Education assistant
Promoting Resilience: A Preschool Intervention Enhances the Adolescent Adjustment of Children Exposed to Early Adversity
Michael T. Sanders, Janet A. Welsh, Karen L. Bierman, and Brenda S. Heinrichs Pennsylvania State University
Two hundred ninety-four children from low-income families (58% White, 17% Latinx, 25% Black; 54% girls; Mage � 4.49 years old at study entry) were recruited from Head Start classrooms to participate in a randomized-controlled trial of the project Research-based, Developmentally Informed (REDI) pre- school intervention and then followed longitudinally for 10 years through 9th grade. At study entry, parents reported on their children’s exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Youth reported on their feelings of social-emotional distress and school bonding after making the transition into middle school (7th grade) and high school (9th grade). Multilevel latent profile analyses revealed three profiles of adolescent distress and school bonding. Increased rates of ACEs in early childhood predicted membership in adolescent profiles characterized by heightened social-emotional distress and reduced levels of school bonding. The REDI intervention that focused on promoting early social-emotional and language skills in preschool moderated the impact of early ACEs on adolescent adjustment and promoted youth resilience, significantly buffering children from the negative impact of early ACEs on their levels of social-emotional distress and school bonding.
Impact and Implications This study illustrates the value of providing preschool social-emotional learning interventions to socio- economically disadvantaged children who have experienced multiple forms of adversity. Exposure to early trauma, family instability, and compromised parenting increases risk for later emotional distress, insecure social relationships, and school disengagement in adolescence. This study shows that children from low-income families who experienced high levels of early adversity were protected from these negative adolescent outcomes when they received the Research-based, Developmentally Informed (REDI) intervention: on average, these children showed similar levels of social-emotional distress and school bonding as children who did not experience extreme early adversity. By promoting early social-emotional interventions such as REDI, researchers and policymakers can positively impact the lives of many children.
Keywords: preschool intervention, social-emotional learning, adverse childhood experiences, adolescent adjustment, resilience
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000406.supp
Children growing up in poverty are especially likely to experi- ence adversity during the first five years of life, including parent– child separations, family violence, unstable housing, and parental
dysfunction that reduces early parenting support (Evans & Kim, 2013). This early adversity may leave children vulnerable to feel- ings of distress and insecurity in later life, particularly during high-stress events such as the transitions into middle and high school that most students undergo in early adolescence. Interven- tions implemented in the preschool context may foster later resil- ience to school stressors by helping children develop skills that support successful adaptation and coping, including the capacity to regulate their emotions and form supportive relationships with teachers and peers. This study evaluated associations between exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in early child- hood and later adolescent adjustment. In addition, it evaluated the degree to which the Research-based, Developmentally Informed (REDI) preschool intervention promoted resilience and buffered children against the negative effects of ACEs on levels of social- emotional distress and school bonding experienced in adolescence.
Michael T. Sanders, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State Uni- versity; Janet A. Welsh, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University; X Karen L. Bierman and Brenda S. Heinrichs, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.
This project was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant HD046064) and the Institute of Education Sciences (Grant R305B090007). The views expressed in this article are ours and do not necessarily represent the granting agencies. Appreciation is expressed to the teachers, students, parents, and program personnel who served as partners in this project in the Huntingdon, Blair, and York County Head Start Programs of Pennsylvania and the school districts supporting the longitudinal data collection.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael T. Sanders, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 247A Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: mts34@psu.edu
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
School Psychology © 2020 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 35, No. 5, 285–298 ISSN: 2578-4218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000406
285
Family Adversity and Youth Development
ACEs are traumatic or otherwise stressful experiences that ex- pose children to inconsistent and unpredictable threat and/or harm and reduce access to safe and secure sources of social and emo- tional support. Prior research has identified a broad set of ACEs that negatively affect development, including exposure to abuse (physical, sexual, and emotional) or neglect, domestic violence, parent– child separation, various forms of parental dysfunction (psychopathology, antisocial activity, cognitive impairment, sub- stance use), and community violence (Anda et al., 2006; Felitti et al., 1998). Children who grow up in poverty are disproportionately exposed to ACEs (Crouch, Probst, Radcliff, Bennett, & McKin- ney, 2019; Evans & Kim, 2013). ACEs have been linked with a host of negative outcomes for children, including poor health outcomes (Anda et al., 2006; Hughes et al., 2017), impaired social functioning (McEwen & McEwen, 2017), increased emotional distress and poor mental health (Patten et al., 2015; Petruccelli, Davis, & Berman, 2019), and school adjustment difficulties (Hair, Hanson, Wolfe, & Pollak, 2015).
Conceptually, exposure to ACEs in early childhood may in- crease later vulnerability to social-emotional distress and school adjustment difficulties by disrupting the development of the phys- iological systems that regulate adaptive stress responding (Evans & Kim, 2013). Frequent exposure to unpredictable, inconsistent, and threatening events along with reduced access to sensitive and responsive caregiving may impede the development of the pre- frontal cortex and delay the development of the self-regulatory structures that help children manage their emotions and control their attention and behavior (Blair & Raver, 2012). Exposure to ACEs in early childhood may also affect later functioning via more indirect pathways, primarily by their impact on parenting and parent– child relationships. For example, attachment theory posits that positive, consistent bonds with caregivers in early childhood help children predict, make sense of, and interact with their envi- ronment, especially in times of difficulty (Sroufe & Waters, 1977). Children internalize representations of these early caregiving ex- periences as they develop, and these internal working models affect the degree to which they experience feelings of inner secu- rity and efficacy versus feelings of insecurity and distress when faced with stressors (McCarthy & Maughan, 2010). Secure parent– child attachments may be impaired by ACEs, particularly those that impede effective parenting, such as parent– child separation or parent depression, substance use, or cognitive impairment (Cyr, Euser, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & Van Ijzendoorn, 2010; Steele et al., 2016). Children who experience high levels of ACEs in early childhood may remain emotionally and behaviorally reactive to stress as they get older (e.g., Lee & Hankin, 2009), creating an increased likelihood of social and emotional distress, reduced engagement with school members and peers, and feelings of vul- nerability. Feelings of distress and disengagement may be ampli- fied in early adolescence by developmental changes that include disruptions in social support associated with changes in school contexts.
Transition to Adolescence
Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by trans- formations in key areas of social-emotional functioning that, in the United States school system, typically co-occur with major tran-
sitions in school context. Most American students move from smaller, self-contained elementary classrooms to larger middle or junior high schools during preadolescence (11–12 years old). A similar shift takes place 3 years later for most students, as they transition from middle schools to larger high schools. At each of these school transitions, students experience increased expecta- tions for autonomous functioning in social and academic domains, along with decreases in the familiarity and predictability of rela- tionships with peers and teachers (Simmons & Blyth, 2017). Given the growth in size and importance of the peer group, young adolescents often experience increased concerns about acceptance and fitting in (Aikins, Bierman, & Parker, 2005), while the con- current physical and emotional changes that accompany puberty may amplify already-increased levels of stress (Simmons & Blyth, 2017).
The effects of early ACEs exposure may be particularly impact- ful and problematic during this early adolescent period of school transitions because early adversity may increase stress reactivity (Gunnar, Wewerka, Frenn, Long, & Griggs, 2009), predisposing youth to view the world as unsafe and unpredictable and compro- mising their ability to adaptively handle stressors (Breslau et al., 2014; McElroy & Hevey, 2014). School transitions may reduce the predictability and consistency in their everyday life and decrease the availability of both peer and adult sources of social-emotional support.
