failedassignment.docx

2

Senior Capstone - Motomart 500896

Criteria Grade

Content 80 pts

■ Step 1 – Provides comments on 5 year income statement (worth 10 points) 8 points

■ Step 2 – Discuss patterns in expense items (worth 10 points) 0 points

■ Step 3 – Identify high and low activity levels (worth 10 points) 10 points

■ Step 4 – Compute cost equations (worth 30 points) 0 points

■ Step 5 - Summarize your findings (worth 20 points) 20 points

38 %

Written Communication 10 pts

■ Answers each question in complete sentences leading to well-structured responses to each Step listed above.

■ Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure

■ Provides clear organization by using words like first, however, on the other hand, and so on, consequently, since, next, and when

■ Makes sure the paper contains no typographical errors

8 %

Format 10 pts

The paper is double-spaced, typed in font size 12. It includes the student’s:

■ Name and address

■ Student number, Course title and number, and project number

10 %

Total Grade

56 %

Since this is a failing grade, you are required to rework and resubmit the project for final grading.

For Step 4:

You included the Excel file; however, the file does not show the work necessary to support the figures presented in Step 4. (So how did you arrive at those figures?) No work (Excel file included as part of the submission) to support the figures – no credit given.

Case 2 - Motomart

Step 1 Comment by Burcicki, Jim: Missing what is wrong with the data.

Year

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

Trend of Operating Profit

263,828

112,314

-96,699

-94,345

-526,092

Trend of SF Expense

1,172,933

1,665,769

1,892,499

1,870,782

2,161,220

Trend in Net Variable Revenues

2,885,969

3,828,255

4,086,667

3,940,799

4,298,748

Trend in Total Fixed Expense

1,449,208

2,050,172

2,290,867

2,164,362

2,653,620

Using data from Table 2-4 that presents the financial and cost driver information produced by Motomart, the company`s operating profits are seen to decline drastically from 1984 to 1988 resulting in high losses, but in 1987, the company`s loss slightly reduced compared to the 1986 figure before further and more heavy losses in 1988. When looking at the semi-fixed expenses highlighted in Table 2, the S-F expenses appear to be significantly increasing from 1984 to 1988. Also, in this case, 1987 presents a slightly different result of reducing costs before the trend resumed in 1988. This declining pattern went from 43% to a (-196%). The increasing trend of semi-fixed expenses is because of the increase in net variable revenues. Besides, the net variables revenues do not increase as fast as the total fixed expenses, and thus the fixed costs had a high impact on the trend of the semi-fixed expenses.

Step 2 Comment by Burcicki, Jim: Did not identify the unusual pattern with the data nor the 4 items which are wrong with the data.

In looking at Table 3, the semi-fixed expenses highlight odd patterns that are unexpected. All the semi-fixed expenses are expected to increase as the net variable expenses increase; however, some of the costs do not decline or increased and later fell. For instance, vacation reduced from 1985 to 1988 after increasing only in 1984 despite the net variable revenues increase. Besides, the demonstrators’ expense presented a declining and mixed trends throughout the five-year period. The 1st month total expenses increased by $97,860, and then in the 2nd month another $7,475. Then a decline in the 4th month to $75,584.

Semi-Fixed (S-F) Expenses: Comment by Burcicki, Jim: Why is this here? It is not a part of Step 2.

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

Salaries

613006

968789

1211464

1289758

1360489

Vacation

600

26705

19468

19058

18268

Advertising

210226

288347

281219

309608

371314

Supplies/Tools/Laundry

31473

46141

75468

65935

81252

Freight

5719

5987

6528

5731

4663

Vehicle

22913

23718

23664

20370

19483

Demonstrators

10465

4969

-1513

4192

707

Floor-Planning

278531

301113

276201

156129

305044

Total SF Expense

1172933

1665769

1892499

1870781

2161220

Step 3

The semi-fixed expenses` high and low points do not represent the five-year activity and the separation into a variable, and the fixed element will not be correct if the high and low points methods of the fixed expenses are matched with the NRV`s high and low points.

