Managerial accounting
Ch.4 Process Board
| Chapter 4 | |||||
| Process Costing | HSO TOY COMPANY | ||||
| Data Set: | |||||
| RawMaterial | DirectLabor | Mfg.OverHead | Total | ||
| Beginning Inventory | $10,000 | $1,060 | $1,620 | $12,680 | |
| Units | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| % complete | 100% | 30% | 40% | ||
| Equivalent units | 10,000 | 3,000 | 4,000 | ||
| Units started in period | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | |
| Units completed in period | 44,000 | 44,000 | 44,000 | 44,000 | |
| Cost incurred in period | $44,000 | $22,440 | $43,600 | $110,040 | |
| Units to be accounted for = Beg + started | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| Ending Inventory | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | |
| % complete | 100% | 50% | 60% | ||
| Equivalent units | 6,000 | 3,000 | 3,600 | ||
| A. Ending Inventory Value using Weighted Average | |||||
| Use Beginning Inventory + Period costs | |||||
| RM | DL | MOH | Total | ||
| Beginning Inventory | $10,000 | $1,060 | $1,620 | $12,680 | |
| Cost incurred in period | $44,000 | $22,440 | $43,600 | $110,040 | |
| Beginning + Period $s = Ending Inventory $s | $54,000 | $23,500 | $45,220 | $122,720 | |
| Completed units @ 100% | 44,000 | 44,000 | 44,000 | ||
| Ending Inventory Equivalent units | 6,000 | 3,000 | 3,600 | ||
| Total Beg. + Period equivalent units | 50,000 | 47,000 | 47,600 | ||
| Cost per Equivalent unit | $1.08 | $0.50 | $0.95 | $2.53 | |
| for units to next area | |||||
| Ending Equivalent units | 6,000 | 3,000 | 3,600 | ||
| Ending inventory value | $6,480 | $1,500 | $3,420 | $11,400 | |
| A. Ending Inventory Value using FIFO | |||||
| Use Beginning Inventory + Period costs | |||||
| RM | DL | MOH | Total | ||
| Beginning inventory Units | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||
| Beginning inventory: Equivalent units | 10,000 | 3,000 | 4,000 | ||
| Period work to complete Beginning units | 0% | 70% | 60% | ||
| Period equivalent units production | |||||
| to complete beginning inventory | 0 | 7,000 | 6,000 | ||
| Units started | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
| Units completed | 44,000 | 44,000 | 44,000 | ||
| Completed & started in period [less beginning] | 34,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 | ||
| = equivalent units for period completed | 34,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 | ||
| Ending Inventory | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||
| % complete | 100% | 50% | 60% | ||
| Equivalent Enduing units | 6,000 | 3,000 | 3,600 | ||
| Work done in Period in Equivalent units | |||||
| Beginning | 0 | 7,000 | 6,000 | ||
| Started & completed in period | 34,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 | ||
| Ending Equivalent units | 6,000 | 3,000 | 3,600 | ||
| Total Equivalent work in period | 40,000 | 44,000 | 43,600 | ||
| Cost incurred in period | $44,000 | $22,440 | $43,600 | $110,040 | |
| FIFO cost per equivalent unit | $1.10 | $0.51 | $1.00 | $2.61 | |
| Ending Inventory value [ Eq. Units x cost/ea.] | $6,600 | $1,530 | $3,600 | $11,730 |
Ch. 4 slides 40-50
| Ch.4 Process cost | ||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Inventory Valuation Method (FIFO Average) | Same if total overhead | Weighted average | Assembly Department | |||||||||||||||
| Department: SMD | Materials | Materials | Materials | Materials | Conversion = DL + Variable Overhead | Total $ | Cost Reconciliation / Weighted Average Method | |||||||||||
| Units | $ | % complete | Equiv. Units | Units | $ | % complete | Equiv. Units | Costs to be accounted for: | ||||||||||
| Qty | $ | % | Eq. Qty | Qty | $ | % | Eq. Qty | Cost of beginning Work in Process Inventory | $15,175 | |||||||||
| Beginning | 200 | 200 | $9,600 | 55% | 110 | 200 | $5,575 | 30% | 60 | $ 15,175 | Costs added to production during the period | $729,500 | ||||||