Childhood ACEs serve as a risk factor associated with adoles- cent social-emotional distress and interpersonal problems, includ- ing mental health problems (Schalinski et al., 2016; Sheffler, Stanley, & Sachs-Ericsson, 2020) and poor school engagement (Bellis et al., 2018; Bethell, Newacheck, Hawes, & Halfon, 2014). Social-emotional distress in adolescence is associated with con- current and future anxiety and depression (Lee & Hankin, 2009) and with elevated levels of risky adolescent behaviors, including substance use, sexual promiscuity, and poor behavioral adjustment (Hessler & Katz, 2010).
Because they often predispose children to view relationships and environments as unsafe or unpredictable, early ACEs can also affect children’s perceptions of and experiences in the school setting. ACEs may especially undermine school bonding, reflect- ing a student’s sense of connectedness to and belonging at school. Feeling insecure in their relationships with teachers and peers can increase feelings of vulnerability at school, contributing to less positive attitudes toward school and a diminished willingness to invest or engage in school-related activities (Bethell et al., 2014). Low levels of school bonding in adolescence are associated with elevated rates of truancy and school dropout (Maynard et al., 2017; Van Eck, Johnson, Bettencourt, & Johnson, 2017), poor academic achievement (Dotterer & Lowe, 2011), and problems with depres- sion and substance use (Wang & Peck, 2013). The failure to establish strong school bonds also deprives vulnerable youth of an important source of protective support demonstrated to buffer them against the negative effects of ACEs later in life (e.g., Clements-Nolle & Waddington, 2019; Forster, Gower, Borowsky, & McMorris, 2017). The current study sought to examine the impact of early ACEs on children’s perceptions of their own social-emotional distress and their experiences of school bonding in adolescence.
Previous research suggests that the social-emotional skills and attitudes and expectations that children have prior to their middle
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
286 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
school transition predict posttransition distress and school adjust- ment (Aikins et al., 2005; Kingery, Erdley, & Marshall, 2011). It is possible that early intervention focused on strengthening social- emotional skills and social relationships might buffer children during stressful school transitions and be of particular benefit to children who are vulnerable to feelings of distress associated with early ACEs exposure (Von Cheong, Sinnott, Dahly, & Kearney, 2017).
Promoting Resilience With Preschool Intervention
Intervening during early childhood to address the effects of ACEs may be strategic, with the potential to prevent or reduce the negative impact on the neurodevelopment of self-regulatory pro- cesses during the preschool years (Blair & Raver, 2012). Early interventions that improve socialization supports and that promote the social-emotional and self-regulatory skills that foster adaptive stress coping may be key strategies to help address the needs of children growing up in risky environments (Blaustein & Kin- niburgh, 2018). Fostering preschool language skills, particularly the capacity to label and talk about feelings as well as the ability to use language effectively to initiate and maintain supportive interpersonal relationships may also enhance self-regulation skills and build social supports (Ramsook, Welsh, & Bierman, 2020). Resilience in human development refers to good outcomes and positive adaptation in spite of threats to adaptation or development within a context of adversity (Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000; Masten, 2016). Since ACEs may be particularly damaging to children’s internal working models and emotion regulation, it follows that promoting emotion skills (e.g., emotion knowledge, emotional reasoning) along with social and self-regulation skills in early childhood may boost resilience for children exposed to early ACEs. Such early intervention might buffer the negative impact of ACEs later in life by helping children understand and cope with their emotions and manage relationships more adaptively, thus reducing the impact of negatively skewed internal working mod- els. Supporting this early intervention approach, a growing re- search base documents the efficacy of social-emotional learning (SEL) programs for promoting the social-emotional adjustment of preschool children growing up in poverty (see reviews by Bierman & Motamedi, 2015 and McClelland, Tominey, Schmitt, & Duncan, 2017).
Children in the present study were participants in the randomized-controlled efficacy trial of the REDI intervention which used an evidence-based preschool SEL program as its foundation. This SEL program, Preschool PATHS (Promoting Alternative THinking Strategies; Domitrovich, Cortes, & Green- berg, 2007), included teacher-led lessons on prosocial skills for friendship making, emotional understanding, self-control, and so- cial problem solving. Each week, teachers followed a manual with detailed lesson plans and introduced a specific social-emotional skill using stories, puppets, and discussions. During the PATHS lesson and during a weekly scheduled extension session, teachers led role plays, games, or craft activities that allowed children to practice the target skill with support and feedback. Teachers also received coaching in generalized teaching practices designed to support positive social-emotional and self-regulatory skill devel- opment in the classroom throughout the day. PATHS was enriched by a synchronized interactive reading program designed to support
child language skills and narrative understanding (Wasik, Bond, & Hindman, 2006) and focused on social-emotional themes. Teach- ers held daily reading sessions, reading and reviewing two books per week. Teachers were provided with a manual and books for the reading program, along with props, novel vocabulary, and scripted questions they could use during discussions to encourage child comprehension and promote advanced thinking and language skills. Book themes were coordinated with the PATHS program. For example, during the week when the PATHS lesson focused on the feeling “mad,” teachers read the books I Was so Mad by Mercer Mayer and Nosy Nora by Rosemary Wells (for more detail, see https://sites.psu.edu/redi/program-materials). Focusing the in- teractive reading program on PATHS themes provided teachers with daily opportunities to model, discuss, and reinforce the tar- geted social-emotional and self-regulation skills and support the developing language skills that provide a foundation for emotional understanding, self-control, and social problem solving.
Prior evaluations of REDI’s impact revealed positive effects on child social-emotional and self-regulation skills (Bierman et al., 2008) that were sustained through fifth grade (Welsh, Bierman, Nix, & Heinrichs, 2020). This study explored the degree to which the intervention may have also buffered children with high ACEs exposure against heightened feelings of social-emotional distress and compromised school bonding in their early adolescent years.
The Current Study
The present study was designed to extend existing research in two ways by testing the hypotheses: (a) that early childhood ACEs will predict heightened emotional distress and diminished school bonding in early adolescence, and (b) that the REDI preschool intervention delivered in Head Start will buffer children against the negative effects of early ACEs, reducing or ameliorating negative effects on early adolescent social-emotional distress and school bonding. Study participants were recruited during the prekindergarten year in Head Start, when caregivers reported on their ACEs. Head Start centers were randomly assigned to receive intervention (the REDI curricular enrichments) or serve as a control group (usual practice Head Start). Participants were then followed longitudinally from prekindergarten through ninth grade, as they dispersed widely into multiple school districts. When they were in seventh and ninth grades, participants completed measures of social-emotional distress and school bonding. Multilevel latent profile analyses were used to identify profiles rep- resenting different levels of adolescent social-emotional distress and school bonding, and to examine predictive links associated with preschool ACEs and preschool intervention. It was hypothesized that, without early intervention, ACEs exposure would predict more neg- ative adolescent adjustment profiles, but that the REDI intervention would promote resilience and diminish the negative effects of early ACEs exposure on adolescent adjustment.
Method
Participants
REDI trial participants included 356 prekindergarten children (58% White, 17% Latinx, 25% Black; 54% girls; Mage � 4.49 years old at study enrollment) recruited from 44 classrooms in 24 Head Start programs in three Pennsylvania counties. All 4-year-olds in these
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
287PROMOTING RESILIENCE
classrooms were invited to participate in the study, and the parents of 86% of them agreed to do so. Families were low-income (median annual income of $15,000). About one third (31%) of the parents had less than a high school education, 60% graduated from high school or received a GED, 8% completed a technical degree, and 2% completed a college degree. Participating centers were stratified on rural versus urban location, length of program (e.g., half- or full-day), and student demographics (percent students of color), and then randomized to intervention or control conditions. Figure 1 describes participant flow through the study. Sample demographics and additional descriptive statistics broken down by intervention status at study entry are pre- sented in Table S1 in the online supplemental materials.
