Final Assessment - Outline + BIBLIOGRAPHY + PROPOSAL (Very High Quality Paper Required - Should Be No Less Than A+)
Health 556 Final Proposal Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced 92-100% (A) |
Proficient 84-91% (B) |
Developing 1-83% (< C) |
Not present |
|
Content/Development 75 points |
75 – 69 points All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive.
Major points are stated clearly and are supported by professional literature or logic.
Meaningful use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topic or theme.
Research is adequate and timely for the topic.
The paper is written in such a way that the context and purpose it clear to the reader |
69 – 63 points All key elements of the assignment are covered
Content is comprehensive and accurate.
Major points are stated clearly and supported by research
Source material is used to elaborate upon the topic or theme.
Research is adequate and timely for the topic.
The paper is written in such a way that the context and purpose it clear to the reader |
62 - 1 points Key elements of the assignment are missing or not covered effectively
Content is lacking in comprehension and/or accuracy
Major points are not stated clearly and/or not supported by research
Source material are not used to elaborate upon the topic or theme.
Research is inadequate for the topic.
The paper is written in such a way that the context and purpose is not clear to the reader. |
0 points
Not present in the paper at the master educational level |
|
Organization and Structure 30 points |
30 - 26 points The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
Ideas flow in a logical sequence
The structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
The paper’s organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose.
Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and direct the flow of thought throughout the paper.
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas and reviews the major points toward the appropriate audience. |
25- 21 points The introduction provides background on the topic and major points.
Most Ideas flow in a logical sequence
The structure of the paper is clear
The paper’s organization demonstrates a central theme or purpose.
Paragraph transitions are present. The conclusion derives from the paper’s ideas and reviews the major points. |
20 - 1 points The introduction does not provides background on the topic and major points in a substantial way.
Ideas do not flow a logical sequence
The structure of the paper is not clear and is difficult to follow
The paper’s lacks a central theme or purpose.
Paragraph transitions are missing. The conclusion does not derives from the paper’s ideas and/or reviews the major points. |
0 points
Not present in the paper at the master educational level |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced 92-100% (A) |
Proficient 84-91% (B) |
Developing 1-83% (< C) |
Not present |
|
Formatting and Research 20 points |
20 - 18.4 points The paper includes Title page, 1-page Abstract and 5–7 full pages of content
The reference page(s) contains 10 scholarly citations.
The paper follows appropriate citation format guidelines.
The paper is written in 11pt, Arial font, double-spaced and 1” margins
The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas. |
18.3 - 16 points The paper includes Title page, 1-page Abstract and 5–7 full pages of content
The reference page(s) contains 10 scholarly citations.
Most of the paper follows appropriate citation format guidelines.
The paper is written in 11pt, Arial font, double-spaced and 1” margins
Most of the work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas. |
15.9 - 1 points The paper is missing one of more of the following: Title page, 1-page Abstract and 5–7 full pages of content
The reference page(s) is lacking 10 scholarly citations.
The paper does not follows appropriate citation format guidelines.
The paper is not written in 11pt, Arial font, double-spaced and 1” margins
The work is not original and fails to giving credit to all borrowed ideas. |
0 points
Not present in the paper at the master educational level |
|
Mechanical structure and Readability 25 points |
25 - 23 points Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed and spelling is correct.
Sentences are complete, clear and concise.
Sentences are well constructed with consistently strong and varied structure.
Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought.
Words used are precise and unambiguous. |
22.9 - 20 points The paper has a limited number of issues with grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation.
Most Sentences are complete, clear and concise.
Most Sentences are well constructed with consistently strong and varied structure.
Most Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought.
Words used are precise and unambiguous. |
19.9 - 1 points Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are not followed and spelling is not corrected.
Sentences are complete, clear and concise.
Sentences are well constructed with consistently strong and varied structure.
Sentence transitions are not present and the flow of thought is inconsistent.
Words used are not precise and unambiguous. |
0 points
Not present in the paper at the master educational level |
|
Instructors comments:
|
/150 |