Classroom mangement
Classroom Procedures
|
|
1 No submission 0.00% |
2 Insufficient 65.00% |
3 Approaching 75.00% |
4 Acceptable 85.00% |
5 Target 100.00% |
|
|
100.0 %Criteria |
|
|||||
|
40.0 %Procedures |
Not addressed. |
Procedures are overly simplistic and/or are unclear in describing student expectations and how each procedure would be taught to the class. |
Procedures are adequate for the identified class of students. They are simple but clear in describing student expectations and how each procedure would be taught to the class. |
Procedures are sound for the identified class of students. They are satisfactory in describing student expectations and how each procedure would be taught to the class. |
Procedures are well-developed, skillfully and thoroughly describing the student expectations and how each procedure would be taught to the identified class. They are well-suited for meeting the physical and developmental needs of students. |
|
|
100.0 %Criteria |
|
|||||
|
40.0 %Step-by-Step Process |
Not addressed. |
Step-by-step process does not demonstrate an understanding of the task or a strategy was not developed to teach and practice each procedure. |
Step-by-step process demonstrates an adequately understood and acceptable strategy was developed to teach and practice each procedure. |
Step-by-step process demonstrates that the task is soundly understood and a feasible strategy was developed to teach and practice each procedure. |
Step-by-step process demonstrates that task was analyzed and readily understood and an efficient and feasible strategy was developed to teach and practice each procedure. |
|
|
100.0 %Criteria |
|
|||||
|
10.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
|
|
100.0 %Criteria |
|
|||||
|
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
100 %Total Weightage |
|
|