Assignment !!

cezinha22
Chapter8PPT.ppt

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Strategies

PowerPoint presentation to accompany

Heizer and Render

Operations Management, Eleventh Edition

Principles of Operations Management, Ninth Edition

PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

8

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Outline

Global Company Profile:
FedEx

  • The Strategic Importance of Location
  • Factors That Affect Location Decisions
  • Methods of Evaluating Location Alternatives
  • Service Location Strategy
  • Geographic Information Systems

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Learning Objectives

When you complete this chapter you should be able to:

  • Identify and explain seven major factors that effect location decisions
  • Compute labor productivity
  • Apply the factor-rating method
  • Complete a locational break-even analysis graphically and mathematically

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

When you complete this chapter you should be able to:

Learning Objectives

  • Use the center-of-gravity method
  • Understand the differences between service- and industrial-sector location analysis

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Provides Competitive Advantage for FedEx

  • Central hub concept
  • Enables service to more locations with fewer aircraft
  • Enables matching of aircraft flights with package loads
  • Reduces mishandling and delay in transit because there is total control of packages from pickup to delivery

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Strategic Importance of Location

  • One of the most important decisions a firm makes
  • Increasingly global in nature
  • Significant impact on fixed and variable costs
  • Decisions made relatively infrequently

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Strategic Importance of Location

  • Long-term decisions
  • Once committed to a location, many resource and cost issues are difficult to change

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Strategic Importance of Location

The objective of location strategy is to maximize the benefit of location to the firm

Options include

  • Expanding existing facilities
  • Maintain existing and add sites
  • Closing existing and relocating

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location and Costs

  • Location decisions based on low cost require careful consideration
  • Once in place, location-related costs are fixed in place and difficult to reduce
  • Determining optimal facility location is a good investment

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect Location Decisions

  • Globalization adds to complexity
  • Market economics
  • Communication
  • Rapid, reliable transportation
  • Ease of capital flow
  • Differing labor costs
  • Identify key success factors (KSFs)

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Decisions

Country Decision

Key Success Factors

  • Political risks, government rules, attitudes, incentives
  • Cultural and economic issues
  • Location of markets
  • Labor talent, attitudes, productivity, costs
  • Availability of supplies, communications, energy
  • Exchange rates and currency risks

Figure 8.1

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Decisions

Region/ Community Decision

Key Success Factors

  • Corporate desires
  • Attractiveness of region
  • Labor availability and costs
  • Costs and availability of utilities
  • Environmental regulations
  • Government incentives and fiscal policies
  • Proximity to raw materials and customers
  • Land/construction costs

Figure 8.1

MN

WI

MI

IL

IN

OH

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Decisions

Site Decision

Key Success Factors

  • Site size and cost
  • Air, rail, highway, and waterway systems
  • Zoning restrictions
  • Proximity of services/ supplies needed
  • Environmental impact issues

Figure 8.1

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Global Competitiveness Index of Countries

TABLE 8.1
Competitiveness of 142 Selected Countries
COUNTRY 2011-2012 RANKING
Switzerland 1
Singapore 2
Sweden 3
Finland 4
USA 5
Japan 9
UK 10
Canada 12
Israel 22
China 26
Mexico 58
Vietnam 65
Russia 66
Haiti 141
Chad 142

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect
Location Decisions

  • Labor productivity
  • Wage rates are not the only cost
  • Lower productivity may increase total cost

Labor cost per day

Productivity (units per day)

= Cost per unit

= $1.17 per unit

$70

60 units

South Carolina

= $1.25 per unit

$25

20 units

Mexico

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect
Location Decisions

  • Exchange rates and currency risks
  • Can have a significant impact on costs
  • Rates change over time
  • Costs
  • Tangible - easily measured costs such as utilities, labor, materials, taxes
  • Intangible - less easy to quantify and include education, public transportation, community, quality-of-life

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect
Location Decisions

  • Exchange rates and currency risks
  • Can have a significant impact on costs
  • Rates change over time
  • Costs
  • Tangible - easily measured costs such as utilities, labor, materials, taxes
  • Intangible - less easy to quantify and include education, public transportation, community, quality-of-life

Location decisions based on costs alone can create difficult ethical situations

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect
Location Decisions

  • Political risk, values, and culture
  • National, state, local governments attitudes toward private and intellectual property, zoning, pollution, employment stability may be in flux
  • Worker attitudes towards turnover, unions, absenteeism
  • Globally cultures have different attitudes towards punctuality, legal, and ethical issues

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Ranking Corruption

Rank Country 2012 CPI Score (out of 100)

1 Demark, Finland, New Zealand 90

4 Sweden 88

5 Singapore 87

6 Switzerland 86

7 Australia, Norway 85

9 Canada, Netherlands 84

13 Germany 79

14 Hong Kong 77

17 Japan, UK 74

19 USA 73

37 Taiwan 61

39 Israel 60

45 South Korea 56

80 China 39

123 Vietnam 31

133 Russia 28

Least Corrupt

Most Corrupt

*

*

CPI is the Corrupt Perceptions Index calculated by Transparency International, an organization dedicated to fighting business corruption. The Index is calculated from up to 13 different individual scores. For details and the methodology, see www.transparency.org.

