LD 2
The assessment has been returned. Please read my comments and make corrections in RED on the paper before resubmitting. If you have any questions, let me know. I hope you have a good day!
Learning Objective 1.1: Explain how to organize effective teams.
Explanation is vague or incomplete.
Criterion Feedback
explanation of how to pair the teachers in the scenario with a rationale for the choices, supported by logical connections to the professional knowledge base. Which educators are paired together? A relevant example from personal or professional experience needed
Learning Objective 2.1: Apply strategies for addressing conflict.
Response includes a clear explanation of strategies to handle the conflicts in all three scenarios.
Strategies are supported by logical connections to the professional knowledge base.
Criterion Feedback
A relevant example from personal or professional experience needed
Learning Objective 3.1: Describe strategies used to build consensus among teams.
Response provides a clear description of two relevant strategies for building consensus.
Strategies are supported by logical connections to the professional knowledge base.
Criterion Feedback
A relevant example from personal or professional experience needed
Learning Objective 4.1: Describe strategies for fostering a team approach to problem solving and decision making.
Description includes two relevant strategies for fostering a team approach to problem solving and decision making. Strategies are supported by logical connections to the professional knowledge base.
Criterion Feedback
A relevant example from personal or professional experience needed
Learning Objective 5.1: Describe strategies for responding to cultural differences among teams.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: More than two relevant strategies for responding to cultural diversity among the staff in the scenario.
Criterion Feedback
nice strategies
Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.
Grammar, spelling, and mechanics reflect a high level of accuracy in standard American English and enhance readability.
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.
Writing is consistently well organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow
Written Communication PS 1.3: Support writing with appropriate resources.
Writing effectively integrates appropriate resources (which may include peer-reviewed resources) and content to support and expand upon ideas and arguments.
Written Communication PS 1.4: Apply APA style to written work.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
Written Communication PS 1.5: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.
Vocabulary and tone are consistently tailored to the audience and effectively and directly support communication of key concepts.
Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.
Response justifies the reasonableness and need for assumptions in an original argument.
Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.
Response presents compelling supporting arguments for proposed solutions.
|
Score |
|
|
Not Yet Achieved |