| Total cost to be accounted for | $744,675 | |||||||||||||||||
| Started | 5000 | 5000 | $378,600 | 5000 | $350,900 | added in period | $ 729,500 | Total costs to be accounted | $744,675 | |||||||||
| solve | Completed | 4800 | 4800 | 100% | 4800 | 4800 | 100% | 4800 | ||||||||||
| 10000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ending | -400 | 400 | 40% | 160 | 400 | 25% | 100 | |||||||||||
| Cost accounted for as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equivalent Production | $388,200 | 4960 | $356,475 | 4900 | 200 | $356,475 | Cost of units transferred out | $ 724,877 | ||||||||||
| Ending WIP Inventory | $19,798 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total $ for Wghtd. Avgr. inventory valuation | $378,200 | $356,475 | $ 734,675 | 200 | Cost of ending Work in Process Inventory | $19,798 | ||||||||||||
| Per unit | $78.27 | $72.75 | $ 744,675 | 5000 | 4900 | Ending WIP Inventory | $ 19,798 | |||||||||||
| 5200 | 72.75 | Total cost accounted for | $ 744,675 | |||||||||||||||
| To next department | 4800 | $375,677 | 100% | 4800 | 4800 | $349,200 | 100% | 4800 | $ 724,877 | |||||||||
| Ending WIP for SMD | 400 | $12,523 | 40% | 160 | 400 | $7,275 | 25% | 100 | $ 19,798 | 4800 | $72.75 | |||||||
| $388,200 | 4960 | $356,475 | 4900 | $ 744,675 | 400 | 100 | End | |||||||||||
| 0.00 | 5200 | $7,275 | End Inv. $ | |||||||||||||||
| FIFO: | Appendix A | Same if total overhead | ||||||||||||||||
| Department: SMD | Materials | Conversion = DL + Variable Overhead | Total $ | F I F O | ||||||||||||||
| Units | $ | % complete | Equiv. Units | Units | $ | % complete | Equiv. Units | |||||||||||
| M | ||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | 200 | $9,600 | 55% | 110 | 200 | $5,575 | 30% | 60 | $ 15,175 | 90 | ||||||||
| Completion of beginning units | 45% | 90 | to complete beginning | 70% | 140 | 4600 | ||||||||||||
| 160 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Started | 5000 | $378,600 | 5000 | $350,900 | $ 719,500 | 4850 | ||||||||||||
| Completed | 4800 | 100% | 4800 | 100% | 4800 | LOH | ||||||||||||
| 140 | to finish beginning | |||||||||||||||||
| Started & completed this period | 4600 | 100% | 4600 | 4600 | 100% | 4600 | 4600 | start & complete | ||||||||||
| 100 | End Eq. Qty | |||||||||||||||||
| Ending | 400 | 40% | 160 | 400 | 25% | 100 | 4840 | |||||||||||
| Equivalent Production | $378,600 | 4850 | Work done in the period only | 4840 | ||||||||||||||
| Total $ for FIFO | $378,600 | $350,900 | $ 719,500 | $350,900 | ||||||||||||||
| Per unit | $78.06 | $72.50 | $ 150.56 | 4840 | ||||||||||||||
| 72.50 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||
| To next department | 4800 | $376,040 | 100% | 4800 | 4800 | $349,225 | 100% | 4800 | $ 725,265 | $ 7,250 | ||||||||
| Ending WIP for SMD | 400 | $12,160 | 40% | 160 | 400 | $7,250 | 25% | 100 | $ 19,410 | |||||||||
| $378,200 | 4960 | $356,475 | 4900 | $ 744,675 | ||||||||||||||
| Ending Inventory | Qty | $ | % compl. | Eq. Qty | Qty | $ | % compl. | Eq. Qty | Total | |||||||||
| Weighted Average | 400 | $12,523 | 40% | 160 | 400 | $7,275 | 0.25 | 100 | $19,798 | |||||||||
| FiFO | 400 | $12,160 | 40% | 160 | 400 | $7,250 | 0.25 | 100 | $19,410 | |||||||||
| difference | 0 | $ 362.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ 25.00 | 0 | 0 | $ 387.58 | |||||||||
| Per unit | $0.20 | $0.25 | ||||||||||||||||
| $78.27 | $72.75 | |||||||||||||||||
| $78.06 | $72.50 | |||||||||||||||||
| $0.20 | $0.25 | |||||||||||||||||
| Separate File tab "Cost Allocaton" | ||||||||||||||||||
| Maintenance | ||||||||||||||||||
| $600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 37.50% | Machining | $225,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| 62.50% | Assembly | $375,000 | + | |||||||||||||||
| IT | ||||||||||||||||||
| $116,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 88.9% | Machining | $103,111 | ||||||||||||||||
