Estimations, Predictions and Strengths

BabyTazz21
EstimationandPrediction.docx

Estimation and Prediction

Consider the following pairs of problems that look at automobile age and value.

Table 6.4 Data on Age and Value of Used Automobiles of a Specific Make and Model

x

2

3

3

3

4

4

5

5

5

6

y

28.7

24.8

26.0

30.5

23.8

24.6

23.8

20.4

21.6

22.1

 

Problem 1

1. Estimate the average value of all 4-year-old automobiles of this make and model.

2. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the average value of all 4-year-old automobiles of this make and model.

Problem 2

1. Shylock intends to buy a 4-year-old automobile of this make and model next week. Predict the value of the first such automobile that he encounters.

2. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the value of the first such automobile that he encounters.

The method of solution and answer to the first question in each pair, 1a. and 2a., are the same. When we set x equal to 4 in the least squares regression equation

which corresponds to value $24,630, is an estimate of precisely the number sought in question 1a.: the mean E(y) of all y values when = 4. Because nothing is known about the first 4-year-old automobile of this make and model that Shylock will encounter, our best guess as to its value is the mean value E(y) of all such automobiles, the number 24.63 or $24,630, computed in the same way.

The answers to the second part of each question differ. In question 1b., we are trying to estimate a population parameter: the mean of the all the y-values in the subpopulation picked out by the value x = 4, that is, the average value of all 4-year-old automobiles. In question 2b., however, we are not trying to capture a fixed parameter, but the value of the random variable y in one trial of an experiment: examine the first 4-year-old car Shylock encounters. In the first case we seek to construct a confidence interval in the same sense that we have done before. In the second case, the situation is different, and the interval constructed has a different name, prediction interval. In the second case, we are trying to “predict” where the value of a random variable will take its value.

The formula for the prediction interval is identical except for the presence of the number 1 underneath the square root sign. This means that the prediction interval is always wider than the confidence interval at the same confidence level and value of x. In practice, the presence of the number 1 tends to make it much wider.

Example 1

x

2

3

3

3

4

4

5

5

5

6

y

28.7

24.8

26.0

30.5

23.8

24.6

23.8

20.4

21.6

22.1

 

Using the data values in the table above for the "Age and Value of Used Automobiles of a Specific Make and Model," construct a 95% confidence interval for the average value of all 3.5-year-old automobiles of this make and model.

Example 2

Table 6.5 Data on Age and Value of Used Automobiles of a Specific Make and Model

x

2

3

3

3

4

4

5

5

5

6

y

28.7

24.8

26.0

30.5

23.8

24.6

23.8

20.4

21.6

22.1

 

Using the sample data to construct a 95% prediction interval for the predicted value of a randomly selected 3.5-year-old automobile of this make and model.

Solution

The computations for this example are identical to those of the previous example, except that now there is the extra number 1 beneath the square root sign. Because we were careful to record the intermediate results of that computation, we have immediately that the 95% prediction interval is

which gives the interval (21.017, 30.293).

We are 95% confident that the value of a randomly selected 3.5-year-old vehicle of this make and model is between $21,017 and $30,293.

Note what an enormous difference the presence of the extra number 1 under the square root sign made. The prediction interval is about 2.5 times wider than the confidence interval at the same level of confidence.

Note. Adapted from “Estimation and Prediction,” by Shafer, Zhang, 2012, Introductory Statistics, Chapter 10, Section 7. Copyright 2012 Flat World Knowledge, Inc.