|
Points: 110
|
Case Study 2:Security Policy
|
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
|
1. Explain the purpose of a university security policy and indicate the major reasons why they are necessary. Provide your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.
Weight: 25%
|
Did not submit or incompletely explained the purpose of a university security policy and did not submit or incompletely indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Did not submit or incompletely provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.
|
Partially explained the purpose of a university security policy and partially indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Partially provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.
|
Satisfactorily explained the purpose of a university security policy and satisfactorily indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Satisfactorily provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.
|
Thoroughly explained the purpose of a university security policy and thoroughly indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Thoroughly provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.
|
|
2. Critique the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.
|
Partially critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.
|
Satisfactorily critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.
|
Thoroughly critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.
|
|
3. Critique the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.
|
Partially critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.
|
Satisfactorily critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.
|
Thoroughly critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.
|
|
4. Suggest one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Provide a rationale for your response.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.
|
Partially suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Partially provided a rationale for your response.
|
Satisfactorily suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.
|
Thoroughly suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
|
|
5. 3 references
Weight: 5%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
|
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
|
More than 6 errors present
|
5-6 errors present
|
3-4 errors present
|
0-2 errors present
|