Homework
• Type of Intellectual Property
• Trade Secrets vs Patents
• Real Markets vs Financial Markets
• IP Link to Wealth Creation
• IP Valuation
CHAPTER 6: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS AN ASSET FOR WEALTH CREATION
Initial Foundation
1. Initial Owners Equity
2. Set stock par value
3. Set ownership %
4. Owners’ initial wealth
establishes
Intellectual
Property Creation
5. IP Patent Application
6. Valuation of Int Assets
7. Asses Competition
8. Establish market
appeal.
New Wealth
Creation
9. Financial vs. real
market point spread
10. Market Validation
11. New stock market
price
12. Change in ownership
% and wealth
WEALTH CREATION
Intellectual Property:
• Portfolio strategy
• Litigation process and cost
• How it affects a corporation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF IP
The IP attorney is an
important a member
of the team as the
accountant or the
research scientist.
Delivering Revenue
Building Markets
Ensuring Design Freedom
Managing Competition
Protecting your product with inventions
Driving
Strategy
IP IS A STRATEGIC ASSET THAT MUST BE MANAGED
Factor Physical Intellectual
Multi-use Use by one firm precludes
simultaneous use by
another
Use by one firm does not
preclude simultaneous use
by another
Depreciation Depreciates Does not wear out but may
become obsolete
Protection Can enforce and protect
ownership
Difficult and expensive to
enforce and protect
ownership
PHYSICAL VS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
• Patent requests queue currently around 650,000
• 4 year wait time for a first action
Category Purpose
Patent Protect the idea
Copyright Protect the unique expression of the idea
Trademark Protect the reputation of a product
Trade Secret Protect the sharing of an idea
• Intellectual Property is often viewed as synonymous with patents
• We should be using a broader definition for intellectual creative efforts:
IP CATEGORIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ax7QHQTbKQE
• Granted for new and useful processes, machines, compositions, manufacturing
• 3 general types:
• Utility: Operation of a machine
• Design: New decorative appearance
• Plant: Category of new plants
• Patents must fulfill the following requirements:
• Must be something new
• Must be useful
• New results
• Allows for replication
PATENTS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9JPeyWtuyk
• Don’t usually go to Federal court
• Is often a “contract law” question and not a legal question
• Employees might sign employment agreements
• Right to sue if the agreement is breached
• Dominated by “norms”
• Enjoy reciprocal behavior
• Reverse engineering is OK
TRADE SECRETS
• Protects original works like music, dance, books and software
• Its use must be referenced if reused
• Length of protection:
• Life of the author + 50 years
• 100 years from creation for work performed for a fee
• Enforced in a civil court
COPYRIGHTS
• Protect the consumer from confusion about the source of the goods
• Origins with the laws of fraud and deceit
• Protects the producers giving them an incentive to invest in differentiating
their products and brands from the competitors
• Note the protection of the “brand” … may be more important in the
future than patents!
• Can be lost: e.g. aspirin
TRADEMARKS
• Economists see IP as “inexhaustible”
• So the government has the intrinsic responsibility to pay
for things such as defense, public education, research
• Business see them as “scalable. Scalability is cumulative by
building IP on top of IP
• Private property rights tended to take priority over
government subsidy in IP
WHY IS IP SO ATTRACTIVE?
➢ A successful IP portfolio is tightly integrated with the company’s
business plan and product development plans
➢ A strong IP portfolio can help to shut out competition and secure a
strong place for your product in the market
➢ Strong IP portfolio can increase the value of company to investors
➢ Rarely is a single patent or a single type of protection sufficient
➢ The IP portfolio should evolve with the product line
➢ You may invent something new along the way and forget to patent.
IP IS A DYNAMIC STRATEGIC ASSET
To maintain an
approved monopoly in
the market
5. Bargaining power of complementors 6. Bargaining Power
of suppliers
2. Threat of entry by new competitors
3. Threat of Substitute Products
4. Bargaining Power of customers
1. Firm
Rivalry
PATENT PORTFOLIO VALUE FLUCTUATES
➢ Avoid the desire to patent everything in R&D
➢ Focus is the key – seek patent protection on the company’s core
technology and the functions related to that technology
➢ Core technology is key to the company’s business plan / non-
core technology is ancillary to the business plan
➢ Identify:
✓ What aspects of the technology provide the greatest
advantage over the competition?