| 11.1% | Assembly | $12,889 | ||||||||||||||||
| 600000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reciprocal Method | ||||||||||||||||||
| Function A: with reciprocal allocation of OH | Function A = Maintenance | |||||||||||||||||
| Function B = IT | ||||||||||||||||||
| Function A with reciprocal allocation = | ||||||||||||||||||
| Function A Spending + (Function A % usage of Function B X Function B Spending) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Maintenance = | $600000 + (10% X IT) | |||||||||||||||||
| IT = | $116000 + (20% X Maintenance) | |||||||||||||||||
| Maintenance = | $600000 + 10% X ($116000 + (20% X Maintainance)) | |||||||||||||||||
| $600000 + 10% X $116000 + 10% X (20% X Maintenance) | ||||||||||||||||||
| $600000 + $116000 + 2% X Maintanance | ||||||||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $600000 + $11600 | |||||||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $600000 + $11600 | |||||||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $611,600 | |||||||||||||||||
| ah | 100% Maintenance = | $ 624,082 | ||||||||||||||||
| IT = $116000 +20%*PM | ||||||||||||||||||
| IT = $116000 +20%*$624082 | Reciprocal | Budget | Allocated | |||||||||||||||
| ai | IT = $116000 + $124816 | $ 624,082 | $ - 0 | - 0 | ||||||||||||||
| IT = | $ 240,816 | $ 240,816 | $ - 0 | - 0 | ||||||||||||||
| $ 864,898 | $ - 0 | - 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Machining + | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assembly | ||||||||||||||||||
| PM | IT | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| $ 624,082 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | ah X ad | ||||||||||||||
| 240,816 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | ai X af | ||||||||||||||
| Functional FOH→ | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | ab | ||||||||||||||
| $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||||||
80%
90%
Ch.4 Cost Alloc
| ACC302 | |||||||||||||
| Chapter 15 ACC302 /// Chapter 4 ACC220 | |||||||||||||
| Allocation of Costs | |||||||||||||
| HC Tamburro | |||||||||||||
| Single & Dual Rate Methods: | |||||||||||||
| Data Set: #1 | |||||||||||||
| Amount | From | To | |||||||||||
| a | Relevant Range hours | 11,000 | 13,500 | ||||||||||
| b | Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | |||||||||||
| c | Practical Capacity | 18,750 | Hours | ||||||||||
| d | Master Budget 2xx1: Peripherals | 8,000 | hours | ||||||||||
| e | Master Budget 2xx1: Microcomputers | 4,000 | hours | ||||||||||
| f | Total Budgeted Hours | 12,000 | hours | ||||||||||
| g | Master Budget Variable OH | $ 200.00 | hour | ||||||||||
| h | Actual 2xx1: Peripherals | 9,000 | |||||||||||
| i | Actual 2xx1: Microcomputers | 3,000 | |||||||||||
| j | Total Actual Hours | 12,000 | |||||||||||
| Single Rate/Single Pool | |||||||||||||
| k | Total Variable OH Budget | $ 2,400,000 | g*f | ||||||||||
| Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | +b | |||||||||||
| l | Total Overhead Pool | $ 5,400,000 | + k + i | ||||||||||
| Rate per Hour | |||||||||||||
| m | Microcomputers | $ 450.00 | + l / f | ||||||||||
| n | peripherals | $ 450.00 | + l / f | ||||||||||
| Dual Rate/Single Pool | |||||||||||||
| b | Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | |||||||||||
| f | Total Budgeted Hours | 12,000 | |||||||||||
| p | Fixed OH Rate | $ 250.00 | + b / f | ||||||||||
| g | Master Budget Variable OH | $ 200.00 | |||||||||||
| q | Combined Fixed & Variable | $ 450.00 | + p + g | ||||||||||
| Data Set: #2 | |||||||||||||
| Assuming actual = Budget for variable OH rates | |||||||||||||
| Review Fixed OH only | |||||||||||||
| Isolation of change in hours only | |||||||||||||
| Actual hours | |||||||||||||
| Case | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
| r | Microcomputers | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | |||||||||
