Help
CRCC CODE OF ETHICS
CRCC CODE OF ETHICS 19
Reflection
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
CRCC Code of Ethics
Introduction
The CRCC (Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification) details the required professionalism that rehabilitation counselors ought to utilize to guarantee effective provision of direct services. In this sense, the CRCC code of ethics attributes clients as persons with or affected disability aspects, medical conditions, or functional limitations. The CRCC code of ethics is specifically designed to provide the necessary guidance meant to guarantee better ethical practices by the rehabilitation counselors. Particularly, the existing objectives of the code entail: promotion of public welfare through specifying the expected ethical behaviors of the rehabilitation counselors. The code as such establishes the necessary principles guiding ethics that assist the various rehabilitation counselors in developing the best professional action needed to achieve the most appropriate rehabilitation purposes (Glosoff and Rocco, 2010). The CRCC Code also acts as the necessary basis for processing alleged violations by the certified rehabilitation counselors (Commission of Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, 2017).
Particularly, the process of rehabilitation and counseling is systematic and with proper implementation of the CRCC code, counselors are able to assist people with mental, physical, or even cognitive disabilities. Most counseling processes are subject to involve goal setting, communication, and beneficial patient change through self-advocacy, vocational, behavioral, psychological, and social interventions. As a counselor, it is important to adhere to the CRCC code of ethics and the counseling procedures because it enables the patient to achieve better personal and career goals (Glosoff and Rocco, 2010). Rehabilitation counselors need to demonstrate beliefs, knowledge, attitudes, and skills to ensure they provide competent counseling and rehabilitation services. Being a rehabilitation counselor, it is important to commit yourself towards facilitating the provision of services addressing economic, personal, and social independence amongst individuals/clients with disability issues. As such, it is important for rehabilitation counselors to embrace cultural approaches and also recognize diversity in ways that support dignity, worth, and the uniqueness of the various clients with disability.
A.3 Client Rights
As a rehabilitation counselor dealing with various clients with physical, psychological, and neurodevelopment disorders mandates the need to always provide professional disclosure. In this sense, there is need to ensure the implicit review of my clients through both oral and writing means. With a disclosure statement, the responsibilities and rights of both the counselor and the client will be well articulated. By this, I will present the disclosure through a manner that best suits the respective client needs. Particularly, the disclosure will be the onset of our professional relationship with the person and would be consisting of the following aspects: My qualifications, experience, and credentials as a rehabilitation counselor, the length and frequency of the services offered throughout the required counseling process, goals, techniques, purposes, or limitations of the counseling process (Glosoff and Matrone, 2010). It will also be critical to inform the client of the benefits and potential risks that could be brought forth with their participation in the counseling process.
My professional disclosure statement would also seek to assure the clients of confidentiality aspects and any existing limitations. In this sense, as a rehabilitation counselor, it is critical to retain the information provided by the client private. From a professional perspective, the disclosure will further detail payment arrangements, legal issues that might affect the services, and the contingencies that could inform continuation of the services beyond the specified period. As a rehabilitation counselor, I recognize the need to disclose the aforementioned aspects to ensure the creation of better professional relationship with the clients. Most of the clients with disability issues are often susceptible to high vulnerabilities and that is why I seek to provide the necessary professional disclosures (Commission of Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, 2017).
Notably, the other element under client rights relates to providing the client with informed consent. Through this notion, the clients will exercise their freedom of choice that is whether to facilitate their involvement in the counseling process or choose another counseling option. Being a rehabilitation counselor, I am obligated to respect the client rights to participate in the rehabilitation process or else, make the informed decision to refuse the services offered. (Glosoff and Rocco, 2010). The rehabilitation counselor needs to facilitate appropriate documentation of the disclosure statements and informed consent to ensure their conformity with the CRCC code of ethics.
My rehabilitation and counseling services need to also encompass an individualized communication approach to guarantee efficacy regarding the transfer of information in a cultural and developmental manner. When needed, a translator would be necessary to ensure proper communication. It is also necessary to support network involvement to ensure the clients receive support from their family and friends throughout the rehabilitation process. The consent of the clients is appropriate because as a counselor you need their permission to enlist the support of their close relatives, friends, and other individuals of their choosing like religious leaders (Glosoff and Matrone, 2010). When their lacking ability by the clients to give consent, such as with minors or persons unable to give voluntary consent, as a rehabilitation counselor, I would seek the acceptance by the client to be involved in decision making when appropriate.
