Evidence base practice

EBP by Anqi Zheng

Submission dat e : 13- Mar- 2019 12:38PM (UT C+1100) Submission ID: 109236554 6 File name : 2328228_Anqi_Z heng_EBP_2110903_1884 3357 81.do cx Word count : 3650 Charact e r count : 20395

1

2

3

Awk.

4

5

6

Awk.

FINAL GRADE

7/20 EBP GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

Erica,

Your assignme nt has be e n awarde d t he mark of 7 /20 , which t ranslat e s t o a Fail.

Your Evide nce - Base d Pract ice Asse ssme nt has be e n marke d using t he crit e ria se t out in t he course out line . Ple ase re ad and t ake not e of t he spe cif ic comme nt s include d wit hin t he body of your work, and t he f ollowing, more ge ne ral, comme nt s base d on t he assignme nt crit e ria.

An unde rst anding of t he t ask and it s re lat ionship t o t he t he ory, re se arch and pract ice of classroom manage me nt , was not we ll de monst rat e d.

T he art icle s you chose f or t he asse ssme nt we re not appropriat e , as t he y we re not art icle s de scribing re se arch st udie s t hat support t he use of t he e vide nce base d pract ice s on t he list provide d. T his made it ne arly impossible f or you t o addre ss t he prompt s in t he mat rix corre ct ly and e f f e ct ive ly.

T he submission was above t he 3,0 0 0 word le ngt h re quire me nt by 10 %.

Your use of ke y t e rms and conce pt s lacke d clarit y and accuracy at t ime s.

Your unde rst anding of ke y classroom manage me nt principle s and issue s was not cle arly e vide nt .

You subst ant iat e d t he use of e vide nce base d pract ice s in part t wo of t he asse ssme nt , and but f aile d t o provide an e xplanat ion of how t e ache rs could de t e rmine if a pract ice had an e vide nce base t o support it s use . You also re - summarise d some of t he mat e rial f rom part 1, which was inappropriat e .

Your re sponse was support e d by a range of pe e r re vie we d lit e rat ure .

Your assignme nt was ade quat e ly st ruct ure d, but t he product lacke d bot h clarit y and cohe re nce . T his was cause d by e rrors in se nt e nce st ruct ure , vocabulary, spe lling and punct uat ion.

As pe r t he S cho o l o f Educat io n asse ssm e nt po licy, yo u m ay re subm it t his asse ssm e nt f o r a m ark no gre at e r t han a 10 /20 . Yo u will subm it t his re subm issio n t o t he re subm issio n bo x o n t he co urse ’s Mo o dle sit e . Yo u have t wo we e ks t o subm it , so yo u m ay want t o m ake an appo int m e nt t o se e m e t o go o ve r yo ur asse ssm e nt .

QM

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Comment 1

T his article describes mo re than o ne EBP, so yo ur answers to the pro mpts f o r this EBP lack clarity and co herence.

PAGE 3

Comment 2

T his is no t an appro priate article f o r this assessment as it do es no t describe a study used to pro vide evidence to suppo rt the use o f the EBP

PAGE 4

Comment 3

to allo w the student to do what?

PAGE 5

Awk. Awkward: T he expressio n o r co nstructio n is cumberso me o r dif f icult to read. Co nsider rewriting.

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

Comment 4

QM

Interventio n in Scho o l and Clinic is a practitio ner - f o cused jo urnal. It seeks to span the research to practice gap by pro viding implementatio n advice to teachers. It do es no t disseminate research studies, so is no t appro priate f o r this assessment.

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

Comment 5

Again, this article is no t appro priate f o r this assessment.

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

Comment 6

T his who le paragraph do esn't address the pro mpt.

PAGE 14

Awk. Awkward: T he expressio n o r co nstructio n is cumberso me o r dif f icult to read. Co nsider rewriting.

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17