Essay 2
Essay #2 - Rhetorical Analysis Instructions
After reading Chapter 6 in Everything's an Argument and choosing an article from Chapter 23, you are ready to write your Rhetorical Analysis essay.
In our text, Everything's an Argument, choose and read one of the articles found in Chapter 23: How does Popular Culture Stereotype You? You will write the Rhetorical Analysis on the article you choose. Take time to annotate and summarize the article, noting important points in the author’s argument.
***You may NOT use “Making a Visual Argument: Cartoons and Stereotypes.”***
A rhetorical analysis examines an article and analyzes how the author of the article creates their argument noting where it is effective or ineffective. The focus of a rhetorical analysis is more on how the argument is created, rather than the topic. You will need to use the concepts of ethos, pathos, and logos to dissect the article you read as well as analyze the author’s purpose, intended audience, and writing style. By understanding and analyzing another person’s argument, you can better understand how to create your own arguments as well as analyze arguments for research purposes. Review the examples on pp. 105-111.
Use the following guidelines to help you draft the rhetorical analysis:
1. Re-read the article and answer the questions on pp 89-90 of Everything's an Argument.
2. Create a list of what is effective and ineffective about the way the claim in the article is presented. Consider how the article is written and why the author wrote the article in this way.
3. Form your own claim/opinion about the article. This will be your thesis. (Remember your thesis should be about how the author creates and supports their argument. Your thesis statement might look like this: "In this article, John Doe makes a strong case for the need to censor minor's social media accounts by providing relevant examples, ...")
4. Organize the support for your claim by creating an outline of your body paragraphs.
5. Write a rough draft starting with an introduction that includes a very brief summary of the article you are analyzing and end the first paragraph with your thesis statement. The body paragraphs should defend your thesis statement by providing your own unique ideas and interpretations of the article as well as examples from the article itself.
6. The last page of your rough draft should be a Work's Cited page with the citation of the article you are analyzing.
7. Once your rough draft is complete, follow the instructions to post and reply to the discussion board.
8. Once your rough draft is complete, submit it to Tutor.com to get feedback on the draft.
These steps MUST be completed by the middle of the week in order to get Tutor.com and peer comments in time to submit and use for revision.
Revision and Editing Checklist:
Use this list to check that your essay is following the core grading criteria.
A. _____ Is the essay 3-4 pages with MLA formatting?
B. _____ Is the information from the article analyzed and documented effectively using in-text citations and works cited?
C. _____ Does the essay fully answer the assignment given?
D. _____ Does the writer avoid grammatical errors?
E. _____ Is the essay logically organized and have a clear, well-structured thesis?
F. _____ Is the topic and focus of the paper clear throughout?
G. _____ Does the writer provide quality and unique examples and evidence as support?
Rhetorical Analysis Essay Scoring Rubric
|
|
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Needs Improvement |
Ineffective |
Not Demonstrated |
Total |
|
Clarity/Quality of Argument (30) |
In addition to meeting expectations, writer produces highly effective work by means as established by the instructor
30-27 |
Focus of essay is argumentative and remains consistent and easy to follow throughout the essay
26-24 |
Focus of essay is largely consistent and argumentative but may wander off topic briefly or struggle to clearly rebut counterclaims
23-21 |
Focus of essay is inconsistent or only vaguely argument-ative and difficult to follow; writer may contradict own claims
20-18 |
Writer fails to focus on any one clear topic and/or does not make an argumentative claim
17-0 |
______/30 |
|
Comments:
|
|
|||||
|
Development & Organization of Analysis (30) |
In addition to meeting expectations, writer produces highly effective work by means as established by the instructor
30-27 |
Analysis is developed logically, with clear connection to the central claim and organized so that it is easy for the reader to follow
26-24 |
Ideas lack consistent development or struggle to logically connect to the central claim or may be organized ineffectively
23-21 |
Ideas fail to connect logically to one another or the central claim; writer may use claims that contradict central claim
20-18 |
Writer fails to develop any clear or reasonable ideas
17-0 |
______/30 |
|
Comments:
|
|
|||||
|
Use of Scholarly Evidence & Support (30) |
In addition to meeting expectations, writer produces highly effective work by means as established by the instructor
30-27 |
Writer selects appropriate, effective primary and secondary evidence and uses it clearly and correctly to support claims
26-24 |
Writer selects evidence that may not clearly support the claim, is not academically appropriate, or uses evidence in a way that does not connect clearly
23-21 |
Evidence selected does not support the claim and/or is used incorrectly or unclearly and/or fails to use secondary evidence
20-18 |
Writer fails to use evidence (if no textual evidence is quoted, the score for this category is automatically zero)
17-0 |
______/30 |
|
Comments:
|
|
|||||
|
MLA Format & Documenting (15) |
Essay flawlessly or very nearly flawlessly uses MLA formatting and documentation
15-14 |
Essay has only very minor flaws in MLA formatting and documentation
13-11 |
Essay has several flaws in MLA formatting and documentation
10-9 |
Essay has several glaring flaws in MLA formatting and documentation
8-7 |
Essay fails to format according to MLA style (Essays that fail to document are plagiarized and receive a zero)
6-0 |
______/15 |
|
Comments:
|
|
|||||
|
Mechanics (15) |
Essay flawlessly or nearly flawlessly uses Standard Written English
15-14 |
Essay has only minor flaws in using Standard Written English
13-11 |
Essay has several flaws in Standard Written English
10-9 |
Essay’s mechanical flaws make it difficult to follow or understand 8-7 |
Essay is unreadable
6-0 |
______/15 |
|
Comments:
|
|
|||||
|
OVERALL SCORE AND COMMENTS:
|
|