MILESTONE 3

CourseProjectMilestone3Guidelines.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >MILESTONE 3

Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines

Updated 9/2018

Purpose

To apply lessons in quality improvement in nursing to a real world nursing issue. This Course Project will use the Six Sigma DMAIC process.

Points

The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total.

Requirements and Guidelines

1. Download the required Milestone 3 Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. . Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR392 Milestone 3.docx.

2. Milestone 3 is a continuation of and builds upon Milestones 1 and 2. Review the grading criteria and grading rubric for details about requirements including three interventions and evaluation of each.

3. A peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (not a website) that is appropriate to the nursing care issue must be obtained from CINAHL via the Chamberlain Online Library and must be available in full text. Use APA format to cite and reference this article. You will write a short summary of this article.

4. Carefully review the assigned areas for Milestone 3 and type directly on your saved Milestone 3 Template.

5. Submit your completed Milestone 3 Template by Sunday at end of Week 6.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser's File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR392_Milestone3 Sept18

NR392_Milestone3 Sept18

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBrief Statement of Nursing Care Issue

Clearly and briefly state the nursing care issue that is the topic for the course project.

15.0 pts

Clearly and briefly states the nursing care issue that is the topic for the course project.

13.0 pts

Statement of the nursing care issue is mostly clear and mostly brief.

12.0 pts

Clarity and/or brevity are only fair for the statement of the nursing care issue.

6.0 pts

Clarity and brevity are poor. May or may not state the same topic approved from previous milestones.

0.0 pts

Did not state the nursing care issue.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Interventions #1 to Improve Quality

List three (3) detailed appropriate interventions designed to improve the quality of your selected nursing care issue. At least one intervention must be supported by information from the professional article you selected. An APA citation must be included with that intervention.

40.0 pts

Intervention #1 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue.

35.0 pts

Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue.

32.0 pts

Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair.

15.0 pts

Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor.

0.0 pts

Did not submit intervention.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Intervention #2 to Improve Quality

40.0 pts

Intervention #2 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue.

35.0 pts

Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue.

32.0 pts

Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair.

15.0 pts

Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor.

0.0 pts

Did not submit intervention.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Intervention #3 to Improve Quality

40.0 pts

Intervention #3 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue.

35.0 pts

Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue.

32.0 pts

Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair.

15.0 pts

Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor.

0.0 pts

Did not submit intervention.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Professional Article to Support Interventions

Provide a reference in APA format for one (1) peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article retrieved in full text from CINAHL. Provide a citation in APA format with the intervention in the above category that is supported by that article.

25.0 pts

Reference and citation for very appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in excellent APA format.

22.0 pts

Reference and citation for mostly appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in good APA format.

20.0 pts

Reference and citation for somewhat appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in fair APA format.

10.0 pts

Article is not appropriate to the nursing issue, not peer-reviewed, OR not available in CINAHL in full text. OR reference and citation use poor APA format. OR may not submit one item (reference or citation).

0.0 pts

Did not submit an article reference, citation, or summary.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary

Write a brief summary of the article using 80-100 words.

50.0 pts

Summary is very clear and thorough in 80-100 words.

44.0 pts

Summary is mostly clear and thorough in 80-100 words.

40.0 pts

Summary is fairly clear and thorough in 80-100 words.

19.0 pts

Summary is unclear and/or not thorough.

0.0 pts

Did not submit a summary.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC: Control/ Evaluation #1

Explain detailed evaluation plans for each of the three interventions listed to identify how you would determine if quality is improved by each intervention.

30.0 pts

For #1, explains very appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention.

26.0 pts

Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention.

24.0 pts

Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention

11.0 pts

Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved.

0.0 pts

No evaluation plan provided.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC: Control/ Evaluation #2

Explain detailed evaluation plans for each of the three interventions listed to identify how you would determine if quality is improved by each intervention.

30.0 pts

For #2, explains very appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention.

26.0 pts

Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention.

24.0 pts

Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention

11.0 pts

Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved.

0.0 pts

No evaluation plan provided.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC: Control/ Evaluation #3

Explain detailed evaluation plans for each of the three interventions listed to identify how you would determine if quality is improved by each intervention.

30.0 pts

For #3, explains very appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention.

26.0 pts

Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention.

24.0 pts

Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan. Evaluation plan has fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention

11.0 pts

Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved.

0.0 pts

No evaluation plan provided.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Template Used

0.0 pts

-30 points (10% of score)

Incorrect or no template used.

0.0 pts

Correct Template Used

0.0 pts

Total Points: 300.0

Previous Next