In 2012 they changed their scoring system from “out of 10” to “out of 100”.

In case students are interested, three countries tied for the lowest score in the 2012 survey with a score of 8 out of 100 – Afghanistan, North Korea, and Somalia.

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect
Location Decisions

  • Proximity to markets
  • Very important to services
  • JIT systems or high transportation costs may make it important to manufacturers
  • Proximity to suppliers
  • Perishable goods, high transportation costs, bulky products

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factors That Affect
Location Decisions

  • Proximity to competitors (clustering)
  • Often driven by resources such as natural, information, capital, talent
  • Found in both manufacturing and service industries

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Clustering of Companies

TABLE 8.3 Clustering of Companies
INDUSTRY LOCATIONS REASON FOR CLUSTERING
Wine making Napa Valley (US) Bordeaux region (France) Natural resources of land and climate
Software firms Silicon Valley, Boston, Bangalore (India) Talent resources of bright graduates in scientific/technical areas, venture capitalists nearby
Clean energy Colorado Critical mass of talent and information, with 1,000 companies

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Clustering of Companies

TABLE 8.3 Clustering of Companies
INDUSTRY LOCATIONS REASON FOR CLUSTERING
Theme parks (Disney World, Universal Studios, and Sea World) Orlando, Florida A hot spot for entertainment, warm weather, tourists, and inexpensive labor
Electronics firms Northern Mexico NAFTA, duty free export to U.S.
Computer hardware manufacturers Singapore, Taiwan High technological penetration rate and per capita GDP, skilled/educated workforce with large pool of engineers

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Clustering of Companies

TABLE 8.3 Clustering of Companies
INDUSTRY LOCATIONS REASON FOR CLUSTERING
Fast food chains (Wendy’s, McDonald’s, Burger King, and Pizza Hut) Sites within 1 mile of each other Stimulate food sales, high traffic flows
General aviation aircraft (Cessna, Learjet, Boeing, Raytheon) Wichita, Kansas Mass of aviation skills
Athletic footwear, outdoor wear Portland, Oregon 300 companies, many owned by Nike, deep talent pool and outdoor culture

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factor-Rating Method

  • Popular because a wide variety of factors can be included in the analysis
  • Six steps in the method
  • Develop a list of relevant factors called key success factors
  • Assign a weight to each factor
  • Develop a scale for each factor
  • Score each location for each factor
  • Multiply score by weights for each factor for each location
  • Make a recommendation based on the highest point score

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Factor-Rating Example

TABLE 8.4 Weights, Scores, and Solution
SCORES (OUT OF 100) WEIGHTED SCORES
KSF WEIGHT FRANCE DENMARK FRANCE DENMARK
Labor availability and attitude .25 70 60 (.25)(70) = 17.5 (.25)(60) = 15.0
People-to-car ratio .05 50 60 (.05)(50) = 2.5 (.05)(60) = 3.0
Per capita income .10 85 80 (.10)(85) = 8.5 (.10)(80) = 8.0
Tax structure .39 75 70 (.39)(75) = 29.3 (.39)(70) = 27.3
Education and health .21 60 70 (.21)(60) = 12.6 (.21)(70) = 14.7
Totals 1.00 70.4 68.0

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Locational
Cost-Volume Analysis

  • An economic comparison of location alternatives
  • Three steps in the method
  • Determine fixed and variable costs for each location
  • Plot the cost for each location
  • Select location with lowest total cost for expected production volume

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Locational Cost-Volume Analysis Example

Three locations:

Total Cost = Fixed Cost + (Variable Cost x Volume)

Selling price = $120

Expected volume = 2,000 units

Athens $30,000 $75 $180,000

Brussels $60,000 $45 $150,000

Lisbon $110,000 $25 $160,000

Fixed Variable Total

City Cost Cost Cost

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Locational Cost-Volume Analysis Example

Crossover point – Athens/Brussels

30,000 + 75(x) = 60,000 + 45(x)

30(x) = 30,000

(x) = 1,000

60,000 + 45(x) = 110,000 + 25(x)

20(x) = 50,000

(x) = 2,500

Crossover point – Brussels/Lisbon

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Locational Cost-Volume Analysis Example