A.4 Avoiding Harm & Imposing Values
The process of counseling and rehabilitation is subject to utilize strategies and procedures that guarantee compliance to the principle of beneficence. By this, the actions of any rehabilitation counselor ought to aspire towards ‘to do good to others’ and thus, ensure the promotion of the respective clients’ well-being. As such, being a rehabilitation counselor, the needs of my clients are always my priority because they are helpful in developing the necessary counseling mechanisms and treatments. Avoiding harm requires that I undertake succinct evaluation of the client conditions and always develop better information awareness concerning the most appropriate treatment procedure. (Cartwright and Fleming, 2010). Counselors and therapists are always required to undertake actions that will not harm their clients or research participants.
Particularly, to avoid harming the clients, there is need to avoid breaking confidentiality, not to violate the stipulate client-counselor boundaries like developing an affair, and always provide the most appropriate advice, which would not subject the client or any other individual to harm. Preventing the ethical dilemmas that often arise during the counseling and rehabilitation process calls for the counselor to have an implicit understanding of the constituents of their professional relationship, ensure privacy and confidentiality, respect autonomy, and always document their sessions (Glosoff and Rocco (2010). I also put up strategic processes and remedies to mitigate unavoidable or else, unanticipated harm.
As a rehabilitation counselor, it is of great significance to be aware and considerate of personal values. In this sense, counselors need to avoid imposing their own attitudes, values, behaviors and beliefs throughout the counseling process. Rehabilitation counselors should guarantee they exercise respect over diversity considering many of their clients do not share similar cultural, religious, and social backgrounds. In essence, to facilitate the provision of better counseling services and treatments, as a counselor I would seek the necessary training on areas that risk my imposition of personal values and beliefs upon the clients. Specifically, when my values and behaviors are subject to inconsistency in comparison to the client’s goals, they will be discriminatory in nature thus a hindrance to the counseling process (Cartwright and Fleming, 2010). In this sense, I always consider aligning my values to the client’s counseling expectations to ensure better progress and my implicit understanding of their disability issues.
With counseling, it is important for the counselors to have a better understanding of their personal attributes, values, and behaviors. My counseling values will enable for better understanding of the counseling requirements of different clients and by this, guarantee my ability to focus upon the client’s goals as well as creating the most effective counseling path. In this sense, my ability to uphold the necessary values throughout counseling requires myself to ensure better trustworthiness through honoring the expectations accorded by the clients (Commission of Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, 2017). Upholding the proper values in counseling requires practice of autonomy and beneficence principles that guarantee respect and the essential commitment towards promoting the well-being of the clients.
A.5 Prohibited Non-counseling Roles & Relationships
The CRCC code of ethics prohibits counseling practitioners from engaging in any sexual or romantic relationships with their clients. In this sense, to limit upon complications and any other unforeseeable issues during treatment, counselors have to avoid any romantic or sexual advances from their clients, their family members, or romantic partners. Referring to the CRCC code of ethics, this prohibition should be applicable to both electronic and in-person interactions. As a counselor, the code of ethics also mandate that I prohibit myself from engaging in counseling initiatives with persons to whom I have had previous sexual/romantic relations. Notably, rehabilitation counselors should as well avoid any romantic or sexual relationships with any of their former clients. Under the CRCC code of ethics, the prohibition of sexual affairs with former clients is a necessity for at least 5 years after the termination of the counseling process. With the stipulated requirement as a counselor, there is need to facilitate the documentation of the interaction and relationship in a written form to demonstrate forethought. Through the written consent, the counselor and the client are necessarily in admittance that the relationship/interaction would not be potentially harmful to the client’s recovery process (Lund, et al., 2020). In this case, counselors should determine whether the relationship presents issues pertaining potential exploitation and harm, hence informing on the most appropriate decision to avoid any further interactions.
The CRCC code of ethics also depicts the counselor’s relationship with their clients’ friends or family members. As such, as a counselor you are prohibited from any engagements or else, counseling processes with family members or friends of the clients especially when the interactions are non-objective. I am also under the prohibition of undertaking any virtual interactions through social media with my current clients because such platforms usually facilitate social and personal interactions. By this, I always desist from accepting any social media friendships as well as the disclosure of personal elements about my life to limit on scrutiny (Lund, et al., 2020). Making my life private has been very significant towards retaining the necessary professionalism.
