The personality Paradox
|
Similarities
|
||
|
Humanistic |
Psychoanalytic |
social/cognitive |
|
This approach has reflected from personal experience and behavior. |
Approach on human think and daily activity which reflected from childhood experience and behavior. |
This approach has reflected from personal communication and behavior. |
|
Approach show situation, behavior, style, which you have taken decision based on this approach. |
Approach show person’s behavior, thinking style, instant decision taking abilities. |
Develop personality typology, personality traits, thinking styles and learning styles in a way to improve knowledge of motivation and behavior of self and others, in the workplace and beyond. |
|
Difference |
||
|
The humanistic approach of personality focuses on psychological growth and personal awareness. |
The psychoanalytic approach of personality focuses on childhood experience and the unconscious mind. |
The social cognitive perspective of personality focuses on observational learning, situational influence and self-efficacy. |
|
It takes a more positive outlook on human nature and is centered on how each person can achieve their individual potential. |
This perspective was created by psychiatrist Sigmund Freud, who believed that things are hidden in the unconscious, which could be revealed in a number of different ways, dreams, free association and slips of the tongue. |
His theory emphasized the role of conscious process thoughts including self-efficacy, theoretical experience and our abilities. |
Psychoanalytic approach: Personality theorists are concerned with identifying generalizations that can be made about consistent individual differences between people’s behavior currently we select to describe psychoanalytic.
A psychoanalytic approach are developed by Sigmund Freud developed that emphasized the role of the unconscious or the thoughts, feeling, memories and wishes that reside outside of awareness activity in regulating behavior. For testing the psychoanalytic approach produced hypothetical models of the structure of the mind by Freud, how are personality works and the ways in which it develops. This approach is not testable on modern scientific psychology. Personality has their origins in every language. Freud suggested three main three main structures within our psychoanalytic model: the id, ego and superego. The id is the part of the personality that operates on the pleasure principle and always looking to reduce the tension that comes from basic physiological drives. The ego makes responsible for interacting with conscious reality of personality, while the ego is governed by the reality principle. The reality principle consider as the ego will defer pleasure until a reasonable way to satisfy id instincts is available. Another the superego is the internalization of parental and social values. The superego is governed by the perfection principle. The perfection principle shows the image of perfect person or ego, which inspires the superego. The superego makes well done when we do well otherwise feel shame or guilt.
2. The question of “Nature versus Nurture” comes up often when trying to explain human behavior, from intelligence to personality to relationship behavior. Thinking of the different suspects, in this case, come up with one clear example where nature (biological factors) may have an impact on a person’s personality.
Human personality is primarily influenced by past experience and training. They acquire all or most of their behavioral traits from nurture are well known as blank slate.
Biological factor has growth more in personality than adoptive factor in siblings. However Adoption factor directly measure the strength of shared family effects and adopt sibling only family environment. Biological factor are determined by genetic inheritance such as color of eyes, curly hair, color of body, pigmentation of the skin are all a function of the genes we inherit. These facts have led many to speculate mind as to whether psychological characteristics such as behavioral tendencies, thinking, personality attributes and mental abilities are also “wired in” before we are even born.
Unexpectedly, some adoption cases indicate that by adulthood the personalities of adopted siblings are no more similar than ability of family. This would mean that shared family effects on personality wane off by adulthood. This type case with personality, non-shared environmental effects are often found to out-weigh shared environmental effects. That is, environmental effects that are typically thought to be life-shaping (such as family life) may have less of an impact than non-shared effects, which are harder to identify.
Basic assumption is that the characteristics of the human species and behavior as a whole are a product of evolution that individual differences, due to each person’s have unique genetic code. In general, the earlier a particular ability appears, the more likely it is to be under the influence of genetic factors.
For example, when an infant forms an attachment of heart it is responding to the love and attention it has received, language comes from imitating the speech of others people and cognitive development depends on the degree of stimulation in the environment, social activity, experience and more broadly, on the civilization within which the child is reared.
3. Now, think of one where nurture (or experiential factors) may have an impact. You’ve narrowed down the pool of suspects yet again, this time by analyzing the personalities of each. Write a brief summary about how the different theories or perspectives on personality enabled you to draw your conclusion.
There are various theories are impact human life and personal growth. They effect directly or indirectly by these theories. Numerous personality theories exist but most of the four major perspectives theories cover all theories. Each of these perspectives on personality attempts to describe different patterns in personality, including how these patterns form and how people differ on an individual level.
Understanding personality growth analysis is helpful for appreciating, while people are different behavior, everyone has a unique value and special strengths and qualities that everyone should treated with care and respect. People are rarely set out to cause upset - they just behave differently because they are different. All theories and tests are useful also for management, learning, selection, training and teaching.
The Psychoanalytic theories focus childhood experience and unconscious mind of personality, Which people always act as play child role, they did not emphasize corporate experience. In Humanistic Perspective theories of personality are focuses on psychological growth, development and personal awareness. It takes a more positive outlook on human nature and is centered on how each person can achieve their individual potential. By trait perspective theories of personality is centered on identifying, generalize, describing and measuring the specific traits( leadership, motivation, helping other and empathy) that make up human personality. By understanding these traits, researchers believe they can better comprehend the differences between individuals development. Other social cognitive theories of personality understand that how to give the importance of observational learning, playing and acting, self-efficacy, situational influences and cognitive processes in life.