Exercise / Sport Analysis on a Volleyball Player
Final Project Analysis Course: Exercise Physiology Section 01 Spring Semester 2022 CO
Criteria Good to Excellent 10 points
Average to Good 7 points
Needs Improvement 4 points
Criterion Score
Skill description / 10
Metabolism / 10
Cardiovascular / 10
All required
information is
present and
accurate.
Information is well
developed with
significant depth
and detail.
Most required
information is
present, but may
have some
inaccuracies.
Information is
occasionally
supported with
depth and detail.
Missing some
required information
and contains
inaccurate
explanations.
Information is not
supported with
depth or detail
frequently
All required
information is
present and
accurate.
Information is well
developed with
significant depth
and detail.
Most required
information is
present, but may
have some
inaccuracies.
Information is
occasionally
supported with
depth and detail.
Missing some
required information
and contains
inaccurate
explanations.
Information is not
supported with
depth or detail
frequently
All required
information is
present and
accurate.
Information is well
developed with
significant depth
and detail.
Most required
information is
present, but may
have some
inaccuracies.
Information is
occasionally
supported with
depth and detail.
Missing some
required information
and contains
inaccurate
explanations.
Information is not
supported with
depth or detail
frequently
Criteria Good to Excellent 10 points
Average to Good 7 points
Needs Improvement 4 points
Criterion Score
Respiratory / 10
Neuromuscular / 10
Summary / 10
All required
information is
present and
accurate.
Information is well
developed with
significant depth
and detail.
Most required
information is
present, but may
have some
inaccuracies.
Information is
occasionally
supported with
depth and detail.
Missing some
required information
and contains
inaccurate
explanations.
Information is not
supported with
depth or detail
frequently
All required
information is
present and
accurate.
Information is well
developed with
significant depth
and detail.
Most required
information is
present, but may
have some
inaccuracies.
Information is
occasionally
supported with
depth and detail.
Missing some
required information
and contains
inaccurate
explanations.
Information is not
supported with
depth or detail
frequently
All required
information is
present and
accurate.
Information is well
developed with
significant depth
and detail.
Most required
information is
present, but may
have some
inaccuracies.
Information is
occasionally
supported with
depth and detail.
Missing some
required information
and contains
inaccurate
explanations.
Information is not
supported with
depth or detail
frequently
Criteria Good to Excellent 20 points
Average to Good 15 points
Needs Improvement 11 points
Criterion Score
Total / 80
Overall Score
Criteria Good to Excellent 20 points
Average to Good 15 points
Needs Improvement 11 points
Criterion Score
Writing Style and
Mechanics
/ 20Major ideas are clearly introduced
and flow smoothly
from one to another
in the order put
forth in the
instructions.
Transitions/section
headings make the
organization clear
and easy to follow.
No grammar or
spelling errors. Well
written in paragraph
form, in-text
citations are
present, clear, easy
to follow.
References are all
form academic
sources and
formatted
consistently.
Major ideas are
generally clear and
related to one
another, and flow in
the order put forth
in the instructions.
Transitions/section
headings are
evident, but not
perfected.
Occasional grammar
or spelling errors.
Adequately written
in a paragraph form,
contains some in-
text citations, clear,
reasonably easy to
follow. References
are mostly from
academic sources
and are formatted
appropriately.
Paper is
disorganized, does
not follow a logical
flow set forth in the
instructions. Major
ideas are
disconnected and
lacking
transitions/section
headings making the
paper difficult to
read.
Many grammar and
spelling errors
distract the reader.
Poorly written,
lacking in-text
citations and format,
unclear, hard to
follow. Paper
contains evidence of
plagiarism. Lacks
references following
a set format and/or
not from academic
sources.
Exceeds Expectations 68 points minimum
Meets Expectations 56 points minimum
Below Expectations 0 points minimum