Sample attrition was generally low and averaged about 2% per wave of data collection due mostly to participant mobility, with a retention rate of about 80% in ninth grade providing a sample of 294 for the present adolescent analyses. Attrition was not related to family demographics or baseline measures of child academic or social-
emotional skills, although there was less attrition in the control group than the intervention group. Full information maximum likelihood methods were used in the analyses to handle missing data.
All study procedures followed the standards for the ethical conduct of research specified by the American Psychological Association and were approved by the Pennsylvania State University Institutional Review Board (Head Start REDI—Research-based, Developmentally Informed; PRAMS00028979). Parents and teachers provided in- formed consent and students provided assent for participation; partic- ipants were compensated financially for completing assessments.
Intervention
The REDI classroom program (Bierman et al., 2008) targeted SEL and language/emergent literacy skills. Teachers taught the 33 weekly lessons of the Preschool PATHS curriculum (Domitrovich et al., 2007), covering the topics of prosocial skills, emotional understand- ing, self-control, and social problem-solving. Lessons introduced skill concepts using stories, puppet shows, and role plays, and teachers reinforced skill practice during weekly hands-on extension activities and by using REDI teaching strategies (positive classroom manage- ment, emotion coaching, and problem-solving dialogue) in the class- room. To reinforce social-emotional skills and enrich support for language development, teachers led interactive reading lessons four days per week following the approach of Wasik and colleagues (2006). Books were selected to link with the PATHS lesson of the week and teachers were provided with suggested questions to help them engage children in active discussion of the story. REDI also included a set of sound games to boost children’s phonological awareness, and alphabet center activities to build print awareness. To support intervention implementation, teachers received detailed man- uals, four days of workshop training, and weekly coaching with a trained REDI consultant (see Bierman et al., 2008 for more details). Implementation fidelity was monitored by REDI consultants. On average, teachers completed most of the planned intervention activi- ties across the academic year (ranging from 84% of the alphabet center activities to 88% of Preschool PATHS lessons). Average consultant ratings of implementation quality ranged between 4.39 – 4.70, reflecting descriptive anchors between 4 (adequate) to 5 (strong).
Measures
Childhood ACEs. At study entry, when children were in preschool, parents reported on the following nine ACEs during a structured interview describing the child’s developmental history conducted by a REDI staff member: (a) excessive family mobility (3 or more family moves), (b) a separation that involved living apart from the parent, (c) witnessing violence, (d) any form of child abuse, (e) parent arrest, (f) parent special education, (g) parent grade retention, (h) parent depression (CES-D Question- naire) dichotomized at the clinical cutoff score for depression, and (i) frequent corporal punishment (swatting or spanking 5 times or more in the last week; � � .55). Each ACE was scored dichoto- mously as being present or absent for a child. Rates of exposure in this sample to each of these adverse experiences and the tetra- choric correlations among the dichotomized experiences are shown in Table 1 (see Table S2 in the online supplemental mate- rials for more details regarding the ACEs measure used in this study).
Potentially Eligible (n = 412)
Missing in 7th Grade (n = 19)
Moved/Unavailable (n = 14) Refused (n = 5)
Assigned to Head Start Usual in PreK (Control, n = 164)
Assigned to REDI in PreK
(Intervention, n = 192)
Agreed (n = 398) Ineligible (n = 21)
Randomized (n = 356)
Declined (n = 14)
Missing in 7th Grade (n = 43)
Moved/Unavailable (n = 27) Refused (n = 16)
Missing in 9th Grade (n = 19)
Moved/Unavailable (n = 17) Refused (n = 2)
Missing in 9th Grade (n = 43)
Moved/Unavailable (n = 33) Refused (n = 10)
Analyzed (n = 294)
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram for the Research-based, Developmen- tally Informed (REDI) intervention.
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
288 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
Prior research on ACEs indicates a cumulative effect of expo- sure to adversity (i.e., having more ACEs is associated with poorer outcomes; Herrenkohl & Herrenkohl, 2007). To create a cumula- tive index of ACEs in this study, the nine items listed above were submitted to an item response theory (IRT) model using the “ltm” package (Rizopoulos, 2006) in R (Version 3.4.3; R Core Team, 2017). Rather than simply summing the experiences, the use of IRT weights items on the basis of their extremity (e.g., the relative frequency at which children experienced each risk) and discern- ment (e.g., the degree to which each risk differentiates those with higher vs. lower overall risk scores). IRT statistics are shown in Table 2. In our sample, child abuse, parent special education, and frequent corporal punishment were the most extreme items (least prevalent) whereas parent depression and parent arrest were the least extreme (most prevalent). Parent arrest and child abuse were the items that best differentiated children with higher or lower overall ACE scores. After IRT scoring, this measure was dichot- omized to identify the children in the sample with the highest rates of ACEs (top third).
Adolescent outcomes. Youth participants completed the same set of self-report measures in seventh grade and ninth grade which reflected the two specific constructs of interest in this study: social-emotional distress and school bonding.
Social-emotional distress. Youth completed seven measures with subscales that indicated youth feelings of social-emotional distress. Youth completed the Strengths and Difficulties Question- naire (Goodman, 1997), which included the Emotional Symptoms subscale (5 items describing depressed and anxious feelings; “I am
often unhappy, depressed or tearful”; � � .71) and the Peer Problems subscale (5 items describing social difficulties; “Others pick on me or bully me”; � � .57). Youth also completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson, Clark, & Telle- gen, 1988). The Negative Affect subscale indicated the extent to which youth experienced a set of 15 negative emotions (“sad,” “guilty,” and “disgusted”; � � .90) rated with a 5-point scale. On the Relationships with Others subscale of the School Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ; Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group [CPPRG], 1997), children rated five items about their peer experiences during the past year (e.g., “I am having a hard time making friends at school this year”; � � .79) using a 5-point scale. On the six-item subscale assessing perceived social competence from the Perceived Competence Scale for Children (Harter, 1982), children rated their efficacy in making friends (e.g., “Some kids wish that more people their age liked them”; � � .75) using a 4-point scale. They also completed the short form of the Loneli- ness and Social Dissatisfaction Scale (Parker & Asher, 1993) with 3 items reflecting feelings of loneliness (� � .81) and the Fear of Negative Evaluation subscale from the Social Anxiety Scale for Children-Revised (La Greca & Stone, 1993), with three items assessing social worries (“I worry that other kids don’t like me,” � � .78). All items were scored such that a higher score indicated more social-emotional distress. Total subscale scores were standardized at each grade level and scores at both grade levels were used in multilevel latent profile analyses as indica- tors of youth social-emotional distress (repeated measures within subject; �Grade 7 � 0.65; �Grade 9 � 0.63).
School bonding. Youth completed three measures with sub- scales that indicated youth feelings of school bonding. Youth completed the People in My Life Questionnaire (Ridenour, Green- berg, & Cook, 2006), including the 4-item School Bonding sub- scale reflecting positive feelings about school climate (e.g., “I like my class this year”; � � .69) and the 7-item Affiliation with Teacher subscale, reflecting positive feelings about teachers at the school (e.g., “My teachers respect my feelings”; � � .87). Youth also completed the 4-item General Adjustment subscale of the SAQ (CPPRG, 1997), rating their general attitudes toward school (e.g., “My school is a place where people treat me well”; � � .83) using a 5-point scale. All items were scored so that a higher score indicated more positive attitudes toward school. Total subscale scores were standardized at each grade level and scores at both
Table 1 ACE Item Frequencies and Tetrachoric Correlations
ACE items % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Family mobility 43 2. Separation from parent 25 .30��
3. Violence exposure 30 .07 .24��
4. Child abuse 11 .26�� .35�� .34��
5. Parent arrest 46 .25�� .42�� .24�� .34��
6. Parent special ed 26 .07 �.01 .16�� .20�� .14��
7. Parent grade retention 39 .17�� .09 .25�� .22�� .27�� .40��
8. Parent depression 49 .04 .07 .24�� .02 .30�� .14�� .26��
9. Corporal punishment 14 .08 .11� .39�� .28�� .38�� .04 .28�� .27��
Note. The “%” column shows percentage of the sample endorsing the item. ACE � adverse childhood experience. � p � .05. �� p � .01.
