Final assign 6053

Finalassgnrubric.docx

Home >Applied Sciences homework help >Final assign 6053

NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:· An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).· A description of the changes being proposed.· Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The narrated presentation accurately and completely presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. ... The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The narrated presentation adequately presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. ... The narrated presentation adequately describes the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, and incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary or executive summary is missing. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization or justifications are missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.· Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.· Identification of a change management team (by title/role).· A plan for communicating the changes you propose.· A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management team by title/ role. ... The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. ... The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The narrated presentation adequately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately identifies a change management team by title/ role. ... The narrated presentation adequately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. ... The narrated presentation adequately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes or stakeholders are missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role or change management team is missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed or communication plan is missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed or recommendations are missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. ... PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. ... PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. ... PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. ... References slide is incomplete or missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Narration

10 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

Narration is present.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor

Narration is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint Presentation: The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100