Additionally, rehabilitation counselors should always be considerate of the benefits and risks that emerge because of extending professional boundaries with current/former clients to be inclusive of interactions that are not typical as indicated by CRCC code of ethics. To facilitate the extension of boundaries, it is important to take the appropriate professional precautions that could entail seeking informed consent, consulting other professionals, and undertaking the necessary supervisory measures to limit upon the impairment of judgments. Having great awareness of the risks and benefits of role changes during the contracted counseling relationship has been of great significance throughout my professional career as a counselor because it ensures that I refrain from interaction changes that might harm the client rehabilitation progress (Glosoff and Matrone, 2010). Some of the examples of role changes that I often put into practice entail changing from an individual counseling approach to group, shifting my roles as a counselor to a mediation role, and using research based approaches rather than rehabilitation counseling.
B1. Respecting Client Rights
CRCC code of ethics requires rehabilitation counselors to always be considerate of their clients’ multicultural aspects. As a counselor, I always seek to maintain better sensitivity and awareness standards concerning the cultural meanings of elements like privacy and confidentiality from the client’s perspective. In this sense, the code of ethics mandate that counselors ensure they are respectful of the differing views possessed by different clients towards the disclosure of data/information. As such, I frequently seek to undertake ongoing discussions with my clients regarding how, when, and to whom their information could be shared with. Alternatively, the counseling profession also stipulate to the ethical perspective of ensuring privacy and the need for counselors to respect it (Waldmann and Blackwell, 2010). By this, I always request clients to trust and disclose private information that they would not provide to others freely. In this sense, the notes and private information recorded are used for their own benefit and to ensure the effective realization of the counseling process goals. From the CRCC requirements, it is my obligation to protect the client and help them attain better rehabilitation aspects and treatment. What is needed is for rehabilitation counselors to establish the most appropriate mechanisms of treatment and avoid harming the client through issues such as disclosing their private information or invading their privacy.
Importantly, I consider the respect to confidentiality to be among the most critical aspect of my counseling operations. As a certified counseling practitioner, it is important that I adhere to my client’s confidentiality principle by always protecting the information divulged to me in private. In essence, it is important to only disclose the information/data under the appropriate consent or else, with the provision of ethical and legal justification. Being compliant to the CRCC code of ethics and principles, I have also learnt to always seek the client permission before undertaking any recording of a session. This aspect is necessarily a guarantee of the respect that a counselor should accord to their clients’ privacy and confidentiality. (Landon and Schultz, 2018). Counselors should also seek for the permission to observe prior to reviewing the session transcripts or listening to the session recording with other counselors or supervisors to obtain their professional opinions.
During the initiation of the counseling process, any rehabilitation counselor should ensure that they provide the clients with an explicit explanation of the process limitations. Particularly, I often indicate to the clients in writing about the counseling requirements, how the information and their openness would facilitate the betterment of their treatments, as well as information disclosure paradigms. By explaining to the clients about the limitations, there is guaranteed understanding between the client and the counselor hence the establishment of the necessary trust levels. When explaining issues of privacy and confidentiality, the clients are usually subject to gain utmost confidence such that most will divulge information with informed consent and that the counselor will always protect their private data/information. At the Texas Rehabilitation center, it has always been integral for us as counselors to have implicit understanding of the respective client’s requirements to limit on any violations and to improve upon our service delivery levels (Commission of Rehabilitation Counselor Certification, 2017).
B3. Information Shared with Others
Most of the rehabilitation counselors are usually prone to avoiding casual conversations concerning their clients at the workplace environment. They always need to prioritize on ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of their clients’ information receives utmost respect. With any certified rehabilitation counselor, there is need to advice the subordinate staff like employees and supervisors to maintain the above perspective thus warrant compliance to the various principles under the CRCC code of ethics. The sharing of the clients’ information could also be stipulated in relations to interdisciplinary teams, that is when the services offered requires the rehabilitation counselor to facilitate the sharing of data/information with other team members. By this, it is advisable for counselors to provide the necessary advice during the professional disclosure process to inform the clients of the team existence, composition, and necessarily importance to their recovery process. In this sense, being a practicing counselor, I seek to always ensure my clients receive the highest standards of confidentiality. It is highly reasonable for counselors to face issues that are in violation of the clients’ confidentiality and privacy, hence ensuring compliance requires a counselor to lay emphasis upon keeping the clients’ records safe and secured (Waldmann and Blackwell, 2010). Particularly, I usually maintain my clients’ records locked away in a safe with access usually during client sessions and when in need of client assessments.