Table 2 Item Response Theory Weighting Details
ACE item Item extremity Item discernment
Family mobility 0.55 0.58 Separation from parent 1.42 0.88 Violence exposure 1.05 0.95 Child abuse 2.12 1.25 Parent arrest 0.13 1.47 Parent special education 2.01 0.55 Parent grade retention 0.56 0.94 Parent depression 0.08 0.67 Corporal punishment 1.99 1.13
Note. ACE � adverse childhood experience.
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
289PROMOTING RESILIENCE
grade levels were used in multilevel latent profile analyses as indicators of school bonding (�Grade 7 � 0.57; �Grade 9 � 0.54). Tables S3 and S4 in the online supplemental materials provide descriptive statistics for these adolescent outcomes and additional demographic information characterizing the sample when children were in seventh and ninth grades.
Plan of Analysis
The first step in the analyses was to create person-oriented profiles that described sample variation in the two outcome do- mains (social-emotional distress and school bonding) across the adolescent years (seventh and ninth grades). We conducted mul- tilevel latent profile analyses (MLPAs) which allowed us to char- acterize individual profiles based on the multiple subscales reflect- ing adolescent adjustment (rather than simply creating composites across measures). We included the same measures collected in seventh and ninth grades in the profile analysis in order to provide a reliable characterization of individual differences across the adolescent period. This strategy improved precision of measure- ment and also increased power for moderation analyses relative to a model examining only one time period alone. MLPAs were computed using Mplus statistical software (Version 8.1; two-level mixture analysis, MLR estimator; Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2017). Separate analyses were conducted to characterize individual dif- ferences in the domain of social-emotional distress (seven mea- sures, each collected in seventh and ninth grades) and school bonding (3 measures, each collected in seventh and ninth grades). Models included repeated measures collected in seventh and ninth grades (Level 1 variables) nested within the child across time (Level 2). Our strategy for model building was informed by prior studies conducted by Henry and Muthén (2010) and Van Eck et al. (2017). Profile selection was based on several goodness-of-fit indices, including low Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) values and high entropy val- ues. We also considered profile distinctiveness and meaningful interpretations (Beets & Foley, 2010; Roesch, Villodas, & Villo- das, 2010).
As the second step in analyses, the early childhood ACEs score was added to each of the MLPAs as a predictor to assess the degree to which having high ACEs in early childhood predicted member- ship in adolescent profiles reflecting higher levels of social- emotional distress and lower levels of school bonding. Then, intervention status (REDI intervention vs. control group) was added to each of the MLPAs as a predictor to assess the degree to which the REDI intervention was associated with adolescent pro- files in each of the outcome domains for the entire sample (an intervention main effect). Finally, the ACEs score by REDI inter- vention status interaction term was added to each of the MLPAs to assess whether the REDI intervention moderated the impact of early ACEs on later adolescent adjustment profiles in either out- come domain (a moderated intervention effect). In these models, intervention was dichotomous (0 � control group, 1 � interven- tion group), and ACEs scores were dichotomous (0 � low ACEs exposure and 1 � high ACEs exposure). Thus, the interaction term allowed us to assess four orthogonal groups: control group, low ACEs; control group, high ACEs; intervention group, low ACEs; and intervention group, high ACEs. In this model, significant interaction terms indicated that the association between early
ACEs and later adolescent outcomes was different for children in the intervention and control groups. For all analyses, p values of less than .05 were used to indicate statistical significance.
These models tested two hypotheses. First, without intervention (e.g., in the control group), it was anticipated that children with high ACEs exposure would exhibit adolescent profiles reflecting greater social-emotional distress and less school bonding than children with low ACEs exposure. Second, among children with high ACEs exposure, it was anticipated that those who received intervention would exhibit more positive adolescent profiles than their counterparts in the control group. For interpretation of these analyses, relative risk (RR) refers to the probability of being in a more well-adjusted profile compared to the probability of being in a more poorly adjusted profile for each comparison; values above 1 indicate an increased probability while values below 1 indicate a decreased probability.
Results
Multilevel Latent Profile Modeling
Several latent profiles models were estimated to identify likely subgroups of social-emotional distress and school bonding in adolescence. Table 3 presents full model fitting criteria for two-, three-, four-, and five-profile solutions for social-emotional dis- tress and school bonding, respectively.
In the domain of social-emotional distress, the three-profile model was chosen as best-fitting because entropy declined sharply past the three-profile solution and BIC indicated a substantial increase in model fit, which did not continue past the three-profile solution. Three profiles most succinctly described the data and were distinct and interpretable (Figure 2). The “low distress” profile contained the most cases (n � 179; 61% of the sample) and had the lowest means on a majority of the distress indicators (i.e., youth in this profile endorsed fewer negative emotions and more social support than youth in the other profiles). The “high distress” profile contained the fewest cases (n � 31, 11%) and had the highest means on all of the distress indicators. The remainder of the sample fell into a “medium distress” profile (n � 84, 29%). Full descriptive statistics for the social-emotional distress profiles are provided in Table S5 in the online supplemental materials.
In the domain of school bonding, the three-profile model was also chosen as best-fitting because BIC reduced to its lowest point and entropy peaked at the three-profile solution. Three profiles most succinctly described the data and were distinct and interpre- table (Figure 3). The “strong school bond” profile (n � 109; 37% of the sample) had the highest means for all three indicators of a positive school bond (i.e., youth in this profile endorsed liking their classes more, feeling more respect from teachers, and expe- riencing more positive peer treatment than youth in the other profiles). The “average school bond” profile had the most cases (n � 161, 55%) and characterized the average level of adjustment in our sample. The “weak school bond” profile had the fewest cases (n � 24, 8%) and had the lowest means for all three indicators of school bond. Full descriptive statistics for the school bonding profiles are provided in Table S6 in the online supple- mental materials.
The profiles showed a moderate level of intercorrelation (r � .41), and 50% of the sample fell into a profile reflecting the same
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
290 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
adjustment level (e.g., low, medium, or high) in both domains of social-emotional distress and school bonding. This degree of over- lap is consistent with prior research that suggests that adjustment in the domains of social-emotional distress and school bonding may affect each other, but they are also distinct domains of functioning (e.g., Pate, Maras, Whitney, & Bradshaw, 2017).
Hypothesis-Testing Models
Social-emotional distress. Model results predicting the place- ment of adolescents in profiles of social-emotional distress are shown in Table 4. The first three rows illustrate associations between ACEs and adjustment profile placement in the control group. Consistent with the first hypothesis, without intervention, children with high ACEs were less likely than those with low ACEs to exhibit profiles of low distress than profiles of high distress (RR � 0.26, 95% CI [0.13, 0.51], p � .05) or medium distress (RR � 0.40, 95% CI [0.25, 0.64], p � .05). The next three rows in Table 4 illustrate the effect of intervention predicting
adjustment profile placement for children with high ACEs expo- sure. Confirming the second hypothesis, children with high ACEs in early childhood who subsequently received the REDI preschool intervention were significantly more likely to exhibit profiles of low distress relative to high distress (RR � 8.10, 95% CI [3.16, 20.80], p � .05), such that children in the REDI intervention were about eight times more likely to be placed in the low distress profile relative to the high distress profile (Figure 4). In contrast, intervention had no significant effect on the profiles of adolescent distress exhibited by children with low ACEs.
