|
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
INTRODUCTION
Background/History
Thesis Statement
|
Well-developed introduction that engages the reader and creates interest in the topic. Clear thesis statement and placement of topic in historical context.
|
Introduction places topic in historical context. Thesis states the position.
|
Introduction attempts to place topic in historical context but lacks clarity. Thesis statement unclear.
|
Lacks historical context, or the context is misinterpreted. No clear thesis statement.
|
MAIN POINTS
Development of thesis and evidence in support of it
|
Well-developed points that directly relate to thesis. Supporting evidence is clear, relevant, and detailed enough to inform the reader.
|
Points are clear but not developed in detail. Supporting evidence is relevant but not always clearly presented.
|
Main points are there but lack clarity. Supporting evidence not effectively linked to the main points.
|
Poor development of ideas. Lack of evidence in support of points.
|
ORGANIZATION
Structure
Transitions
|
Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transitions are mature and graceful.
|
Logical progression of ideas. Transitions are present but not always clear enough to connect issues.
|
Essay does not always proceed logically. Unclear transitions.
|
No discernable organization. Lack of clear transitions.
|
STYLE AND MECHANICS
Sentence flow, variety
Spelling, punctuation, capitalization
|
Writing is smooth, skillful, coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Punctuation, spelling, capitalization and grammar are correct.
|
Writing is clear and sentences have some variation in structure. Some errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, and capitalization.
|
Writing is somewhat unclear and sentences lack variety. Major errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, capitalization.
|
Writing is confusing, hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. Distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, capitalization.
|
CONCLUSION
|
Conclusion effectively wraps up and goes beyond restating the thesis.
|
Conclusion summarizes topics but does not explore implications.
|
Conclusion is recognizable but lacks clarity and discussion of implications.
|
Conclusion does not summarize main points or is missing altogether.
|
CITATION OF SOURCES
Foot/endnotes, bibliography
|
Proper citation of sources with appropriate formatting of notes and bibliography.
|
Citation of sources and clear bibliography, some formatting errors.
|
Inconsistent citation of sources, and formatting errors.
|
Lacks source citations.
|