| s | Peripherals | 4,000 | 7,000 | 2,000 | |||||||||
| t | Totals: | 12,000 | 15,000 | 10,000 | |||||||||
| Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | b | |||||||||
| Actual Hours @ Total Budget OH | |||||||||||||
| u | Microcomputers | $ 2,000,000 | $ 1,600,000 | $ 2,400,000 | + (r / t) * b | ||||||||
| v | Peripherals | $ 1,000,000 | $ 1,400,000 | $ 600,000 | + (s / t) * b | ||||||||
| b | Total: | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | + u + v | ||||||||
| Rate per hour | Actual Hours @ Total Budget OH | ||||||||||||
| w | Microcomputers | $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 | $ 300.00 | + u / r | ||||||||
| x | Peripherals | $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 | $ 300.00 | + v / s | ||||||||
| z | Diff: Master Budg. Single Rate | ||||||||||||
| aa | Microcomputers | $ - 0 | $ 50.00 | $ (50.00) | |||||||||
| Peripherals | $ - 0 | $ 50.00 | $ (50.00) | ||||||||||
| ACC 220 Start here | data references from #3 | Maintenance | IT | ||||||||||
| Data Set: #3 | Production Only | 2,400 | 1600 | 88.9% | |||||||||
| Support Departments | Operating Departments | 4,000 | 2,400 | 37.5% | 200 | 11.1% | |||||||
| Maintenance | IT Support | Machining | Assembly | Total: | 6,400 | 4,000 | 62.5% | 1800 | |||||
| ab | Functional Spending $s | $ 600,000 | $ 116,000 | $ 400,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 1,316,000 | |||||||
| ac | Units: Hours | 1,600 | 2,400 | 4,000 | 8,000 | Production Hrs. | |||||||
| ad | % | 20.0% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Without support functions | 0.0% | 37.5% | 62.5% | $ 600,000 | 225000 | 37.5% | Maintenance | ||||||
| $ 116,000 | 103111 | 88.9% | IT Support | ||||||||||
| ae | Computer Hours | 200 | 1600 | 200 | 2,000 | 328111 | |||||||
| af | % | 10.0% | 80.0% | 10.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Without support functions | 88.9% | 11.1% | $ 600,000 | $ 375,000 | 62.5% | ||||||||
| without service to service | $ 116,000 | $ 12,889 | 11.1% | ||||||||||
| Data Set: #4 | 387889 | ||||||||||||
| Direct Method of Overhead Allocation | |||||||||||||
| Allocate from Support direct to operating | |||||||||||||
| ag | Total Operating depts. Hours | 6,400 | ac operating depts. | ||||||||||
| ah | support cost-rate per hour | Maintenance | $ 93.75 | + 'ab' Maint. / 'ac' opera. hours | |||||||||
| ai | support cost-rate per hour | Assembly | 64.44 | + 'ab' IT. / 'ac' opera. hours | |||||||||
| Maintenance | IT Support | ||||||||||||
| Allocated support costs | Maintenance | IT Support | $ 600,000 | $ 600,000 | $ 116,000 | $ 116,000 | |||||||
| aj | Machining | 225,000 | 103,111 | + ac opera * ah , ai | 37.5% | 62.5% | 88.9% | 11.1% | |||||
| ak | Assembly | 375,000 | 12,889 | + ac mach * ah , ai | $ 225,000 | $ 375,000 | $ 103,111 | $ 12,889 | |||||
| al | Total | 600,000 | 116,000 | Machining | Assembly | Machining | Assembly | ||||||
| Direct Fixed OH costs | Direct | Allocated | Total | Rate | Maintenance | IT Support | SUM | ||||||
| az | +ab + aj | Machining | 400,000 | 328,111 | 728,111 | $ 303.38 | 225,000 | 103,111 | 328,111 | ||||
| ax | +ab + ak | Assembly | 200,000 | 387,889 | 587,889 | $ 146.97 | 375,000 | 12,889 | 387,889 | ||||
| aw | + az + ax | Total | 600,000 | 716,000 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||
| Step Down Method of Overhead Allocation | allocate service to service // set hierarchy | ||||||||||||
| Maintenance is deemed Step 1 or higher in hierarchy for allocation | |||||||||||||
| Support Departments | Operating Departments | ||||||||||||
| Maintenance | IT Support | Machining | Assembly | Total: | |||||||||
| ac | Hours work done by maint. | 1,600 | 2,400 | 4,000 | 8,000 | ||||||||
| ad | % | 20.0% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | $ 600,000 | Maintenance | ||||||
| $ (120,000) | to IT | 20.0% | |||||||||||
| ae | IT base = Computer Hours | 200 | 1600 | 200 | 2,000 | $ 480,000 | M to Prodn | ||||||