Figure 8.2

$180,000 –

$160,000 –

$150,000 –

$130,000 –

$110,000 –

$80,000 –

$60,000 –

$30,000 –

$10,000 –

Annual cost

| | | | | | |

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Volume

Athens lowest cost

Brussels

lowest cost

Lisbon lowest

cost

Lisbon cost curve

Athens

cost curve

Brussels

cost curve

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

  • Finds location of distribution center that minimizes distribution costs
  • Considers
  • Location of markets
  • Volume of goods shipped to those markets
  • Shipping cost (or distance)

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

  • Place existing locations on a coordinate grid
  • Grid origin and scale is arbitrary
  • Maintain relative distances
  • Calculate x and y coordinates for ‘center of gravity’
  • Assumes cost is directly proportional to distance and volume shipped

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

where dix = x-coordinate of location i

diy = y-coordinate of location i

Qi = Quantity of goods moved to or from location i

x-coordinate of the center of gravity

y-coordinate of the center of gravity

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

TABLE 8.5 Demand for Quain’s Discount Department Stores
STORE LOCATION NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SHIPPED PER MONTH
Chicago 2,000
Pittsburgh 1,000
New York 1,000
Atlanta 2,000

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

Figure 8.3

d1x = 30

d1y = 120

Q1 = 2,000

North-South

East-West

120 –

90 –

60 –

30 –

| | | | | |

30 60 90 120 150

Arbitrary origin

New York (130, 130)

Pittsburgh (90, 110)

Chicago (30, 120)

Atlanta (60, 40)

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

(30)(2000) + (90)(1000) + (130)(1000) + (60)(2000)

2000 + 1000 + 1000 + 2000

x-coordinate =

= 66.7

y-coordinate =

(120)(2000) + (110)(1000) + (130)(1000) + (40)(2000)

2000 + 1000 + 1000 + 2000

= 93.3

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Center-of-Gravity Method

Figure 8.3

North-South

East-West

120 –

90 –

60 –

30 –

| | | | | |

30 60 90 120 150

Arbitrary origin

New York (130, 130)

Pittsburgh (90, 110)

Chicago (30, 120)

Atlanta (60, 40)

Center of gravity (66.7, 93.3)

+

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Transportation Model

  • Finds amount to be shipped from several points of supply to several points of demand
  • Solution will minimize total production and shipping costs
  • A special class of linear programming problems

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Worldwide Distribution of Volkswagens and Parts

Figure 8.4

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Service Location Strategy

Purchasing power of customer-drawing area

Service and image compatibility with demographics of the customer-drawing area

Competition in the area

Quality of the competition

Uniqueness of the firm’s and competitors’ locations

Physical qualities of facilities and neighboring businesses

Operating policies of the firm

Quality of management

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Strategies

TABLE 8.6 Location Strategies – Service vs. Goods-Producing Organizations
SERVICE/RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL GOODS-PRODUCING
REVENUE FOCUS COST FOCUS
Volume/revenue Drawing area; purchasing power Competition; advertising/pricing Physical quality Parking/access; security/lighting; appearance/ image Cost determinants Rent Management caliber Operation policies (hours, wage rates) Tangible costs Transportation cost of raw material Shipment cost of finished goods Energy and utility cost; labor; raw material; taxes, and so on Intangible and future costs Attitude toward union Quality of life Education expenditures by state Quality of state and local government

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Location Strategies

TABLE 8.6 Location Strategies – Service vs. Goods-Producing Organizations
SERVICE/RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL GOODS-PRODUCING
TECHNIQUES TECHNIQUES
Regression models to determine importance of various factors Factor-rating method Traffic counts Demographic analysis of drawing area Purchasing power analysis of area Center-of-gravity method Geographic information systems Transportation method Factor-rating method Locational cost–volume analysis Crossover charts
ASSUMPTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Location is a major determinant of revenue High customer-contact issues are critical Costs are relatively constant for a given area; therefore, the revenue function is critical Location is a major determinant of cost Most major costs can be identified explicitly for each site Low customer contact allows focus on the identifiable costs Intangible costs can be evaluated

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

How Hotel Chains Select Sites

  • Location is a strategically important decision in the hospitality industry
  • La Quinta started with 35 independent variables and worked to refine a regression model to predict profitability
  • The final model had only four variables
  • Price of the inn
  • Median income levels
  • State population per inn
  • Location of nearby colleges

r2 = .51

51% of the

profitability is

predicted by

just these

four variables!

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

  • Important tool to help in location analysis
  • Enables more complex demographic analysis
  • Available data bases include
  • Detailed census data
  • Detailed maps
  • Utilities
  • Geographic features
  • Locations of major services

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

*

8 - *

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Printed in the United States of America.

= dixQi

i ∑

Qi i ∑

=

d

ix

Q

i

i

å

Q

i

i

å

= diyQi

i ∑

Qi i ∑

=

d

iy

Q

i

i

å

Q

i

i

å