MSB

H-8
Distinguishingfeaturesofservices1.pptx

Distinguishing features of services

Marketing Services 2

Four distinguishing features

Intangibility

Inseparability

Variability (heterogeneity)

Perishability

These four features have been identified by a variety of authors, but Zeithaml, Parasuraman, and Berry (1985) provide an excellent review of the features and a summary of their implications (you can cite these authors, if you need to, when discussing the four features)

Intangibility

Abstract experiences, activities, and processes, so can’t be seen or touched

Probably the most fundamental characteristic

Implications of intangibility

Difficult to evaluate which increases buyer risk

Difficult to promote/communicate

Impossible to build up an inventory

Issues for marketing:

Brand image

Physical cues

Price as a quality proxy

Guarantees and endorsements

Free trials

WOM

Implications of intangibility

The ease or difficulty of evaluating a service depends on its attributes:

Search attributes (attributes that can be evaluated prior to purchase)

Experience attributes (attributes that can only be evaluated during/after consumption)

Credence attributes (attributes that can’t be evaluated easily even after purchase)

Intangibility

(Zeithaml, 1981)

Restaurant Meals

Vacation

Haircut

Entertainment

High In Experience

Attributes

Computer Repair

Education

Legal Services

Complex Surgery

High In Credence

Attributes

Inseparability

Customer consumption often simultaneous with service production/delivery

Customers interact with service provider

Can include customer co-production

Implications of inseparability

Service providers require different skill set

Co-production can influence service outcome

Other customers can be present

Difficulty selling to geographically widespread market

Difficult to correct defective service

Issues for marketing:

Employee and customer management

Multi-site locations

Opportunity for customization

Variability (Heterogeneity)

No two service provisions are ever identical

Affected by personnel delivering service, time of day, other customers present, etc.

Individual customer perceptions of service delivery will vary

Implications of variability

Consistently perfect quality difficult to achieve

Service delivered to the customer may not match what was promoted or planned

Implications for brand image

Greater risk for customer

Issues for marketing:

Training and/or technology to reduce variability

Standardise wherever possible

But remember,

customers of more ‘hedonic’ services expect a customized approach (Ding and Keh, 2015)

Perishability

Cannot be stored or saved, and sold later

Little or no inventory

Implications of perishability

Lost revenue (excess capacity)

Lost customers (excess demand)

Issues for marketing:

Managing congestion during peak demand, and unused capacity during low demand

A Fifth Characteristic?

Lack of ownership

Marketing transactions that do not involve a transfer of ownership (Lovelock and Gummesson, 2004)

The extended marketing mix

Booms and Bitner (1981) extended mix to 7 ‘Ps’. The importance of each will vary according to the particular service

Physical Evidence

Process

People

The extended marketing mix

People

All human actors who play a part in service delivery and influence a buyer’s perceptions

Physical Evidence

The environment in which the service is delivered and any other tangible elements

Process

The procedures, mechanisms, and flow of activities by which the service is delivered

References

Booms, B. and Bitner, M.J. (1981) Marketing strategies and organization structures for service firms. In Donnelly, J. and George, W. eds. (1981) Marketing of Services. Chicago: AMA, pp. 51-67.

Ding, Y. and Keh, H. (2015) A re-examination of service standardization versus customization from the consumer’s perspective. Journal of Services Marketing. 30 (1), 16-28.

Lovelock, C. and Gummesson, E. (2004) Whither services marketing: in search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research. 7 (1), pp. 20-41.

Zeithaml, V. (1981) How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services. In Donnelly, J. and George, W. eds. (1981) Marketing of Services. Chicago: AMA, pp. 186-190.

Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A., and Berry, L. (1985) Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing. 49 (2), 33-46.