critiq2

Good 2 pts

Fair 1.5 pts

Poor 1 pts

Bad

0 pts

Summary

Good

The article is clearly but succinctly summarized - only the key points of the article are touched upon. The article summary takes up no more than one third of the total assignment.

Fair

The article is clearly summarized, but some sub points are addressed along with main points.

Poor

The article summary is unclear or overly detailed. Often well over half of the assignment is taken up by the summary.

No Effort

Critique

Good

Strengths and weaknesses that are central to the article are addressed. The discussion of strengths and weaknesses take up the majority of the assignment.

Fair

Strengths and weaknesses that are peripheral to the article are addressed. The discussion of strengths and weaknesses take up the majority of the assignment

Poor

Strengths and weaknesses are addressed peripherally, weakly, or not at all. The discussion of strengths and weaknesses take up only a small part of the assignment

Mechanics

Good

There are no grammatical errors or typos.

Fair

There are few grammatical errors or typos

Poor

There are many grammatical errors and/or typos

Format

Good

APA/MLA and page length requirements are met

Fair

APA/MLA and page length requirements are met

Poor

APA/MLA and page length requirements are not met.