| af | % | 10.0% | 80.0% | 10.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Funtion spending above | |||||||||||||
| ab | Functional Spending $s | $ 600,000 | $ 116,000 | $ 400,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 1,316,000 | $ 600,000 | 30.0% | Machining | $ 180,000 | |||
| Maint to prodn. | $ 600,000 | 50.0% | Assembly | $ 300,000 | |||||||||
| ac From Maint. To all Functions | $ 120,000 | $ 180,000 | $ 300,000 | $ 600,000 | + ab Maint. ad % | ||||||||
| ad | Subtotal: | $ 236,000 | $ 580,000 | $ 500,000 | $ 1,316,000 | ||||||||
| ae | Operating % of IT | 88.9% | 11.1% | 100.0% | af w/out Maint.% | $ 236,000 | $ 236,000 | ||||||
| af | From IT to Opera. Depts. | $ 209,778 | $ 26,222 | $ 236,000 | + af * ad IT | Prod. Only % | 88.9% | 11.1% | |||||
| From IT after alloc from M | $ 209,778 | $ 26,222 | |||||||||||
| ag | Total: | $ 789,778 | $ 526,222 | $ 1,316,000 | + af + ag | Machining | Assembly | ||||||
| 80%/90% | 10%/90% | ||||||||||||
| Reciprocal Method | |||||||||||||
| Function A: with reciprocal allocation of OH | Function A = Maintenance | ||||||||||||
| Function B = IT | |||||||||||||
| Function A with reciprocal allocation = | |||||||||||||
| Function A Spending + (Function A % usage of Function B X Function B Spending) | |||||||||||||
| Maintenance = | $600000 + (10% X IT) | ||||||||||||
| IT = | $116000 + (20% X Maintenance) | IT = ($116000 + (20% X Maintainance)) | |||||||||||
| Maintenance = | $600000 + 10% X ($116000 + (20% X Maintainance)) | ||||||||||||
| $600000 + 10% X $116000 + 10% X (20% X Maintenance) | |||||||||||||
| $600000 + $116000 + 2% X Maintanance | |||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $600000 + $11600 | ||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $600000 + $11600 | ||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $611,600 | ||||||||||||
| ah | 100% Maintenance = | $ 624,082 | |||||||||||
| IT = $116000 +20%*PM | |||||||||||||
| IT = $116000 +20%*$624082 | Reciprocal | Budget | Allocated | ||||||||||
| ai | IT = $116000 + $124816 | $ 624,082 | $ 600,000 | 499,265 | |||||||||
| IT = | $ 240,816 | $ 240,816 | $ 116,000 | 216,734 | |||||||||
| $ 864,898 | $ 716,000 | 716,000 | |||||||||||
| Machining + | |||||||||||||
| Assembly | |||||||||||||
| PM | IT | Machining | Assembly | Total: | |||||||||
| $ 624,082 | 187,224 | 312,041 | 499,265 | ah X ad | |||||||||
| 240,816 | 192,653 | 24,082 | 216,734 | ai X af | |||||||||
| Functional FOH→ | 400,000 | 200,000 | 600,000 | ab | |||||||||
| $ 779,877 | $ 536,122 | $ 1,316,000 | |||||||||||
| Comparison of Methods | Machining + | ||||||||||||
| Assembly | |||||||||||||
| Machining | Assembly | Total: | |||||||||||
| Direct Method of Overhead Allocation | 728,111 | 587,889 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||||
| Step Down Method of Overhead Allocation | 789,778 | 526,222 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||||
| Reciprocal Method | 779,877 | 536,122 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||||
| Incremental Cost Allocation | |||||||||||||
| Identify primary use | |||||||||||||
| Identify secondary use | |||||||||||||
| Aloocate primary amount of cost to primary use | |||||||||||||
| Allocate incrment over primary to secondary | |||||||||||||
| Value @ cost | Tons | ||||||||||||
| Extract Aluminum fro Ore | 12,000,000 | 24,000,000 | |||||||||||
| Gold is extracted as well | 1,200,000 | 0.0536 | |||||||||||
| Total cost to extract | 6,100,000 | ||||||||||||
| Withuot extracting Gold | 6,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Incremental cost assigned to gold | 100,000 |
80%
90%
Ch. Process Cost #1
| ACC302 | |||||||||||||
| Chapter 15 ACC302 /// Chapter 4 ACC220 | |||||||||||||
| Allocation of Costs | |||||||||||||
| HC Tamburro | |||||||||||||
| Single & Dual Rate Methods: | |||||||||||||
| Data Set: #1 | |||||||||||||
| Amount | From | To | |||||||||||
