CPS Avtivity
Fall 2019 DHM 2003 Problem Solving Strategies
LC# Rubric for CPS #1
|
Criteria |
Description |
Score |
|
Title page & Table of contents (2.5%) |
The title page and table of contents are appropriate. |
A = Exceptional (0.5) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35 D = Many concerns (0.3) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Problem Statement (5%) |
The problem statement is clearly stated. |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Literature Review (10%) |
Provided literature review while sharing 3-5 references. |
A = Exceptional (2.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4) D = Many concerns (1.2) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Methodology (10%) |
The methodology is explained clearly. Used two or more creative thinking tools (brainstorming and force-fitting as a minimum). |
A = Exceptional (2.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4) D = Many concerns (1.2) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Initial and Final Design (15%) |
Included sketches of both the initial and final design, and described them in detail. |
A = Exceptional (3.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (2.4) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (2.1) D = Many concerns (1.8) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Innovation (10%) |
Did push boundaries in terms of coming up with a unique design. |
A = Exceptional (2.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4) D = Many concerns (1.2) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Target Market (5%) |
Provided demographics for the target market and briefly discussed. |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Rationale for the design (5%) |
Provided a rationale as to why the design will be liked the target market. |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Assumptions (5%) |
Listed all the assumptions made (2-3 minimum). |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Lessons learned (5%) |
Shared lessons learned using 5-10 sentences. |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Summary (5%) |
Provided a summary of the assignment. |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Appendix (2.5%) |
Listed all the ideas generated in the Appendix, along with any initial sketches |
A = Exceptional (0.5) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35 D = Many concerns (0.3) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
References (5%) |
Listed all the references used in-text at the end. |
A = Exceptional (1.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.8) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.7) D = Many concerns (0.6) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Organization (2.5%) |
The report is organized well. |
A = Exceptional (0.5) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35 D = Many concerns (0.3) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
Written Communication (10%) |
The report is written clearly using appropriate tense and voice, and also with no grammatical errors. |
A = Exceptional (2.0) B = Solid, but could have been better (1.6) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (1.4) D = Many concerns (1.2) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |
|
APA format (2.5%) |
Used APA format in-text and at the end while citing the references. |
A = Exceptional (0.5) B = Solid, but could have been better (0.4) C = Lackluster or inconsistent (0.35 D = Many concerns (0.3) F = Does not meet expectations (0) |