Regarding the issue of information sharing, counselors usually face complications because of other professional service providers. For instance, upon learning that a client has ongoing relationship with another professional rehabilitation counselor, it is my duty to ensure I obtain the necessary signed authorization prior to sharing the information. For any counselor, it is always mandatory to seek the client consent and authorization before sharing their confidential information with others. Further, there are some instances whereby the clients are in the company of their assistants. In this case, the clients will need to decide on the appropriate individual who could be present as their assistant (Waldmann and Blackwell, 2010). The client assistants in a counseling setting are usually subject to undertake actions like interpreting, as advocates, and for personal care.
When my clients exercise their freedom to have an assistant present during some of the sessions, I usually inform them about confidentiality and privacy considering counselors have limited control over the assistants. By this, as a counselor, you only need to impress the importance of confidentiality upon the assistants and expecting their adherence because of the trust accorded to them by the clients. Whenever the presence of an assistant proves to be detrimental to the client rehabilitation and progress, it is necessary for any counselor to discuss such concerns with the client prior to undertaking the necessary decision. In case such confidentiality issues are unresolved, as a counselor one could consider the termination of the professional relationship or else, referral of the client to another expert counselor (Landon and Schultz, 2018). With a deceased client, I am obligated to ensure the protection of their confidentiality in accordance with the law, organizational policies, and the respective client preferences documented under the professional disclosure statements.
B4. Groups and Families
Articulating to the CRCC code of ethics, the aspect of group work could be useful towards realizing better client rehabilitation. With group counseling, I am obligated to establish strategic participation tendencies that would warrant the needed environment, which guarantees the attainment of better roles and responsibilities for both the counselor and the respective clients. However, rehabilitation counselors need to ensure that they specify the necessary counseling expectations to ensure that all the client members, maintain better confidentiality levels for the client and thus, guarantee the required counseling process (Fominykh et al., 2018). Working as a rehabilitation counselor, I am usually considerate of both electronic and in-person formats. Through the establishment of the strategic counseling paradigms, my roles and responsibilities as a counselor are well presented. As a rehabilitation counselor, I have great awareness concerning the respective client or else, process expectations especially on issues pertaining confidentiality, privacy, and the eventual address of the respective client treatments/counseling requirements.
As a counseling practitioner, the CRCC code of ethics also pronounces issues relating to family and counseling groups to being subject to the counselors’ ability to emphasize upon the client’s relationships and familial attachments (Lund et al., 2020). Particularly, taking a counseling perspective, the use of family and couples counseling requires counselors to facilitate the development of a clear definition of “what their clients is?” With a clear understanding of who my client is, I am considerably able to determine and thus, discuss the various client counseling expectations as well as my counseling limitations that are known to impact confidentiality, information privacy, and the realization of client’s beneficence.
The rehabilitation and counseling expertise that defines my achievement of the necessary CRCC certifications entail counseling agreements that are characteristic of proper documentation and client disclosure or essential information confidentiality. In this sense, my values and beliefs as a rehabilitation counselor always call for the utilization of writing trends during each and every client’s counseling session. When the client is absent, professionalism is needed (Tarvydas et al., 2010). For instance, with a deceased client or else, the client’s inability to provide an informed consent, it is my obligation to undertake a contradictory agreement strategy, which involves the inclusion of the clients’ couple/partner or family.
D1. Professional Competence
Being a certified professional in the counseling and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities like mental disorders, the deaf, and patients with psychological or else, neurodevelopment issues, it has always been important for me to possess high competence levels. In this sense, my capacity to facilitate better rehabilitation counseling and treatments is characteristic of my competency levels. It is important for rehabilitation counselors to acquire higher counseling education, better training, supervision, and the appropriate professional experiences. Clearly, it is a requirement that I avoid misrepresenting my experiences and competencies as a rehabilitation counselor to the clients (Waldmann & Blackwell, 2010). For example, when dealing with a prospective client, I should clearly present my skills, education, and experience standards prior to providing the client with ‘the professional disclosure statement.’ By doing so, I am able to create the necessary trust, confidence, and autonomy with the clients thus, ensuring the betterment of our client-counselor relationship.