School bonding. Model results predicting adolescent profiles of school bonding are shown in Table 5. As shown in the first three rows, children from the control group with high ACEs were significantly less likely than those with low ACEs to exhibit profiles of average school bonding (RR � 0.13, 95% CI [0.06, 0.30], p � .05) or strong school bonding (RR � 0.08, 95% CI [0.03, 0.18], p � .05) than profiles of weak school bonding. Confirming the second hypothesis, children with high ACEs in
Table 3 Model Fit Statistics for Social-Emotional Distress and School Bonding Latent Profile Models
Number of Level 1 profiles df LL BIC AIC Entropy Smallest profile n (%)
Social-emotional distress latent profiles
2 22 �5,011.66 10,162.80 10,067.31 0.93 85 (29) 3 30 �4,822.68 9,835.57 9,705.36 0.90 31 (11) 4 38 �4,770.45 9,781.84 9,616.90 0.83 23 (8) 5 46 �4,716.11 9,723.88 9,524.22 0.84 25 (8)
School bonding latent profiles
2 10 �2,231.46 4,526.32 4,482.91 0.73 135 (45) 3 14 �2,171.15 4,431.07 4,370.31 0.80 24 (8) 4 18 �2,158.77 4,431.66 4,353.54 0.71 20 (7) 5 22 �2,156.82 4,453.12 4,357.64 0.73 3 (1)
Note. The three-profile solution was selected for both social-emotional distress and school bonding (as indicated by boldface font in the table). df � degrees of freedom; LL � Log likelihood; BIC � Bayesian information criterion; AIC � Akaike information criterion.
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Perceived Social
Competence
SAQ: Relationships with Others
Loneliness Fear of Negative
Evaluation
SDQ: Emotional Symptoms
SDQ: Peer Problems
PANAS-S: Negative
Affect
eroc S
dezidradnat S
egarev A
Social-Emotional Distress Indicators
Low Distress Medium Distress High Distress
Figure 2. Latent profiles for social-emotional distress. Youth demographic characteristics by profile were as follows: low distress (61% of the sample; 48% female; 28% Black, 16% Latinx, 56% White), medium distress (29% of the sample; 63% female; 19% Black, 14% Latinx, 67% White), high distress (11% of the sample; 74% female; 10% Black, 10% Latinx, 80% White).
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
291PROMOTING RESILIENCE
early childhood who subsequently received the REDI preschool intervention were significantly more likely to exhibit profiles of average school bonding relative to weak school bonding (RR � 11.62, 95% CI [3.79, 35.66], p � .05), such that children in the REDI intervention were about 12 times more likely to be placed in the average school bond profile relative to the weak school bond profile. Additionally, these children were significantly more likely to exhibit profiles of strong school bonding relative to weak school bonding (RR � 17.81, 95% CI [5.62, 56.49], p � .05), such that children in the REDI intervention were about 18 times more likely to be placed in the strong school bond profile relative to the weak school bond profile (Figure 5; see also Table S7 in the online supplemental materials for a tabular presentation of the data pre- sented in Figures 4 and 5). Intervention had no significant effect on the profiles of adolescent school bonding of children with low ACEs.
Discussion
This study explored the associations between ACEs exposure in early childhood and aspects of social-emotional functioning in adolescence and examined the moderating impact of a pre- school intervention on these associations. The central hypoth- eses were confirmed. High ACEs exposure in early childhood
was associated with increased risk of experiencing social- emotional distress and weak school bonding in early adoles- cence. These findings are consistent with prior research sug- gesting that high ACEs during early childhood are associated with poorer adjustment in the domains of social-emotional functioning (including poor mental health; Sheffler et al., 2020) and school bonding/engagement (Bethell et al., 2014). The findings also extend prior research by documenting predictive links in a longitudinal study, with ACEs exposure reported by parents when children were 4 years of age and adolescent distress and school bonding reported by adolescents at Grades 7 and 9 (12–15 years of age).
In addition, this study demonstrated that receiving the REDI intervention in preschool conveyed some protection for children with high levels of early childhood ACEs exposure, reducing the prevalence of high social-emotional distress and weak school bonding experienced in adolescence. REDI is a resilience-focused, school-based intervention delivered in the classroom by Head Start teachers; thus, it has the potential to reach many young, at-risk children at relatively low cost. REDI targeted the promotion of SEL and early language skills, with the goal of helping children develop the emotional understanding, self-regulation, and social problem-solving skills that could support more positive emotion
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Feelings about School Climate Affiliation with Teacher Attitude toward School
eroc S
dezidradnat S
egarev A
School Bonding Indicators
Strong School Bond Average School Bond Weak School Bond
Figure 3. Latent profiles for school bonding. Youth demographic characteristics by profile were as follows: strong bond (37% of the sample; 55% female; 21% Black, 13% Latinx, 66% White), average bond (55% of the sample; 53% female; 27% Black, 16% Latinx, 57% White), weak bond (8% of the sample; 63% female; 8% Black, 17% Latinx, 75% White).
Table 4 Relative Risk of Social-Emotional Distress Latent Profile Membership Among Children With High ACEs in the Intervention and Control Groups
Children with high ACEs (n � 92) Comparison Relative risk Lower bound Upper bound
Control group (n � 41) Medium vs. high distress 0.63 0.31 1.29 Low vs. high distress 0.26� 0.13 0.51 Low vs. medium distress 0.40� 0.25 0.64
Intervention group (n � 51) Medium vs. high distress 2.65 0.96 7.34 Low vs. high distress 8.10� 3.16 20.80 Low vs. medium distress 3.06 1.62 5.78
Note. ACEs � adverse childhood experiences. � p � .05.
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
292 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
coping and social relationships as they transitioned into elementary school.
Interpreting Intervention Effects
Researchers have speculated that early interventions that pro- mote emotional understanding, build self-regulation and coping skills, and strengthen social support systems may play a central role in enhancing the later psychosocial adjustment of children exposed to early ACEs (Blaustein & Kinniburgh, 2018). This hypothesis is supported by developmental research demonstrating that vulnerable children with more well-developed social- emotional competencies and self-regulation skills show enhanced mental health and school adjustment in adolescence and later life (Eisenberg, Spinrad, & Eggum, 2010; Jones, Greenberg, & Crow- ley, 2015). It is also consistent with research suggesting that ACEs exposure in early childhood undermines the development of the neural systems that regulate stress reactivity and emotion regula- tion (Blair & Raver, 2012), and disrupts the quality of early attachment processes that provide a foundation for later internal working models and perceptions of interpersonal connectedness and self-worth (Cyr et al., 2010; Steele et al., 2016). From a
conceptual standpoint, positioning interventions to support social- emotional development in the preschool years may be highly strategic because this is a time period when the foundational language and social– cognitive skills that underlie effective self- regulation and social functioning undergo rapid development; hence, preschool intervention might offset the negative develop- mental impact of ACEs (Blair & Raver, 2012). Consistent with developmental research, a prior longitudinal study of children who received the Chicago Parent-Child Center preschool intervention (CPC; Niles, Reynolds, & Roe-Sepowitz, 2008) documented im- proved adolescent social adjustment for the subgroup of children whose families were coded as high risk when they were preschool- ers (high poverty, low parent education, single parent status), but not in those coded as low risk. Although the CPC study did not measure ACEs directly, the findings of this quasi-experimental program evaluation are consistent with the hypothesis that strate- gically designed preschool interventions can have long-term ben- efits for the social-emotional well-being and school adjustment of young children growing up in high-risk contexts.
