Help Me please
Evaluation Argument Rubric
Concerns Areas that Need
Work
Criteria Standards for This Performance
Advanced Evidence of Exceeding
Standards Content
The writer presents a focused and organized content. Clear and recognizable criteria, by which the writer evaluates his/her topic, provides focus and direction to the essay. Information presented reveals the writer fully understands the material and the implications beyond the immediate subject. Sources are used to support and inform the writer’s own development of ideas Reasoning is solid and supported by effective use of the rhetorical appeals. Inferences are accurate and supported by specific examples.
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs are coherent and easy to follow.
Mechanics & Grammar Mechanical and grammar errors are minimal to absent, and do not distract the reader from understanding the intended focus of the essay.
Vocabulary and word usage is appropriate and reflects that of university level writing.
Format MLA or APA Format Typed & double spaced Courier New Font Sources are cited properly both in text and in the bibliography.
0-79 80-96 97-100
Design Copyright 2014 by Cult of Pedagogy
Evaluation Argument Rubric
Concerns Areas that Need
Work
Criteria Standards for This Performance
Advanced Evidence of Exceeding
Standards Content
The writer presents a focused and organized content. Clear and recognizable criteria, by which the writer evaluates his/her topic, provides focus and direction to the essay. Information presented reveals the writer fully understands the material and the implications beyond the immediate subject. Sources are used to support and inform the writer’s own development of ideas Reasoning is solid and supported by effective use of the rhetorical appeals. Inferences are accurate and supported by specific examples.
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs are coherent and easy to follow.
Mechanics & Grammar Mechanical and grammar errors are minimal to absent, and do not distract the reader from understanding the intended focus of the essay.
Vocabulary and word usage is appropriate and reflects that of university level writing.
Format MLA or APA Format Typed & double spaced Courier New Font Sources are cited properly both in text and in the bibliography.
0-79 80-96 97-100
Design Copyright 2014 by Cult of Pedagogy
Evaluation Argument Rubric
Concerns Areas that Need
Work
Criteria Standards for This Performance
Advanced Evidence of Exceeding
Standards Content
The writer presents a focused and organized content. Clear and recognizable criteria, by which the writer evaluates his/her topic, provides focus and direction to the essay. Information presented reveals the writer fully understands the material and the implications beyond the immediate subject. Sources are used to support and inform the writer’s own development of ideas Reasoning is solid and supported by effective use of the rhetorical appeals. Inferences are accurate and supported by specific examples.
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs are coherent and easy to follow.
Mechanics & Grammar Mechanical and grammar errors are minimal to absent, and do not distract the reader from understanding the intended focus of the essay.
Vocabulary and word usage is appropriate and reflects that of university level writing.
Format MLA or APA Format Typed & double spaced Courier New Font Sources are cited properly both in text and in the bibliography.
0-79 80-96 97-100
Design Copyright 2014 by Cult of Pedagogy
Evaluation Argument Rubric
Concerns Areas that Need
Work
Criteria Standards for This Performance
Advanced Evidence of Exceeding
Standards Content
The writer presents a focused and organized content. Clear and recognizable criteria, by which the writer evaluates his/her topic, provides focus and direction to the essay. Information presented reveals the writer fully understands the material and the implications beyond the immediate subject. Sources are used to support and inform the writer’s own development of ideas Reasoning is solid and supported by effective use of the rhetorical appeals. Inferences are accurate and supported by specific examples.
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs are coherent and easy to follow.
Mechanics & Grammar Mechanical and grammar errors are minimal to absent, and do not distract the reader from understanding the intended focus of the essay.
Vocabulary and word usage is appropriate and reflects that of university level writing.
Format MLA or APA Format Typed & double spaced Courier New Font Sources are cited properly both in text and in the bibliography.
0-79 80-96 97-100
Design Copyright 2014 by Cult of Pedagogy
Evaluation Rubric.docx.pdf Saved to Dropbox • Mar 23, 2018 at 1?52 PM