To facilitate the needed professional competency levels, it is important for rehabilitation counselors to adopt new specialties to their counseling practices. Through the research insinuates that rehabilitation counselors usually have to facilitate transitioning into new specialty areas, which require the integration of new core counseling competencies. As a new counseling practitioner, studies further indicates how the commencing of counseling practices require appropriate consultations, better training and supervision. As such, being a new faculty member in counseling operations, I am considerate of the undertaking because with new specialty areas, there is need for new rehabilitation or counseling training/education initiatives meant to increase my skills and work competence. Relating to the CRCC code of ethics, it is also my obligation to facilitate the necessary counselor employment qualifications. As a counselor, I have learnt to accept employment positions in any organization with the underlying focus being my qualifications. My education prowess, training, and other professional credentials like experience as a counselor have necessarily informed my client counseling positions (Fitzgerald et al., 2017). For example, I am quite weak in facilitating the rehabilitation of neurodevelopment or else cognitive issues, hence my perception to always make a referral of clients suffering from such disabilities to other professionals.
The aspect of professional competence also calls for the capacity by counselors to avoid causing more harm to the clients. In this sense, it is our responsibility as rehabilitation counselors to utilize strategies/processes that limit harm to the clients. Mostly, my experience as a counselor has enabled the establishment of better remedies especially to mitigate the effects of unanticipated or unavoidable counseling. Notably, I consider monitoring and evaluation of the applied counseling processes to be compulsory to ensure the steps taken are subject to improve the clients’ performances. The possibility by most rehabilitation counselors to improve their competencies during counseling warrants their acknowledgment of progressive education (Fitzgerald et al., 2017). This aspect is quite proven by various studies because it ensures the acquisition of scientific information and professional skills that enables counselors to increase their skills and understanding of the various disabilities.
D2. Cultural Competence & Diversity
Through the research, professional and certified counselors should always facilitate the inclusion of multicultural and diversity practices. With multicultural practices, any therapist and rehabilitation counselor should input practices meant to offer effective interventions to their different and culturally diverse clientele. To my understanding culture, race, and ethnicity will always impact the client’s life and identity circumstances. Notably, most of the serviced clients in the organization have other influential factors like gender identity, age, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and religion that have essentially affected their rehabilitation and counseling process (Cartwright & Fleming, 2010). Having undertaken the rehabilitation of various clients, I have gained exponential awareness about the effects of my cultural competence on the counseling/treatment processes.
Particularly, I have been able to facilitate the development or else, maintenance of the needed knowledge, sensitivity, personal awareness, and skills needed for a reflective disposition of the individual client’s requirements. Working with a diverse population of clients, culture and social constructs have become quite integral to my counseling process. For example, when a client is from a different cultural background and their understanding of English is minimal, I often seek the services of an assistant to facilitate the interpretation of their cultural/social perspectives. In essence, most of the counseling and treatment paradigms that I use are tailored to become parallel with the client. This strategic counseling process has proven most effective because of increased communication paradigms and understanding between the client and myself as a counselor. The failure by most rehabilitation counselors is mainly attributable to the failure by the counselor to consider the differential cultural issues (Lund et al., 2020). Cultural diversity as such requires myself to input the necessary mechanisms that are in recognition of client diversity aspects like language, religion, and social aspects.
Cultural competence as indicated through the CRCC code of ethics also mandates the counselor to implement interventions that are considerate of the existing clients’ cultural perspectives. With my understanding of the various ethical requirements, my counseling operations are continually characteristic of the implicit adoption of interventions or else, services, which are considerate of the clients’ cultural perspectives. In this sense, my training and professional expertise enables the recognition of external barriers that limit the clients’ ability to achieve effective rehabilitation outcomes (Lund et al., 2020). Alternatively, my operations as a rehabilitation counselor are considerate of elements that detail non-discrimination.
According to Lund et al. (2020), it is of great significance for rehabilitation counselors to always limit their possibility of condoning prejudicial treatments. With cases of prejudice and discriminations, a counseling practitioner incorporates a pre-conceived ideology about the client, thus affecting their ability to facilitate effective rehabilitation of treatments. When it comes to cultural understanding and diversity at the Texas counseling and rehabilitation center, we as rehabilitation counselors have learnt to accommodate the existing values and differences between clients. I in particular have always been considerate of the cultural values and preferences of the clients and thus always using these elements to determine and approach the rehabilitation and counseling.