| a | Relevant Range hours | 11,000 | 13,500 | ||||||||||
| b | Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | |||||||||||
| c | Practical Capacity | 18,750 | Hours | ||||||||||
| d | Master Budget 2xx1: Peripherals | 8,000 | hours | ||||||||||
| e | Master Budget 2xx1: Microcomputers | 4,000 | hours | ||||||||||
| f | Total Budgeted Hours | 12,000 | hours | ||||||||||
| g | Master Budget Variable OH | $ 200.00 | hour | ||||||||||
| h | Actual 2xx1: Peripherals | 9,000 | |||||||||||
| i | Actual 2xx1: Microcomputers | 3,000 | |||||||||||
| j | Total Actual Hours | 12,000 | |||||||||||
| Single Rate/Single Pool | |||||||||||||
| k | Total Variable OH Budget | $ 2,400,000 | g*f | ||||||||||
| Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | +b | |||||||||||
| l | Total Overhead Pool | $ 5,400,000 | + k + i | ||||||||||
| Rate per Hour | |||||||||||||
| m | Microcomputers | $ 450.00 | + l / f | ||||||||||
| n | peripherals | $ 450.00 | + l / f | ||||||||||
| Dual Rate/Single Pool | |||||||||||||
| b | Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | |||||||||||
| f | Total Budgeted Hours | 12,000 | |||||||||||
| p | Fixed OH Rate | $ 250.00 | + b / f | ||||||||||
| g | Master Budget Variable OH | $ 200.00 | |||||||||||
| q | Combined Fixed & Variable | $ 450.00 | + p + g | ||||||||||
| Data Set: #2 | |||||||||||||
| Assuming actual = Budget for variable OH rates | |||||||||||||
| Review Fixed OH only | |||||||||||||
| Isolation of change in hours only | |||||||||||||
| Actual hours | |||||||||||||
| Case | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
| r | Microcomputers | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | |||||||||
| s | Peripherals | 4,000 | 7,000 | 2,000 | |||||||||
| t | Totals: | 12,000 | 15,000 | 10,000 | |||||||||
| Master Budget Fixed Manufacturing Costs | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | b | |||||||||
| Actual Hours @ Total Budget OH | |||||||||||||
| u | Microcomputers | $ 2,000,000 | $ 1,600,000 | $ 2,400,000 | + (r / t) * b | ||||||||
| v | Peripherals | $ 1,000,000 | $ 1,400,000 | $ 600,000 | + (s / t) * b | ||||||||
| b | Total: | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | + u + v | ||||||||
| Rate per hour | Actual Hours @ Total Budget OH | ||||||||||||
| w | Microcomputers | $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 | $ 300.00 | + u / r | ||||||||
| x | Peripherals | $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 | $ 300.00 | + v / s | ||||||||
| z | Diff: Master Budg. Single Rate | ||||||||||||
| aa | Microcomputers | $ - 0 | $ 50.00 | $ (50.00) | |||||||||
| Peripherals | $ - 0 | $ 50.00 | $ (50.00) | ||||||||||
| ACC 220 Start here | data references from #3 | Maintenance | IT | ||||||||||
| Data Set: #3 | Production Only | 2,400 | 1600 | 88.9% | |||||||||
| Support Departments | Operating Departments | 4,000 | 2,400 | 37.5% | 200 | 11.1% | |||||||
| Maintenance | IT Support | Machining | Assembly | Total: | 6,400 | 4,000 | 62.5% | 1800 | |||||
| ab | Functional Spending $s | $ 600,000 | $ 116,000 | $ 400,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 1,316,000 | |||||||
| ac | Units: Hours | 1,600 | 2,400 | 4,000 | 8,000 | Production Hrs. | |||||||
| ad | % | 20.0% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Without support functions | 0.0% | 37.5% | 62.5% | $ 600,000 | 225000 | 37.5% | Maintenance | ||||||
| $ 116,000 | 103111 | 88.9% | IT Support | ||||||||||
| ae | Computer Hours | 200 | 1600 | 200 | 2,000 | 328111 | |||||||
| af | % | 10.0% | 80.0% | 10.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Without support functions | 88.9% | 11.1% | $ 600,000 | $ 375,000 | 62.5% | ||||||||
| without service to service | $ 116,000 | $ 12,889 | 11.1% | ||||||||||
| Data Set: #4 | 387889 | ||||||||||||
| Direct Method of Overhead Allocation | |||||||||||||
| Allocate from Support direct to operating | |||||||||||||