The REDI study findings make a unique and important contri- bution to this literature, as they represent the first randomized-
Control (n = 41) Intervention (n = 51)
41%
69%
41%
24%
18% 8%
Low Distress Medium Distress High Distress
Figure 4. Social-emotional distress latent profile distribution by treatment condition for the high adverse experiences group.
Table 5 Relative Risk of School Bonding Latent Profile Membership Among Children With High ACEs in the Intervention and Control Groups
Children with high ACEs (n � 92) Comparison Relative risk Lower bound Upper bound
Control group (n � 41) Average vs. weak bond 0.13� 0.06 0.30 Strong vs. weak bond 0.08� 0.03 0.18 Strong vs. average bond 0.58 0.35 0.97
Intervention group (n � 51) Average vs. weak bond 11.62� 3.79 35.66 Strong vs. weak bond 17.81� 5.62 56.49 Strong vs. average bond 1.53 0.79 2.97
Note. ACEs � adverse childhood experiences. � p � .05.
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
293PROMOTING RESILIENCE
controlled trial of a preschool enhancement intervention empha- sizing enriched SEL that has followed children into adolescence to evaluate their social-emotional functioning. Children in the control group attended usual practice Head Start, reducing risks that the results reflect general aspects of educational or family support offered in the Head Start system and increase confidence that the findings can be attributed causally to the REDI intervention. At the same time, the specific mechanisms by which the REDI program reduced the social-emotional distress and promoted the school bonding of adolescents exposed to high levels of early ACEs is unclear. REDI was a multicomponent intervention that included intervention activities designed to promote language and emergent literacy skills as well as social-emotional and self-regulation skills. Compared with other preschool SEL programs that have docu- mented short-term benefits for children (Bierman & Motamedi, 2015; McClelland et al., 2017), REDI provided a “double dose” of SEL programming by integrating a daily interactive reading pro- gram with the Preschool PATHS program, so that preschool teach- ers focused explicitly on supporting emotion talk, self-regulation strategies, and social problem-solving skills on a daily basis. The relative roles that enhanced emotion knowledge or language skills in preschool, or improved learning engagement and interpersonal relationships during the elementary school years (Welsh et al., 2020), played in supporting the adolescent outcomes documented here remain unknown. In addition, questions about the threshold of “dose” needed to support skill levels that confer longer-term resilience remain. Future research is needed to replicate the current findings as well as to illuminate the developmental pathways that may account for the long-term intervention benefits.
Additional follow-up research is also needed to determine whether the improved social-emotional functioning documented here in adolescence will reduce the risk that ACE-exposed youth face for future mental health maladjustment or risky behaviors including substance use, school dropout, or antisocial activities (Hessler & Katz, 2010; Maynard et al., 2017; Wang & Peck, 2013).
Conceptualizing and Assessing ACEs
This study utilized an expanded ACEs scale that incorporated indices of the early adversities often experienced by children in low-income families (Finkelhor, 2018) along with indices of abuse and violence exposure (see also Mersky, Janczewski, & Topitzes, 2017). ACEs were measured by parent report at preschool entry, likely providing a more accurate assessment than the retrospective accounts made by adults which are used in many studies (Hardt & Rutter, 2004). Additionally, our analytic strategy took into account the relative severity of different experiences by using the IRT weighting approach.
However, it is worth noting that researchers have not yet reached a consensus regarding the specific experiences that should be included in the valid measurement of ACEs or the optimal assessment strategy. Initial measures of ACES tended to include a smaller set of events focused on child maltreatment and household dysfunction (Felitti et al., 1998). Subsequent researchers suggested that additional adverse life events often affect children growing up in poverty (Cronholm et al., 2015), leading to an expansion of items in ACEs scales designed to accurately capture the totality of the early adversity experience (Finkelhor, 2018; Finkelhor, Shat- tuck, Turner, & Hamby, 2015). For instance, a recent meta- analysis (Hughes et al., 2017) found that 31 different ACEs items appeared across 37 reviewed studies, and only 15 items appeared in three or more studies. In addition, a recent study demonstrated good psychometric properties and factor structure for a measure including both original ACEs and additional items, including bul- lying and food insecurity (Mersky et al., 2017). Similarly, our measure, obtained by parent report when children were preschool- ers, included both widely accepted items such as child maltreat- ment and family instability (e.g., parent depression, parent– child separations, frequent moves), as well as several less common items that more closely represented the unique risk facing this low- income, Head Start sample (e.g., parent special education, parent grade retention, corporal punishment). Future research is needed to
Control (n = 41) Intervention (n = 51)
27% 35%
54%
59%
20% 6%
Strong School Bond Average School Bond Weak School Bond
Figure 5. School bonding latent profile distribution by treatment condition for the high adverse childhood experiences group.
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
294 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
further refine measures of ACEs in ways that both identify and capture all salient features of children’s life experiences and ex- clude those that are less predictive of important outcomes. In addition, future research is needed to determine the optimal source of information about ACEs.
Study Strengths and Limitations
Important strengths of this study included the relatively large sample size, long-term prospective longitudinal design, and randomized-control trial that allowed for unbiased estimates of intervention impact. In addition, there are several study limitations to this study that should be considered when interpreting the results.
Although intervention was randomly assigned, ACEs were not. Hence, causal interpretations of the links between early childhood ACEs and adolescent outcomes are purely speculative. Multiple factors associated with the presence of ACEs may contribute to later outcomes, and the impact of early ACEs may continue throughout development as children are often continuously ex- posed to adversity.
As noted above, our assessment of ACE exposure was based on parent report collected at study entry when children were 4 years old. On the one hand, this kind of prospective data collected during early childhood is likely to avoid the significant recall biases associated with retrospective self-reports collected in adulthood (Hardt & Rutter, 2004; Reuben et al., 2016). For example, as many as 40% of individuals inconsistently remember experiences when recalling them retrospectively over multiple time points (Colman et al., 2016), making the prospective parent report of ACEs a strength of the study. On the other hand, additional data sources would have bolstered the validity of these parent reports. For example, administrative data (e.g., school records, documented contact with social services or court systems, physicians’ notes) could counter potential tendencies for parent underreporting of certain data (e.g., past abuse or incarceration). Such records are difficult to obtain, and many studies that include administrative data have incomplete or limited records (Reuben et al., 2016). However, even the availability of additional reporters (other care- givers, teachers) would have provided an assessment of reporting accuracy and the potential for a more robust ACEs assessment.
The outcome measures included in this study were limited to self-reports. Prior research suggests that adolescent self-reports of internalizing symptomatology do not typically align well with parent (Rescorla et al., 2013) or teacher ratings (De Los Reyes, Alfano, & Beidel, 2010). Hence, self-report measures may be the most valid source of data regarding adolescent’s perceptions about their feelings of distress and school bonding. In this study, findings were based on self-report data collected at two time points during adolescence to increase the robustness of the assessments of social-emotional experiences. However, these findings may not reflect other indices of adolescent maladjustment that could be measured more accurately by parent or teacher report or school records, such as school attendance and performance or behavior problems. Future studies should examine a wider array of adoles- cent outcomes and include measures from other raters (i.e., teacher-report, administrative data) to understand the breadth of ACEs association and early intervention impact.
Finally, it should be noted that the present study sample was drawn from Head Start programs in three counties in Pennsylvania. The degree to which the current findings may generalize more broadly to youth from low-income families in demographically and culturally dissimilar contexts is unknown.
