|
|
100%
|
75%
|
50%
|
0
|
|
DEFINITION OF SUPPLY CHAIN CLUSTERS – MAX 40 POINTS
|
Showed you clearly grasped the meaning of SCM Clusters. This included a full definition of SCM Clusters, their upstream and downstream functions, and at least 4 common characteristics (at least 6 sentences).
|
Showed you somewhat grasped the meaning of SCM Clusters. This included a partial definition of SCM Clusters, their upstream and downstream functions, and at least 3 common characteristics (at least 4 sentences).
|
Definition is somewhat vague and unorganized. Only included 2 common characteristics (at least 2 sentences).
|
Definition is extremely brief or missing altogether (one or no sentences).
|
|
ARGUMENT SUPPORTING SCM CLUSTERS TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE – MAX 70 POINTS
|
Showed you clearly argued
for supporting
the use of SCM Clusters today and in the future. This included at least 6 benefits for using clusters. Each benefit must be described in two sentences and contain industry/textbook/article concepts and terms (at least 12 sentences).
|
Showed you partially argued for supporting the use of SCM Clusters today and in the future. This included at least 4 benefits for using clusters. Each benefit must be described in two sentences and contain industry/textbook/article concepts and terms (at least 8 sentences).
|
Supporting argument is incomplete and only included 2 benefits (at least 4 sentences)
|
Supporting argument is extremely brief or missing altogether (one or no sentences).
|
|
ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION TO SCM CLUSTERS TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE – MAX 50 POINTS
|
Showed you clearly argued
the opposition for using
SCM Clusters today and in the future. This included at least 4 disadvantages/risks for using clusters. Each disadvantage/risk must be described in two sentences and contain industry/textbook/article concepts and terms (at least 8 sentences).
|
Showed you partially argued the opposition for using SCM Clusters today and in the future. This included at least 3 disadvantages/risks for using clusters. Each disadvantage/risk must be described in two sentences and contain industry/textbook/article concepts and terms (at least 6 sentences).
|
Opposing argument is incomplete and only included 2 disadvantages/risks (at least 4 sentences)
|
Opposing argument is extremely brief or missing altogether (one or no sentences).
|
|
COMPARE AND CONTRAST SCM CLUSTERS CITED IN THE “AMISH EXPERIENCE” ARTICLE WITH ANOTHER SUPPLY CHAIN CLUSTER OF YOUR CHOOSING - MAX 70 POINTS
|
Showed you listed and clearly described at least 3 the common attributes between the “Amish Clusters”
and
your chosen organization’s clusters. Showed you clearly described at least 3 contrasting attributes between these same two entities. Each comparison and contrast must be described in two sentences (at least two paragraphs of 6 sentences each; one paragraph for common attributes and one paragraph for contrasting attributes).
|
Showed you listed and clearly described at least 2 the common attributes between the “Amish Clusters” and your chosen organization’s clusters. Showed you clearly described at least 2 contrasting attributes between these same two entities. Each comparison and contrast must be described in two sentences (at least 8 sentences total).
|
C/C structure is incomplete and only included 1 similar and one different attribute (at least 4 sentences).
|
C/C structure is extremely brief or missing altogether (one or no sentences).
|
|
ORGANIZATION, GRAMMAR, SPELLING (OGS) - MAX 10 POINTS
|
Included all of the following: name, assignment, date, link/hard copy of selected comparison SCM Cluster, identified paper sections, proper use of grammar and correct spelling.
|
Included all but 1-2 of the OGS requirements.
|
Included only 2-3 of the OGS
|
Included 1 or less of the OGS requirements.
|