Decision-Making in Management
Criteria Ratings Points
Among the Given Techniques Compare 2 Decision-Making Techniques
20 to >14 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly compared 2 decision-making techniques
14 to >8 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily compared 2 decision-making techniques
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently compared 2 decision-making techniques
0 pts
Not Present
Did not provide 2 decision-making technique or compare them.
20 pts
Presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.
10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not present a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.
10 pts
Apply the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.
20 to >14 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.
14 to >8 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not apply the technique.
20 pts
State what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making
5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not state what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.
5 pts
Decision-Making Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Abstract 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application.
5 pts
Introduction 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from your introduction section.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not present a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A thesis statement is missing from your introduction section.
5 pts
Conclusion 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
5 pts
Mechanics, Composition & Word Count
10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Mechanics, composition, and word count is thorough.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Mechanics, composition, and word count is satisfactory.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Mechanics, composition, and word count is insufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
There are many errors in mechanics, composition, and word count.
10 pts
Decision-Making Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
APA Formatting 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
APA formatting is thorough.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
APA formatting is satisfactory.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
APA formatting is insufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
APA formatting does not exist.
5 pts
References 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
References meet requirements in number and quality.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
References almost meet requirements in number and quality.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
References do not meet requirements in number and quality.
0 pts
Not Present
Missing references
5 pts
Citations 10 to >8 pts
Advanced
All statements are supported by citations.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Many statements are supported by citations.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Some statements are supported by citations.
0 pts
Not Present
Citations are rare, repetitious, or non-existent.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Decision-Making Grading Rubric