| ag | Total Operating depts. Hours | 6,400 | ac operating depts. | ||||||||||
| ah | support cost-rate per hour | Maintenance | $ 93.75 | + 'ab' Maint. / 'ac' opera. hours | |||||||||
| ai | support cost-rate per hour | Assembly | 64.44 | + 'ab' IT. / 'ac' opera. hours | |||||||||
| Maintenance | IT Support | ||||||||||||
| Allocated support costs | Maintenance | IT Support | $ 600,000 | $ 600,000 | $ 116,000 | $ 116,000 | |||||||
| aj | Machining | 225,000 | 103,111 | + ac opera * ah , ai | 37.5% | 62.5% | 88.9% | 11.1% | |||||
| ak | Assembly | 375,000 | 12,889 | + ac mach * ah , ai | $ 225,000 | $ 375,000 | $ 103,111 | $ 12,889 | |||||
| al | Total | 600,000 | 116,000 | Machining | Assembly | Machining | Assembly | ||||||
| Direct Fixed OH costs | Direct | Allocated | Total | Rate | Maintenance | IT Support | SUM | ||||||
| az | +ab + aj | Machining | 400,000 | 328,111 | 728,111 | $ 303.38 | 225,000 | 103,111 | 328,111 | ||||
| ax | +ab + ak | Assembly | 200,000 | 387,889 | 587,889 | $ 146.97 | 375,000 | 12,889 | 387,889 | ||||
| aw | + az + ax | Total | 600,000 | 716,000 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||
| Step Down Method of Overhead Allocation | allocate service to service // set hierarchy | ||||||||||||
| Maintenance is deemed Step 1 or higher in hierarchy for allocation | |||||||||||||
| Support Departments | Operating Departments | ||||||||||||
| Maintenance | IT Support | Machining | Assembly | Total: | |||||||||
| ac | Hours work done by maint. | 1,600 | 2,400 | 4,000 | 8,000 | ||||||||
| ad | % | 20.0% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | $ 600,000 | Maintenance | ||||||
| $ (120,000) | to IT | 20.0% | |||||||||||
| ae | IT base = Computer Hours | 200 | 1600 | 200 | 2,000 | $ 480,000 | M to Prodn | ||||||
| af | % | 10.0% | 80.0% | 10.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Funtion spending above | |||||||||||||
| ab | Functional Spending $s | $ 600,000 | $ 116,000 | $ 400,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 1,316,000 | $ 600,000 | 30.0% | Machining | $ 180,000 | |||
| Maint to prodn. | $ 600,000 | 50.0% | Assembly | $ 300,000 | |||||||||
| ac From Maint. To all Functions | $ 120,000 | $ 180,000 | $ 300,000 | $ 600,000 | + ab Maint. ad % | ||||||||
| ad | Subtotal: | $ 236,000 | $ 580,000 | $ 500,000 | $ 1,316,000 | ||||||||
| ae | Operating % of IT | 88.9% | 11.1% | 100.0% | af w/out Maint.% | $ 236,000 | $ 236,000 | ||||||
| af | From IT to Opera. Depts. | $ 209,778 | $ 26,222 | $ 236,000 | + af * ad IT | Prod. Only % | 88.9% | 11.1% | |||||
| From IT after alloc from M | $ 209,778 | $ 26,222 | |||||||||||
| ag | Total: | $ 789,778 | $ 526,222 | $ 1,316,000 | + af + ag | Machining | Assembly | ||||||
| 80%/90% | 10%/90% | ||||||||||||
| Reciprocal Method | |||||||||||||
| Function A: with reciprocal allocation of OH | Function A = Maintenance | ||||||||||||
| Function B = IT | |||||||||||||
| Function A with reciprocal allocation = | |||||||||||||
| Function A Spending + (Function A % usage of Function B X Function B Spending) | |||||||||||||
| Maintenance = | $600000 + (10% X IT) | ||||||||||||
| IT = | $116000 + (20% X Maintenance) | IT = ($116000 + (20% X Maintainance)) | |||||||||||
| Maintenance = | $600000 + 10% X ($116000 + (20% X Maintainance)) | ||||||||||||
| $600000 + 10% X $116000 + 10% X (20% X Maintenance) | |||||||||||||
| $600000 + $116000 + 2% X Maintanance | |||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $600000 + $11600 | ||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $600000 + $11600 | ||||||||||||
| 98% Maintenance = | $611,600 | ||||||||||||
| ah | 100% Maintenance = | $ 624,082 | |||||||||||
| IT = $116000 +20%*PM | |||||||||||||
| IT = $116000 +20%*$624082 | Reciprocal | Budget | Allocated | ||||||||||
| ai | IT = $116000 + $124816 | $ 624,082 | $ 600,000 | 499,265 | |||||||||
| IT = | $ 240,816 | $ 240,816 | $ 116,000 | 216,734 | |||||||||