✓ What advantage will provide the best value over time?.
MAINTAIN A BALANCED PORTFOLIO
ECV R&D
Expense
Expense
to
Commercialize
Trash
(abandon the patent)
Trash
Yes
No
Yes
No
NPV Net
Present
Value
Expected
Commercial
Value
Why did you invest in a technology for which
you will subsequently abandon the patent?
PATENT PORTFOLIO RISK ANALYSIS
> 4 x GDP
2-4 x GDP
< 2 x GDP
Current
Plans
Future
Plans
Not in
Plans
Business
Unit
Growth
Corporate Use
Core
Patents
50%
Non-Core
25%
License
Abandon
Non-Core
25%
KNOW WHAT TO MAINTAIN
1. You have a clever idea
2. Patent it to open a market
3. Collect revenue
IF THE PORTFOLIO IS VALUABLE, PEOPLE CARE
➢ Valuation Process
•Everyone has a favorite
• Seller vs buyer perspective differ widely
• Eventually have to get a third-party
➢ Typically down-select to three for the pro forma
• Explain why specific techniques were picked
➢ What are you willing to spend to protect a
downside of $4.5M in revenue?
IP VALUATION
Factor Physical Intellectual
Categorization Easy Difficult
Context Independent Dependent
Focus Specific Details Specific Concepts
Methodology Objective Subjective
➢ Valuation Process is similar to tangible assets
➢ Some market comparable might be hard to find
➢ Develop fair market approach with upper and lower bounds
IP VALUATION FACTORS
1. Market based: identification of similar intellectual property sold
under similar conditions. Requires the existence of an active
market
2. Cost based: estimate the cost to reproduce or pay to purchase
using historical or reproduction costs
3. Income based: focus on the income producing capacity of the
Intellectual property. Determine the Present Value to be received
over the life of the asset
IRS VALUATION METHODS
➢ Interest Rate: use company’s MARR
➢ Period: determine an estimate of the expected timeframe
➢ Annual benefit: estimate of enhanced revenue
➢ Expense: estimate for development/maintenance of the IP
0 3 4 521
x %
NPV
A=Net Income
VALUATION INCOME
➢ If we change N to 20: PV= $830,076
PV = 97,500 P/A,12%,5 = 97500 3.605 = $351,487
0 3 4 521
x %
NPV
A=Net Income
➢ Project Example:
o Interest= 12%
o N= 5 years
o Annual Benefit: 100,000
o Annual Expense: 2,500
VALUATION INCOME EXAMPLE
PV = −1,000,000 + 1,000,000 P/A,8%,10
= − 1000000 + 1000000 6.710 = $5,170,000
Acme Engineering has developed a new automated process to increase the production of
integrated circuits. They expect the new technology will support annual sales of $2.2M
which is an increase from the current $1M. The initial development was $1M and the
increased annual support is $200k. The current interest rate is 8%. What is the present
worth of this new IP if the expected life should be at least 10 years
VALUATION EXERCISE
Why is litigation so expensive?
Threatened with infringement …
• Obtain a legal opinion on
whether the patent is infringed,
invalid, and/or unenforceable
• File a declaratory judgment suit
that the patent is invalid and/or
not infringed
Lawsuits arise when:
• Discussions for a license fail
• Patent holder wants exclusivity
EVENTUALLY, COMPETITION MEANS INFRINGEMENT
1. IP is often synonymous with “patent”
• But, “trade secrets” can offer protection, too
2. Strategies can be “defensive”
• Keeping others out of your space
• Continuation claims are key (new claims on old patent)
3. Strategies can be “offensive”
• Anticipate and block competitor activity
• Frequently the basis for licensing deals
4. Understand your business risk threshold
• Lawsuit contingency and estimated liability (reserves)
LITIGATION IS INEVITABLE
Patent prosecution
• You are working with an attorney to protect the
inventions of company by creating intellectual property.
