Final Clinical Evaluation and Student Feedback
Final Clinical Evaluation and Student Feedback
By Day 7 Final Clinical Evaluation and Student Feedback
By Day 7, your Preceptor will be required to complete their Final Clinical Evaluation, and you will be required to complete your Student Feedback.
Ensure that both you and your Preceptor have submitted the required online evaluations in the Meditrek system. Be sure you have completed all fields in the log and ask your Preceptor to verify your completed hours in Meditrek. If feedback is not received, you will receive an Incomplete (I) as a grade. There is nothing to submit in the classroom for this assignment; all components are completed in Meditrek.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
Clinical Evaluation Grades
Your clinical instructor will complete an evaluation with feedback from your preceptor and evaluation of your work. Meditrek calculates an average score which will be used to determine the score that will be entered into Blackboard for your evaluation grade.
Students must demonstrate achievement of the clinical learning outcomes for the course by achieving a minimum score of 3 (meets requirements) on all criteria on the final evaluation. Scores of less than 3 on any criteria can lead to course failure or the implementation of a clinical performance improvement plan.
Rubric
PRAC_6645_Week10_Final_Evaluation
|
PRAC_6645_Week10_Final_Evaluation |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Preceptor submitted evaluation: Please use the preceptor evaluation average score to determine level of achievement*A score less than 3.0 will require a remediation plan at midterm evaluation *A score less than 3.0 will result in clinical failure and/or potential performance improvement opportunities at final evaluation |
40 to >39.0 ptsExcellentPreceptor submitted evaluation average score equals 4.0 39 to >29.0 ptsGoodPreceptor submitted evaluation average score ranges from 3.99-3.0 29 to >19.0 ptsFairPreceptor submitted evaluation average score ranges from 2.99-2.0 19 to >0 ptsPoorPreceptor submitted evaluation average score ranges from 1.99-0.0 |
40 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2:Faculty Review of Overall Student Clinical Work Up to Evaluation Point: ᵒ Students overall communication is effective and professional. Student demonstrates professional behavior. *Student provides safe and competent patient care. * Student demonstrates an appropriate knowledge base for advanced practice. *Student applies appropriate evidence in managing patient care. *Student demonstrates initiative in seeking out new learning experiences, procedures, or treatment options. ᵒDemonstrates Cultural Sensitivity with delivery of care. |
40 to >29.0 ptsExcellent*Preceptor expressed no concerns regarding student communication, professionalism, or dependability. ... *Preceptor indicates student consistently provides safe and competent patient care. ... *Students demonstrates outstanding knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments. ... *Student consistently applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. ... *Student consistently demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. ... *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates exceptional knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. 29 to >19.0 ptsGood*Preceptor expressed minor concerns regarding student communication, professionalism, and dependability.... *Preceptor indicates student provides safe and competent patient care. ... *Students demonstrates appropriate knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments. ... *Student applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. ... *Student demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. ... *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates adequate knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. 19 to >10.0 ptsFair*Preceptor expressed specific, detailed concerns regarding student communication, professionalism, and dependability. ... Preceptor with specific, detailed concerns regarding safety or competent patient care. ... *Students demonstrates inconsistent knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments.... *Student inconsistently applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. ... *Student inconsistently demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. ... *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates minimal knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. 10 to >0 ptsPoor*Preceptor indicated they would not precept student again or decides to terminate preceptor relationship during course. ... *Preceptor expressed significant concerns regarding safety and competency in patient care. ... *Students demonstrates inadequate knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments. ... *Student rarely applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. ... *Student rarely demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. ... *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates lack of knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. |
40 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomeᵒ Follows Clinical Policies and Procedures:ᵒ Completes clinical in timely manner ᵒ Documents Meditrek data following course requirements ᵒ Respectful behaviorsᵒ Active participant in patient care with computer camera on for telehealth clinical (if applicable) ᵒ Facilitates preceptor contact for evaluationsᵒ Student maintains academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and submitted assignments. |
20 to >15.0 ptsExcellent*Student follows clinical policies and procedures as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. ... *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 100% of time during telehealth sessions. ... *Student consistently maintains HIPPA compliance and academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. 15 to >10.0 ptsGood*Student follows clinical policies and procedures 80 % of the time as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. ... *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 80% of time during telehealth sessions. ... *Student maintains HIPPA compliance and academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. 10 to >5.0 ptsFair*Student follows clinical policies and procedures 70 % of the time as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. ... *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 70% of time during telehealth sessions. ... *Student with several concerns noted regarding academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. 5 to >0 ptsPoor*Student follows clinical policies and procedures 60%or less of the time as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. ... *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 60% or less of time during telehealth sessions.... *Student with significant concerns noted regarding academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. |
20 pts |
|
Criteria |
Midterm Score |
Final Score |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Communication |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Uses effective communication and interpersonal skills when meeting with patients, office staff, preceptor and other health care professionals. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Professionalism |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Interacts in a collegial and professional manner. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accepts constructive feedback and seeks to integrate it into clinical performance. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Is punctual and appropriately dressed. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assumes responsibility for evaluating own progress and is able to define the areas that need improvement. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Subjective Data |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Obtains an accurate, comprehensive diagnostic assessment from the client appropriate to the presenting issue and the level of the student. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Establishes a therapeutic alliance with an individual, family or group that is developmentally appropriate. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Objective Data |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Performs a thorough review of systems, physical assessment (when indicated), developmental assessment, family assessment, past psychiatric history, and mental status exam appropriate to the client's presenting issue. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Assessment |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Uses information from the interview, history, clinical record review and observation of client to create a concise problem list. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognizes and prioritizes the issues in the problem list that need attention and generate differentials. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Determines and uses appropriate assessment tools for the clients' presenting problem and understands the results. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Plan |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Collaborates with client to develop a treatment plan, taking into consideration patient's factors and cultural background. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Uses the literature to formulate evidence-based practice, interventions and treatment plans. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Considers issues of client safety to include risk to self and others. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Considers legal and ethical issues. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Presentation and Documentation |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Oral presentation includes succinct summary of pertinent findings, diagnosis, differentials, and treatment plan, taking into consideration patient factors and cultural background. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clear, logical and organized written documentation of patient encounters. |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Score |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|