Mid-Term
CJUS 702
Midterm Essay Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content (70%) |
Advanced 92-100% |
Proficient 84-91% |
Developing 1-83% |
Not present |
Total |
|
Content |
46 to 50 points: · The question is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper. · Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. · All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable. · Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. |
42 to 45.75 points: · The question may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper. · Introduction may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points. · Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed. · Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose. |
1 to 41.75 points: · The question requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper. · Introduction may be missing or ambiguous. · Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development. · Organization may require significant improvement. |
0 points Not present
|
|
|
Reasoned Analysis |
46 to 50 points: · Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning. · Objective, reasoned analysis is employed. · Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated. · The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used. |
42 to 45.75 points: · Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support. · Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation. · The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas. · Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required. |
1 to 41.75 points: · Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support. · Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed. · Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas. · Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required. |
0 points Not present
|
|
|
Scholarly Support |
20.75 to 22.5 points: Sources reflecting diverse viewpoints and research are employed to include at least 4 peer-reviewed scholarly resources (along with course materials/books). Source material is properly attributed. Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing. |
19 to 20.5 points: Some improvements/ additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed using at least 2 peer-reviewed scholarly resources (along with course materials/books). Clarification of source material may be needed. Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed. |
1 to 18.75 points: Significant improvement of scholarly support or Christian world view is needed. Source material may not be properly attributed. |
0 points Not present
|
|
|
Structure (30%) |
Advanced 92-100% |
Proficient 84-91% |
Developing 1-83% |
Not present |
Total |
|
Grammar & Spelling |
20.25 to 22 points: · Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed and spelling is correct. · Sentences are complete, clear and concise. · Rhetorical skill is shown. · Sentences are well constructed, with consistently strong and varied structure. · Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions are present and logical, directing flow of thought throughout the paper. |
18.5 to 20 points: · Paper contains minimal errors in grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. · Sentences are generally complete, clear and concise. · Rhetorical skill is shown, although a few points may require clarification. · Some variation in sentence structure or transitions may be required to improve flow of discussion. · Some paragraph transitions may require improvement. |
1 to 18.25 points: · Paper contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. · Multiple sentences may be incomplete or ambiguously worded. · Sentence transitions may be weak, insufficiently directing the flow of thought. |
0 points Not present
|
|
|
Formatting |
20.25 to 22 points: · Paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., section subheadings, table of contents, indices, appendices, etc.) as appropriate. · Text, citations and Reference page(s) follow current APA format requirements. · Paper is written in 12 point Times New Roman font, is double-spaced, and has 1” margins. |
18.5 to 20 points: · Paper is generally laid out effectively and uses some reader-friendly aids as appropriate. · Text, citations and Reference page(s) contains minimal inconsistencies with current APA format requirements. · Paper may contain some inconsistencies with required font, spacing and margin requirements. |
1 to 18.25 points: · Paper may be laid out ineffectively or may not use sufficient reader-friendly aids as appropriate. · Text, citations and/or Reference page(s) do not follow current APA format requirements. · Paper may not follow required font, spacing and margin requirements. |
0 points Not present
|
|
|
Page Length |
8 to 8.5 points: Required page length of 10 pages is met. This does not include title-page, abstract, nor reference page(s). |
7.25 to 7.75 points: Required page length was not met or exceeded required page length of 1 page. This does not include title-page, abstract, nor reference page(s). |
1 to 7 points: Page length may be significantly shorter or longer than the requirement by 2 or more pages. |
0 points Not present
|
|
|
Professor Comments: |
|
Total: |
/175 |