| $ 864,898 | $ 716,000 | 716,000 | |||||||||||
| Machining + | |||||||||||||
| Assembly | |||||||||||||
| PM | IT | Machining | Assembly | Total: | |||||||||
| $ 624,082 | 187,224 | 312,041 | 499,265 | ah X ad | |||||||||
| 240,816 | 192,653 | 24,082 | 216,734 | ai X af | |||||||||
| Functional FOH→ | 400,000 | 200,000 | 600,000 | ab | |||||||||
| $ 779,877 | $ 536,122 | $ 1,316,000 | |||||||||||
| Comparison of Methods | Machining + | ||||||||||||
| Assembly | |||||||||||||
| Machining | Assembly | Total: | |||||||||||
| Direct Method of Overhead Allocation | 728,111 | 587,889 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||||
| Step Down Method of Overhead Allocation | 789,778 | 526,222 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||||
| Reciprocal Method | 779,877 | 536,122 | 1,316,000 | ||||||||||
| Incremental Cost Allocation | |||||||||||||
| Identify primary use | |||||||||||||
| Identify secondary use | |||||||||||||
| Aloocate primary amount of cost to primary use | |||||||||||||
| Allocate incrment over primary to secondary | |||||||||||||
| Value @ cost | Tons | ||||||||||||
| Extract Aluminum fro Ore | 12,000,000 | 24,000,000 | |||||||||||
| Gold is extracted as well | 1,200,000 | 0.0536 | |||||||||||
| Total cost to extract | 6,100,000 | ||||||||||||
| Withuot extracting Gold | 6,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Incremental cost assigned to gold | 100,000 |
80%
90%
Ch. 4 HW
| Ch. 4 | ||||
| Process costing | ||||
| Homework | ||||
| Conversion costs only | ||||
| Completed units going from Dept. W. to Finished Goods [FG] | ||||
| Department W: | ||||
| Data: | 1 | $ 5,600.00 | Beginning inventory $'s | |
| 2 | 60% | % complete of beginning inventory quantity | ||
| 3 | 400 | Beginning inventory quantity | ||
| 4 | $ 14,000.00 | Period conversion spending | ||
| 5 | 3,000 | quantity started in period | ||
| 6 | 500 | Ending quantity | ||
| 7 | 70% | % complete of ending inventory quantity | ||
| To do: | A | Compute weighted average beginning equivalent units, ending equivalent units, started & completed equivalent units & cost per unit | ||
| B | Compute weighted average ending conversion $s @ department W | |||
| C | Compute conversion $s to FG with weighted average | |||
| D | Prepare JE for Weighted average at period end | |||
| E | Compute FIFO beginning equivalent units, ending equivalent units, equivalent units started & completed, equivalent units for period & cost per unit | |||
| G | Compute FIFO ending conversion $s @ department W | |||
| H | Compute conversion $s to FG with FIFO | |||
| I | Prepare JE for FIFO at period end |
Conversion Costs Transferred OUT:
Weighted Average:
Beginnig Costs
5,575
Period Costs
350,900
Total
356,475
Equivalent units
4,900
per Equivalent Unit
72.75
$
Completed: To next Department or FG
4,800
349,200
Ending in Department
400 = 100 Eq.units
7,275
356,475
Data Set:
#3
Support DepartmentsOperating Departments
MaintenanceIT SupportMachiningAssemblyTotal:
abFunctional Spending $s600,000$ 116,000$ 400,000$ 200,000$ 1,316,000$
acUnits: Hours1,600 2,400 4,000 8,000
ad%20.0%30.0%50.0%100.0%
Without support functions37.5%62.5%
aeComputer Hours20016002002,000
af%10.0%80.0%10.0%100.0%
Without support functions88.9%11.1%
Data Set:
#4
Direct Method of Overhead Allocation
Allocate from Support direct to operating
agTotal Operating depts. Hours6,400 ac operating depts.
ahsupport cost-rate per hour
Maintenance
93.75$ + 'ab' Maint. / 'ac' opera. hours
aisupport cost-rate per hourAssembly64.44 + 'ab' IT. / 'ac' opera. hours
Allocated support costs
Maintenance
IT Support
ajMachining225,000 103,111 + ac opera * ah , ai
akAssembly375,000 12,889 + ac mach * ah , ai
alTotal600,000 116,000
Direct Fixed OH costs
Direct
AllocatedTotalRate
az+ab + ajMachining400,000 328,111 728,111 303.38$
ax+ab + akAssembly200,000 387,889 587,889 146.97$
aw+ az + axTotal600,000 716,000 1,316,000