Evidence-Based Practice

Tinacherry100$
EB.ASSIGN.1.docx

PRACTICUM OBJECTIVES

This course includes a 160-hour practicum as part of the clinical hours that are required for the DNP credential. The Practicum Experience enables you to explore key issues related to your specialty practice and to refine your leadership skills as you work with others at your practicum site. To guide you through your practicum hours, you will develop practicum objectives.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).  Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 4, “The Practice Question Phase” (pp. 73–98)

· Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021).  Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 1, “Evaluation and Advanced Nursing Practice: The Mandate for Evaluation” (pp. 3–36)

· Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017).  Action plan for translating research into practice: Gap analysis and tests of change: Facilitator guide Links to an external site. . https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/tools/mvp/modules/cusp/action-plan-trip-fac-guide.html

· Chia, R., Pandey, A., & Vongpatanasin, W. (2020).  Resistant hypertension—defining the scope of the problemLinks to an external site. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases63(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2019.12.006

· Gallagher Ford, L., & Melnyk, B. M. (2019).  The underappreciated and misunderstood PICOT question: A critical step in the EBP processLinks to an external site. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(6), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12408

· Shirey, M. R. (2011).  Addressing strategy execution challenges to lead sustainable changeLinks to an external site. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration41(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e318200288a

· Stannard, D. (2021).  Problem identification: The first step in evidence‐based practiceLinks to an external site. AORN Journal113(4), 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13359

· Walden University Oasis: Writing Center. (n.d.).  Citations: OverviewLinks to an external site. . https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citations 

· Walden University Oasis: Writing Center. (n.d.).  Common assignments: Discussion post Links to an external site. . https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/discussionpost 

TO PREPARE

· Review the Practicum Journal Document.

· Begin to think about learning objectives that would guide your practicum hours, as well as the activities you will undertake to achieve those objectives. Refer to the DNP Essentials and your specialty competencies to inform your development of the learning objectives.

THE ASSIGNMENT: (1–2 PAGES)

· List your practicum objectives that you have identified. The number of practicum objectives will vary based on your practicum experience.

· Describe key activities associated with your practicum objectives. Be specific. 

You will have an opportunity to resubmit, after Faculty feedback, in Week 2.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at  https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site. ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Rubric

NURS_8502_Week1_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week1_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify practicum objectives to guide your practicum hours.

50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies practicum objectives. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate objectives that fully support the practicum experience.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies practicum objectives. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate objectives that support the practicum experience.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies practicum objectives. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant objectives that may support the practicum experience.

34 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies practicum objectives, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague objectives that do not support the practicum experience, or it is missing.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize activities you will undertake to achieve your practicum objectives.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the activities associated with the objectives. ... The response accurately and clearly evaluates each of the variables presented.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response accurately summarizes the activities associated with the objectives. ... The response accurately evaluates each of the variables presented.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the activities associated with the objectives. ... The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the activities associated with the objectives, or it is missing. ... The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, or it is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next