 Semi fixed expenses

 High

 Low

NVR

280

31

Salaries

128,007

45,491

Vacation

9,212

0

Advertising

38,616

9,112

Supplies/Tools/Laundry

14,426

(684)

Freight

1,628

(492)

Vehicle

3,175

486

Demonstrators

4,517

(3,513)

Floor-Planning

188,040

(78,173)

Total

387,901

2,772

A different option of determining the fixed and variable elements of semi-fixed expenses would be by using the total amount of semi-fixed expenses. The figures from 1998 and 1984 can be utilized as high points and low points respectively. Using the equation y = a + bx, whereas a represents the fixed costs while b accounts for the variable costs, but when the high-low point method is used, the variable cost would be 70% of net variable revenues while the fixed cost could present negative figures. The fixed costs will be 1172933- 2885969*.7 = -847245 and the variable cost = 988287/1412779 = 70%. In conclusion, the statistical method is best suited to determine the fixed and variable cost elements when compared to the high-low method.

 

NVR

SF

High

4298748

2161220

Low

2885969

1172933

Difference

1412779

988287

Another choice to decide settled and variable component of SF costs is to consider aggregate of the SF costs. The 1988 figures will be utilized as high point and 1984 will be utilized as low 16 ounces. The condition of y = a + bx will be utilized, the b will be the variable cost and the a will be the settled cost, yet when we utilize the high low point strategy the variable cost is around 70% of net variable incomes and the settled cost comes in negative. The low and high expenses provide values for the company that can be used to estimate the fixed and the variable costs of the total semi fixed expenses but, not the real data as it only compares the two extremes.

Step 4

 

FC

VC

R-Sq

1 Salaries

$106,866

-$110

4.07

2 Vacation

-$3,022

-$1

0.17%

3 Advertising and training

$21,654

-$8

0.00%

4 Supplies/tools/laundry

$6,849

-$16

9.28%

5 Freight

$709

$ 1

1.17%

6 Vehicles

$1,576

$ -

0.03 %

7 Demonstrators

$23,182

-$128

3.85%

8 Floor planning

$105,247

-$428

28.31%

9 Total

$263,059

-$692

24.67%

The major problem encountered was the fact that there the variable costs presented negative figures, and the data was too many for a quick and error-free analysis. Moreover, the NRV was used as a base instead of units of output, a factor which was not an accurate representation of the actual activity.

The R-squared measures are low and other times they dropped to zero, signifying that using the NRV as a base was not an appropriate base. Most of the slopes were negative. The conclusions are not consistent with the high-low effort as the high-low effort shows fixed costs in negative form as the use of regression produced negative variable costs.

Step 5

In looking at the financial data of Motomart, the change of semi-fixed expenses cannot only be linked to an activity change. For instance, if an individual cost of a product or service is increased yearly after a particular agreement and the producing firm manufacturers the same quantity in the next year, there will be an increase in the fixed cost. It implies that the change associated with the fixed cost cannot be tied to the change in the number of units produced(Dontoh, Ronen &Sarath, 2013). Thus, when there is a presentation of next year`s costs it means that the cost is variable, but this is not the case observed in Motomart. Furthermore, the case of Motomart has incorporated the use of NRV in determining both fixed and variable elements of semi-fixed expenses, which is not suitable. Hence, determining the fixed and variable elements of the semi-fixed expenses of Motomart using high low and regression methods was not possible. Thus, the data of the company cannot be used to come up with a reliable and appropriate financial forecast. Besides, if Motomart were included in the extensive database required to prepare the financial forecast that supports the relocation, the information would not be reliable. An appropriate means of determining the elements would be to use the machine hours, labor hours, or some units produced to come up with a clear image of the elements. It is not possible to ascertain that Motomart was not maintaining its financial records to be used as an appropriate development to produce economic forecasts and estimate costs for proposed or future retail dealership sites. It cannot also be determined if Motomart reverses its adjusting journal entries after preparing the annual financials.