D3. Functional Competence
Under the CRCC code of ethics, rehabilitation counselors should lay emphasis upon their functional and operations competence levels. According to the research, rehabilitation counselors need to ensure they exercise better alert levels to limit on impairment that usually arise due to personal circumstances. Being a certified counselor, I have always been seeking to dissociate my personal circumstances from the client experiences. By this, my professional services are usually characteristic of limited personal impairment issues because my experience in the field always calls the limited involvement of my personal values, behaviors, and beliefs throughout the rehabilitation/treatment process. Taking my professional standards and compliance with CRCC ethics, I have always been seeking professional assistance when facing any challenge and counseling impairment that affects the client progress. Considering my counseling practice, my professional supervisors and other colleagues have been integral towards my progressions as a rehabilitation counselor. In this sense, most of my supervisors recognize my professional impairment aspects and with their consultations, they have essentially assisted in my progress (Cartwright & Fleming, 2010). Through the necessary consultations and assistance, insinuate that most of the new rehabilitation counselors are able to attain better standards and expertise.
Alternatively, my functional competence as counselor details need to always facilitate strategic disaster preparation and response. This element requires me to be available to undertake the necessary initiatives whenever my country experiences natural, terror related, and any other disastrous elements. As a rehabilitation counselor, my understanding about people, stressful situations, and other issues affecting the society ensures that I would be capable in addressing and helping affected persons. Disaster preparedness Texas Workforce Solutions as a vocational rehabilitation center is usually to facilitate the provision of better counseling and rehabilitation services that guarantee the essential improvement of the clients with disabilities (Lund et al., 2020). By this, my participation in the Texas rehabilitation center has been quite important towards improving the conditions of adults and students with disabilities like mental, physical, and neurodevelopment disorders. Any disasters affecting my community will require my organization Texas Workforce Solutions Vocational Rehabilitation Services to undertake the necessary strategies and thus, incorporate ‘us’ as rehabilitation counselors in the respective counseling of the affected people and thus, the attainment of better disaster responses and recovery initiatives.
Most importantly, I have been participating in community driven initiatives that aspire towards helping individuals suffering from various disabilities towards gaining better life standards and dependency. It has been very clear that to improve ones’ competencies; it is significant for them to always get involved in trainings and other professional works such as helping individuals affected by disasters. My involvement in various community based initiatives as a rehabilitation counselor enables my interactions with other professionals. This aspect further guarantees that I gain the necessary experience and expertise from others. For example, upon my interaction with another professional, I was able to learn about the best ways to approach situations affecting people with neurodevelopment disorders and mental issues (Glosoff & Matrone, 2010). By this, I am now capable of addressing challenging effects facing most of my clients irrespective of their conditions.
References
Cartwright, B. Y., & Fleming, C. L. (2010). Multicultural and diversity considerations in the new
code of professional ethics for rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53(4), 213-217.
Commission of Rehabilitation Counselor Certification. (2017). Code of professional ethics for
rehabilitation counselors. Schaumburg, IL: Author.
Glosoff, H. L., & Rocco Cottone, R. (2010). Rehabilitation counselor education and the new
code of ethics. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53(4), 243-248.
Glosoff, H. L., & Matrone, K. F. (2010). Ethical issues in rehabilitation counselor supervision
and the new 2010 code of ethics. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 41(2), 54-59.
Fitzgerald, S., Leahy, M. J., Kang, H. J., Chan, F., & Bezyak, J. (2017). Perceived preparedness
to implement evidence-based practice by certified rehabilitation counselors: A qualitative content analysis. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 60(4), 203-214.
Fominykh, M., Leong, P., & Cartwright, B. (2018). Role-playing and experiential learning in a
professional counseling distance course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(2), 169-190.
Landon, T. J., & Schultz, J. C. (2018). Exploring rehabilitation counseling supervisors’ role in
promoting counselor development of ethical fluency. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 62(1), 18-29.
Lund, E. M., Schultz, J. C., Thomas, K. B., Nadorff, M. R., Chowdhury, D., & Galbraith, K.
(2020). “It’s awful when we get it wrong”: An exploratory qualitative study of vocational rehabilitation counselors’ perspectives on suicide. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 81(4), 551-566.
Tarvydas, V., Cottone, R. R., & Saunders, J. S. (2010). A new ethics code as a tool for
innovations in ethical practice.
Waldmann, A. K., & Blackwell, T. L. (2010). Advocacy and accessibility standards in the new
code of professional ethics for rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 41(2), 37-41.
CRCC CODE OF ETHICS
Reflection
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
CRCC CODE OF ETHICS
Reflection
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date