix and address Problem #2 that you identified.

30 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

There is a specific and clear description of the relevant course material and how that material can be applied to help address and fix the second problem identified.

29 to >20.0 pts

Acceptable

The problem is clearly identified but the description is vague as to WHY this is specifically a problem for the company.

20 to >10.0 pts

Minimally Acceptable

There is a vague description of the problem and/or there is no specific material from class that is referenced.

10 to >0 pts

Not Present

There is no identification of a solution and no specific material from class that can be applied to fix the problem.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion - Summary of how the company would be more successful by improving their human resource practices as discussed in this course.

15 pts

Excellent

There is a clear summary of how the company would specifically be more successful if they implemented the HR practices recommended in the paper.

15 to >8.0 pts

Minimally Acceptable

There is a summary identifying the two solutions proposed in the paper but there is no clear connection made as to how these solutions would specifically help the company be more successful.

8 to >1.0 pts

Unacceptable

The two solutions proposed are not mentioned at all in the conclusion paragraph and there is no mention of how these solutions would specifically help the company be more successful.

1 to >0 pts

No Marks

There is no conclusion.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText on Slides

5 pts

Excellent

There is an appropriate amount of text on each slide.

5 to >3.0 pts

Minimally Acceptable

There is too much text per slide or the text is not provided in a way that is easy for the reader to understand

3 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

There are excessive amounts of text on the majority of the slides in the presentation.

5 pts

Total Points: 150