Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics (2011)
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
EXTENSIONS OF MEANING
Chapter 12
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Jane’s eyes nearly popped out of her head = she is surprised
(Literal and figurative use)
The reading of a word with the earliest recorded use.
The most frequently occurring reading of a word.
The default reading of a word.
The reading from which the most plausible path of change begins. P.240 (3 readings of the noun position)
The reading most closely related to basic human experience. (expire means to die)
ESSENCE OF LITERALNESS
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Word is entrenched and familiar part of a language
Speakers no longer feel that a figure of speech is involved at all; such readings of a word will be said to be naturalized
E.g. He is in love
E.g. It’s hard to put into words
NATURALIZED EXTENSIONS
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Readings which are well established
Presumably have entries in the mental lexicon
Are felt to be figures of speech
E.g. John is a couch potato \
E.g. She swallowed the story
ESTABLISHED EXTENSIONS
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Readings are ones for which there are no entries in the mental lexicon
They cannot be `looked up‘
Have to be generated and interpreted using strategies of meaning extension such as metaphor and metonymy
NOVEL EXTENSIONS
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Dictionary definition: "The use of a word or phrase to mean something different from the literal meaning" (Oxford Advance Learner's Dictionary)
Lakoff:
metaphor is all-pervasive in language
For most part effortlessly interpreted
Deserves constructive consideration
METAPHOR
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Metaphors are:
an essential component of human cognition
conceptual in nature
They are “a means whereby ever more abstract and intangible areas of experience can be conceptualized in terms of the familiar and concrete”
LAKOFF
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Metaphors involve
a source domain, usually concrete and familiar
a target domain, usually abstract or at least less well structured
a set of mapping relations, or correspondences
LAKOFF
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
The correspondences involved in metaphor are of two kinds:
Ontological-involving entities in the two domains (i)
Epistemic- involving relations of knowledge about the entities (ii) P.245
LAKOFF
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Conceptual elements, schemas, involving space, motion and force
Lakoff:
Basic semantic notions such as time, quantity, state, change, cause, and category membership are also metaphorically understood as extensions of image-schemas
Categories, quantity P.248, time (iii) P. 248, causation (28)
IMAGE-SCHEMAS
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Lack of context sensitivity
Alleged lack of structure in target domains
Fusion not accounted for
Emergent meaning
CRITICISMS OF LAKOFF
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Neither of the components requires an extended construal
Comparison process is overtly signaled
No need for anomaly as a trigger
Different conceptions remain distinct
Fusion is not characteristic of simile
SIMILIES is an explicit comparison between two different conceptions
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
X (be) like Y
John is like a lion.
X (V) like Y
Tree branches cracked like guns going off.
X (be) Adj. like Y
His skin was dry like parchment.
S ‘as if‘ S2
He acts as if he thinks he's the boss.
P.254 (12.4.1,2,3) P.255
SIMILIE FORMS
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Strategy for extending word-meanings
Responsible for a great proportion of the cases of so-called regular polysemy
Relies on a literal association between two components within a single domain
No restructuring involved
E.g. Room 44 wants a drink.
METONYMY
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
Historical processes of semantic change linked to synchronic processes of meaning extension.
Synchronic meaning extension forms an essential part of diachronic change
Meaning of a word may change along any of a range of semantic dimensions
E.g. the word “expire” P. 260
SEMANTIC CHANGE
‹#›
ENG350: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics