Economics of Financial Crises 10 pages essay

Not a good title. A paper should have a point.  See How to Write a Good Paper.  The point could be expressed in the title.

As it stands, I would give you only 1 point out of 5. You have time to submit a revised paper. 

You should try to keep your arguments clear.  Show that you understand how the IMF worked under Bretton Woods and how it works under the current regime with widespread floating.

1. p2. You don't explain how a managed float differs from a pure float. It's very simple, but you don't explain it.

2. p. 3. The IMF is not an insight.  Same page: the Bretton Woods system was one of fixed exchange rates. 

3. You don't lay out the simple arguments for and against flexible exchange rates. 

4. I inserted a few comments in the paper. 

If you want to resubmit, I will need to clear your attempt so that you can submit a new one.