• The intention is to prevent others from using your IP
without paying fees.
Patent litigation
• The attorney works with the patent to stop others from
using your patent (an asset).
• Leverages the asset to obtain royalties or to prevent
activity.
LITIGATION: A DEFINITION
A situation reasonably suggests infringement occurring
Complaint: Plaintiff sends a letter:
• Request royalty
• Possibly “cease and desist” (stop and refrain from) letter by
lawyer
If no satisfaction …
• Formally file a complaint
Federal Rules require a patent holder to have a reasonable
belief that the patent is infringed before suit is brought
• About 20 days to respond
TYPICAL LITIGATION CASE
Claim there is no infringement
The patent is invalid
• Obvious to one skilled in the arts
• Anticipation: used by others prior to patent date (prior art)
• Statutory: Was “on sale” a year before the patent was filed
• Enablement: Patent does not describe the invention well enough
• Best mode: The inventor had a “best way” to implement but did
carry out or advise the PTO during prosecution
•Indefinite: Terms for the claims are not definite
The patent is unenforceable
• Patent office was materially misled during the patent prosecution
• “Laches” delay in bringing lawsuit; other legal terms
Antitrust
Unfair competition
Reexamination
SEVERAL DEFENSE MECHANISMS
Pre-litigation
Investigation
Complaint
Answer
Claim Construction
(Markman) Hearing
Discovery
depositions … expert witness
Trial Pre-Trial
Motions Appeal
Appeals Court
Judgment
Trial Court
Judgment
PATENT LITIGATION BASIC PROCESS
Some start at the
state level U.S Supreme Court
U.S Court of Appeals
U.S District Court
State Supreme Court
State Court of Appeals
State Trial Court
• Federal question
• Diversity jurisdiction
• US is a party
• No minimum monetary requirement
Jury Trial Judge panel
• Affirm
• Reverse
• Vacate
• Remand
PATENTS ARE A US FEDERAL ISSUE
WHERE TO LITIGATE?
Suing for infringement puts your IP “in play”
• Patents can be judged invalid, unenforceable or not
infringed
• Antitrust or unfair competition claims can be raised by
defendants or others
• Be confident of a good-faith basis to the suit
Success rates
• Plaintiff loses about 75% against an infringer
Typical costs
• About $3 - $10 million, with, say another $2 million for an appeal
Sure, many are solved for less.
• Takes 2 -3 years
LITIGATION COSTS
Objective Goals
• Market exclusivity through an injunction
• Income …
Compensation for losses
(Lost Profits, Reasonable Royalty)
Punitive Damages
(Increased Damages and/or Attorneys’ Fees)
Subjective Goals
• Promote and Protect Licensing Programs
• Establish a Reputation for Protecting Your IP
LITIGATION GOALS
A case
running over
6 years
LITIGATION DATA BASE
LITIGATION ACTIVITY
1. Long-Term Debt
• A loan through a bank
2. Bonds
• Issued by the firm and sold in the market
3. Deferred Tax Liabilities
• Arise from differences in Tax and Financial Statements
4. Deferred Pension and Benefits
• Can be significant and subject to regulations
5. Lawsuit contingency
• Estimated liability (reserve)
ACCOUNTING FOR LITIGATION UNCERTAINTY
• You and me are going to be partners
• It will cost you $1000
• Let’s Incorporate! • Application fee $175 (Form OH-532)
• Issue 10,000 stock (fee is $500)
LET’S FORM A COMPANY
THE RESULT
You need to deliver on what you promised!
• This is Round 1
• Angel Investor • Stock price negotiated $500/share
• 1500 Shares
• $750,000
• Now what?
NEW INVESTOR
IP is central to investors recovering their investment in high-
technology products.
Know that ….
… you need a portfolio
… the portfolio requirements will change over time
… consider being on the “offense” as your business grows.
… that if you create value, others will “eagerly” follow
… bullet-proof claims are the key to avoiding problems.
SUMMARY
QUESTIONS?
- Structure Bookmarks
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure
- Figure