Emergency Management Plan
Key Assessment Rubric: Emergency Management Plan Report Student Name:
|
Standard |
Concept |
Unacceptable |
Acceptable |
Target |
Scores |
|
CACREP: II.G.1h; SC A3; A7
|
Interview with School Personnel |
Student interviewed a school personnel on the school’s crisis management plan included a brief one page report with little details on the operation of the school emergency management plan.
0-3 points |
Student interviewed a school personnel on the school’s crisis management plan included a one page report that somewhat details the operation of the school emergency management plan and roles and responsibilities of the school counselor during crises, disasters, and other trauma-causing events.
3.5-4 points |
Student interviewed a school counselor on the school’s crisis management plan included a detailed one page report that details the operation of the school emergency management plan and roles and responsibilities of the school counselor during crises, disasters, and other trauma-causing events.
4.5-5 points |
/5 |
|
CACREP: II.G.3c; SC C6; D4 |
Impact of Crisis |
Did not address or inadequately addressed crisis, disasters, and other trauma causing events
0-6.5 points |
Adequate identification and explanation of crisis, disasters, and other trauma causing events for the specific age group
7-8.5 points |
Detailed explanation of the effects and impact of crisis on students, educators, and schools.
9-10 points |
/10 |
|
CACREP: II.G.3c; 5c; 5d; SC C1; C3; D4 GACE: II.I.1J |
Crisis Intervention Skills |
Limited to no discussion of the skills needed for crisis intervention.
0-6.5 points |
Adequate explanation of the skills needed for crisis intervention.
7-8.5 points |
Detailed explanation of the skills needed for crisis intervention.
9-10 points |
/10 |
|
CACREP: II.G.1b; 1c; SC A3; A7 ASU CF: 1c
|
Inter- disciplinary Team Role |
Little or no evidence of interagency/inter-organization strategies for collaboration and communication.
0-6.5 points |
Specific information about interagency/inter-organization strategies for collaboration and communication.
7-8.5 points |
Detailed information about the counselors’ roles and responsibilities as members of an interagency/inter-organization emergency management response team, including strategies for collaboration and communication.
9-10 points |
/10 |
|
CACREP: II.G.1b; 1c; SC M7
GACE: I.I.1F |
Strategies for Collaboration using an Collaboration Model |
Limited to no discussion and application of a collaboration model and strategies for collaboration of appropriate personnel.
0-6.5 points |
Adequate discussion and application of collaboration model for crisis/disaster preparedness and response information about strategies for collaboration and identifies the appropriate interagency/inter-organization personnel.
7-8.5 points |
Detailed discussion and application of a collaboration model for crisis/disaster preparedness and response and Detailed information about strategies for collaboration and identifies the appropriate interagency/inter-organization personnel.
9-10 points |
/10 |
|
|
APA Formatting |
The paper is not APA formatted and has less than 3 references
0-3 points |
The paper contains most elements APA with 3 references beyond the textbook
3.5-4 points |
The paper contains all elements of APA with 5 references beyond the textbook
4.5-5 points |
/5 |
|
|
|
0-69% 0-34 points |
70%-89% 35-44 points |
90%-100% 45-50 points |
/50 |