Conclusions and Implications for Practice
The study findings carry important implications for educational policy and practice. Given that ACEs are common in the lives of young children growing up in poverty, it is important that inter- ventions effective at mitigating their impacts be readily available in classroom settings, and that teachers receive the training and professional development required to implement them in a time- and cost-effective manner. Many of the interventions designed to reduce social-economic disparities in education focus on enriching cognitive programming in preschool; this study suggests that fo- cused and evidence-based efforts to support SEL in preschool may be especially important for children growing up in poverty in order to address the negative impact of ACEs on their future social- emotional well-being and school engagement. It further demon- strates that classroom teachers can effectively promote the resil- ience of children with high ACEs exposure when they are provided with an evidence-based SEL program and coached in teaching strategies that enhance child social-emotional and self-regulation skills. Specific implications for practice include consistently in- corporating support for the teaching strategies and skills taught in REDI into preschool practice, including an emphasis on building the social-emotional and foundational language skills that support self-regulation, adaptive school engagement, and positive interper- sonal relationships. Future studies are needed to replicate and expand these findings and to explore the scalability and sustain- ability of preschool-based interventions like REDI that may sup- port resilience and enhance the later school adjustment and social- emotion well-being of high-risk children.
In addition, ongoing research is needed to better understand the range of social, educational, and policy-based programming that can address the existing widespread disparities that affect the educational attainment, health, and overall well-being of children growing up in poverty.
Public health models suggest that addressing economic dispar- ities and incorporating trauma informed principles into policies and social systems affecting these at-risk children may be critical to fully instigate social change (e.g., Shaefer et al., 2018; Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2012). Documenting the kind of early educational programming that can promote adolescent adjustment for children at early risk is an important first step. A broad perspective and high-quality research are needed to further identify the strategies that can help create greater equity in educational, mental health, and health outcomes.
References
Aikins, J. W., Bierman, K. L., & Parker, J. G. (2005). Navigating the transition to junior high school: The influence of pre-transition friend- ship and self-system characteristics. Social Development, 14, 42– 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00290.x
Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J. D., Walker, J. D., Whitfield, C., Perry, B. D., . . . Giles, W. H. (2006). The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
295PROMOTING RESILIENCE
from neurobiology and epidemiology. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256, 174 –186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00406-005-0624-4
Beets, M. W., & Foley, J. T. (2010). Comparison of 3 different analytic approaches for determining risk-related active and sedentary behavioral patterns in adolescents. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 7, 381– 392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.3.381
Bellis, M. A., Hughes, K., Ford, K., Hardcastle, K. A., Sharp, C. A., Wood, S., . . . Davies, A. (2018). Adverse childhood experiences and sources of childhood resilience: A retrospective study of their combined relation- ships with child health and educational attendance. BMC Public Health, 18, 792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5699-8
Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014). Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school en- gagement and the mitigating role of resilience. Health Affairs, 33, 2106 –2115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914
Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., Greenberg, M. T., . . . Gill, S. (2008). Promoting academic and social- emotional school readiness: The head start REDI program. Child De- velopment, 79, 1802–1817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008 .01227.x
Bierman, K. L., & Motamedi, M. (2015). Social-emotional learning pro- grams for preschool children. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 223–250). New York, NY: Guil- ford Press.
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2012). Child development in the context of adversity: Experiential canalization of brain and behavior. American Psychologist, 67, 309 –318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027493
Blaustein, M. E., & Kinniburgh, K. M. (2018). Treating traumatic stress in children and adolescents: How to foster resilience through attachment, self-regulation, and competency (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Breslau, N., Koenen, K. C., Luo, Z., Agnew-Blais, J., Swanson, S., Houts, R. M., . . . Moffitt, T. E. (2014). Childhood maltreatment, juvenile disorders and adult post-traumatic stress disorder: A prospective inves- tigation. Psychological Medicine, 44, 1937–1945. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1017/S0033291713002651
Clements-Nolle, K., & Waddington, R. (2019). Adverse childhood expe- riences and psychological distress in juvenile offenders: The protective influence of resilience and youth assets. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64, 49 –55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.025
Colman, I., Kingsbury, M., Garad, Y., Zeng, Y., Naicker, K., Patten, S., . . . Thompson, A. H. (2016). Consistency in adult reporting of adverse childhood experiences. Psychological Medicine, 46, 543–549. http://dx .doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715002032
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (CPPRG). (1997). School adjustment. Retrieved from the Fast Track Project website: http://www .fasttrackproject.org
Cronholm, P. F., Forke, C. M., Wade, R., Bair-Merritt, M. H., Davis, M., Harkins-Schwarz, M., . . . Fein, J. A. (2015). Adverse childhood expe- riences: Expanding the concept of adversity. American Journal of Pre- ventive Medicine, 49, 354 –361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015 .02.001
Crouch, E., Probst, J. C., Radcliff, E., Bennett, K. J., & McKinney, S. H. (2019). Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among U.S. children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 92, 209 –218. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.04.010
Cyr, C., Euser, E. M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van Ijzen- doorn, M. H. (2010). Attachment security and disorganization in maltreating and high-risk families: A series of meta-analyses. Devel- opment and Psychopathology, 22, 87–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0954579409990289
De Los Reyes, A., Alfano, C. A., & Beidel, D. C. (2010). The relations among measurements of informant discrepancies within a multisite trial of treatments for childhood social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 395– 404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9373-6
Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children’s social and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the preschool “PATHS” curriculum. The Journal of Primary Preven- tion, 28, 67–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-007-0081-0
Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engage- ment, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1649 –1660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964- 011-9647-5
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children’s maladjustment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 495–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.clinpsy.121208.131208
Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 43– 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12013
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., . . . Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14, 245–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0749-3797(98)00017-8
Finkelhor, D. (2018). Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): Cautions and suggestions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 85, 174 – 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.016
Finkelhor, D., Shattuck, A., Turner, H., & Hamby, S. (2015). A revised inventory of adverse childhood experiences. Child Abuse & Neglect, 48, 13–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.011
Forster, M., Gower, A. L., Borowsky, I. W., & McMorris, B. J. (2017). Associations between adverse childhood experiences, student-teacher relationships, and non-medical use of prescription medications among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 68, 30 –34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.addbeh.2017.01.004
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581– 586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
Gunnar, M. R., Wewerka, S., Frenn, K., Long, J. D., & Griggs, C. (2009). Developmental changes in hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal activity over the transition to adolescence: Normative changes and associations with puberty. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 69 – 85. http://dx.doi .org/10.1017/S0954579409000054
Hair, N. L., Hanson, J. L., Wolfe, B. L., & Pollak, S. D. (2015). Associ- ation of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 169, 822– 829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1475
Hardt, J., & Rutter, M. (2004). Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 260 –273. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00218.x
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129640
Henry, K. L., & Muthén, B. (2010). Multilevel latent class analysis: An application of adolescent smoking typologies with individual and con- textual predictors. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 193–215. http://dx .doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659342
Herrenkohl, T. I., & Herrenkohl, R. C. (2007). Examining the overlap and prediction of multiple forms of child maltreatment, stressors, and socio- economic status: A longitudinal analysis of youth outcomes. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 553–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007- 9107-x
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
296 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
Hessler, D. M., & Katz, L. F. (2010). Brief report: Associations between emotional competence and adolescent risky behavior. Journal of Ado- lescence, 33, 241–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.04 .007
Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., . . . Dunne, M. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta- analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2, e356 – e366. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4
Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2283–2290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302630
Kingery, J. N., Erdley, C. A., & Marshall, K. C. (2011). Peer acceptance and friendship as predictors of early adolescents’ adjustment across the middle school transition. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57, 215–243. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2011.0012
La Greca, A., & Stone, W. L. (1993). Social Anxiety Scale for Children— Revised: Factor structure and concurrent validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ s15374424jccp2201_2
Lee, A., & Hankin, B. L. (2009). Insecure attachment, dysfunctional attitudes, and low self-esteem predicting prospective symptoms of de- pression and anxiety during adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 219 –231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 15374410802698396
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resil- ience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child De- velopment, 71, 543–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Masten, A. S. (2016). Resilience in developing systems: The promise of integrated approaches. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 297–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1147344
Maynard, B. R., Vaughn, M. G., Nelson, E. J., Salas-Wright, C. P., Heyne, D. A., & Kremer, K. P. (2017). Truancy in the United States: Examining temporal trends and correlates by race, age, and gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 188 –196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .childyouth.2017.08.008
McCarthy, G., & Maughan, B. (2010). Negative childhood experiences and adult love relationships: The role of internal working models of attach- ment. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 445– 461. http://dx.doi .org/10.1080/14616734.2010.501968
McClelland, M. M., Tominey, S. L., Schmitt, S. A., & Duncan, R. (2017). SEL interventions in early childhood. The Future of Children, 27, 33– 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0002
McElroy, S., & Hevey, D. (2014). Relationship between adverse early experiences, stressors, psychosocial resources and wellbeing. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38, 65–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07 .017
McEwen, C. A., & McEwen, B. S. (2017). Social structure, adversity, toxic stress, and intergenerational poverty: An early childhood model. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 445– 472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev- soc-060116-053252
Mersky, J. P., Janczewski, C. E., & Topitzes, J. (2017). Rethinking the measurement of adversity. Child Maltreatment, 22, 58 – 68. http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/1077559516679513
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998 –2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
Niles, M. D., Reynolds, A. J., & Roe-Sepowitz, D. (2008). Early childhood intervention and early adolescent social and emotional competence: Second-generation evaluation evidence from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Educational Research, 50, 55–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 00131880801920395
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of
loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611– 621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611
Pate, C. M., Maras, M. A., Whitney, S. D., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2017). Exploring psychosocial mechanisms and interactions: Links between adolescent emotional distress, school connectedness, and educational achievement. School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal, 9, 28 – 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12310-016- 9202-3
Patten, S. B., Wilkes, T. C. R., Williams, J. V. A., Lavorato, D. H., El-Guebaly, N., Schopflocher, D., . . . Bulloch, A. G. M. (2015). Retrospective and prospectively assessed childhood adversity in associ- ation with major depression, alcohol consumption and painful condi- tions. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 24, 158 –165. http://dx .doi.org/10.1017/S2045796014000018
Petruccelli, K., Davis, J., & Berman, T. (2019). Adverse childhood expe- riences and associated health outcomes: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 97, 104127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.chiabu.2019.104127
Ramsook, K. A., Welsh, J. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2020). Not just what you say, but also how you say it: Preschoolers’ growth in vocabulary and communication skills differentially predict kindergarten academic achievement and self-regulation. Social Development, 29, 783– 800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sode.12425
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
Rescorla, L. A., Ginzburg, S., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., . . . Verhulst, F. C. (2013). Cross-informant agreement between parent-reported and adolescent self-reported prob- lems in 25 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychol- ogy, 42, 262–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.717870
Reuben, A., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Belsky, D. W., Harrington, H., Schroeder, F., . . . Danese, A. (2016). Lest we forget: Comparing retrospective and prospective assessments of adverse childhood experi- ences in the prediction of adult health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 1103–1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12621
Ridenour, T. A., Greenberg, M. T., & Cook, E. T. (2006). Structure and validity of people in my life: A self-report measure of attachment in late childhood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 1037–1053. http://dx .doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9070-5
Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05
Roesch, S. C., Villodas, M., & Villodas, F. (2010). Latent class/profile analysis in maltreatment research: A commentary on Nooner et al., Pears et al., and looking beyond. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 155–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.01.003
Schalinski, I., Teicher, M. H., Nischk, D., Hinderer, E., Müller, O., & Rockstroh, B. (2016). Type and timing of adverse childhood experiences differentially affect severity of PTSD, dissociative and depressive symp- toms in adult inpatients. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 295. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1186/s12888-016-1004-5
Shaefer, H. L., Collyer, S., Duncan, G., Edin, K., Garfinkel, I., Harris, D., . . . Yoshikawa, H. (2018). A universal child allowance: A plan to reduce poverty and income instability among children in the United States. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4, 22– 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2018.4.2.02
Sheffler, J. L., Stanley, I., & Sachs-Ericsson, N. (2020). ACEs and mental health outcomes. In G. J. Asmundson & T. O. Afifi (Eds.), Adverse childhood experiences (pp. 47– 69). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816065-7.00004-5
Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (2017). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. New York, NY: Rout- ledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315124841
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
297PROMOTING RESILIENCE
Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 1184 –1199. http://dx.doi.org/10 .2307/1128475
Steele, H., Bate, J., Steele, M., Dube, S. R., Danskin, K., Knafo, H., . . . Murphy, A. (2016). Adverse childhood experiences, poverty, and par- enting stress. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue cana- dienne des sciences du comportement, 48, 32–38. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/cbs0000034
Van Eck, K., Johnson, S. R., Bettencourt, A., & Johnson, S. L. (2017). How school climate relates to chronic absence: A multi-level latent profile analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 89 –102. http://dx .doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.10.001
Von Cheong, E., Sinnott, C., Dahly, D., & Kearney, P. M. (2017). Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and later-life depression: Perceived so- cial support as a potential protective factor. British Medical Journal Open, 7, e013228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013228
Wang, M. T., & Peck, S. C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1266 –1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030028
Wasik, B. A., Bond, M. A., & Hindman, A. (2006). The effects of a language and literacy intervention on Head Start children and teachers.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 63–74. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0022-0663.98.1.63
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and vali- dation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Weiland, C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2012). The effects of large-scale economic change and policies on children’s developmental contexts and develop- mental outcomes. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 342–350. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00222.x
Welsh, J. A., Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., & Heinrichs, B. N. (2020). Sustained effects of a school readiness intervention: 5th grade outcomes of the Head Start REDI program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 53, 151–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.03.009
Received October 1, 2019 Revision received June 27, 2020
Accepted July 12, 2020 �
E-Mail Notification of Your Latest Issue Online!
Would you like to know when the next issue of your favorite APA journal will be available online? This service is now available to you. Sign up at https://my.apa.org/portal/alerts/ and you will be notified by e-mail when issues of interest to you become available!
T hi
s do
cu m
en t
is co
py ri
gh te
d by
th e
A m
er ic
an P
sy ch
ol og
ic al
A ss
oc ia
ti on
or on
e of
it s
al li
ed pu
bl is
he rs
. T
hi s
ar ti
cl e
is in
te nd
ed so
le ly
fo r
th e
pe rs
on al
us e
of th
e in
di vi
du al
us er
an d
is no
t to
be di
ss em
in at
ed br
oa dl
y.
298 SANDERS, WELSH, BIERMAN, AND HEINRICHS
- Promoting Resilience: A Preschool Intervention Enhances the Adolescent Adjustment of Children Ex ...
- Family Adversity and Youth Development
- Transition to Adolescence
- Promoting Resilience With Preschool Intervention
- The Current Study
- Method
- Participants
- Intervention
- Measures
- Childhood ACEs
- Adolescent outcomes
- Social-emotional distress
- School bonding
- Plan of Analysis
- Results
- Multilevel Latent Profile Modeling
- Hypothesis-Testing Models
- Social-emotional distress
- School bonding
- Discussion
- Interpreting Intervention Effects
- Conceptualizing and Assessing ACEs
- Study Strengths and Limitations
- Conclusions and Implications for Practice
- References