TEAM LEAD group discussions & self-assessment of Leadership Skills

Home_work2019
Chapter5-ContingencyTheoriesCG13.pptx

Behavioral

Contingency

Trait

Integrative

The 4 Leadership Theory Classifications Include:

1

This slide relates to XX-XX.

Summary Overview

XXXX

Major Title

Heading.

Chapter 5 Contingency Theory of Leadership

Behaviour Leadership Theories…

Gave us the idea that there are TWO leadership behaviour concepts. ALL leadership styles are based on these two concepts:

Leaders draw on:

Task Behaviour (Job, Structure, Production)

Relationship Behaviour (People, Democratic, Consideration)

3

Contingency Leadership Theories

Attempt to explain the appropriate leadership style based on the leader, followers, and situation. In other words, the appropriate style of leadership

DEPENDS….

4

Framework for Contingency Leadership Variables

5

CONTINGENCY

LEADERSHIP

VARIABLES

FOLLOWERS

Capabilities

Motivation

LEADER

Personality traits

Behavior

Experience

SITUATION

Task

Structure

Environment

The Leader Variables

Impacted by the Leader’s

Personality

Behavioral preferred style

Experience

Expectations

Values

Background

Knowledge

Feeling of security

Confidence in subordinates

6

The Follower Variables

Followers’ preferred style for the leader is based on

Personality

Behavior

Willingness to participate

Ability/Experience

Locus of Control

Confidence

7

The Situation Variables

Is impacted by environmental considerations

Organization size

Organization structure

Organization climate

Organization goals

Organization technology

Upper-level managers

8

Contingency Leadership Model

Used to determine if one’s style is task- or relationship-oriented, and if the situation matches the leader’s style to maximize performance

In your discussion groups:

1. complete assessment

2. discuss your dominate style?

9

Path-Goal Theory

Evans and House suggest that the performance, satisfaction and motivation of a group can be affected by the leader in a number of ways:

Removing Performance Obstacles.

Clarifying paths towards goals.

Offering rewards for the achievement of these goals.

http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~gerard/MENG/ME96/Documents/Styles/conti.html#Topic3

Path-Goal Leadership Model

Employee

Variables

Situational

Variables

Leader

Behaviours

Directive

Supportive

Participative

Achievement-oriented

Leader

Effectiveness

Employee motivation

Employee satisfaction

Leader acceptance

11

A person may do these by adopting a certain leadership style, according to the situation:

Directive leadership - Specific advice is given to the group and ground rules are established.

Supportive leadership - Good relations exist with the group and sensitivity to subordinates' needs is shown.

Participative leadership - Decision making is based on group consultation and information is shared with the group.

Achievement-oriented leadership - Challenging goals are set and high performance is encouraged while showing confidence in the groups' ability

E-to-P

Expectancy

P-to-O

Expectancy

Outcomes & Valences

Outcome 1

+ or -

Effort

Performance

Outcome 3

+ or -

Outcome 2

+ or -

Expectancy Theory of Motivation

13

Situational Leadership

Task behaviour

Relationship

behaviour

Telling

Selling

Participating

Delegating

Match leadership style

with follower needs

LOW

HIGH

HIGH

Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model

Source: Reprinted with permission from the Center for Leadership Studies. Situational Leadership® is a registered trademark of the Center for Leadership Studies. Escondido, California. All rights reserved.

S3

S2

S4

S1

STYLE OF LEADER

Task Behaviour

High

Low

High

High relationship

and low task

High task and

high relationship

Low relationship

and low task

Moderate

Follower Readiness

Low

High

Able

and

willing

Able

and

unwilling

Unable

and

willing

Unable

and

unwilling

R4

R3

R2

R1

High task and

low relationship

15

(notes cont’d from slide 17)

3. SLT uses the same two leadership dimensions that Fiedler identified: task and relationship behaviour.

4. The two leadership dimensions are considered as either high or low and then combined into four specific leadership styles, as shown in Exhibit 8.6 on page 230.

5. Research efforts to test and support the theory generally have been disappointing, possibly because of internal ambiguities or inconsistencies in the model itself.

Be Prepared to Lead Video

Task behaviour

Relationship

behaviour

Direction

Influence

Collaboration

Delegation

Match leadership style

with follower needs

LOW

HIGH

HIGH

The Great Debate….

Situational Leadership is the best approach for leadership in the 21st century

The Expectancy Theory of Motivation is the best approach for leadership in the 21st century

Homework

Update your Reflections Journal

Read Chapter 9

Read article on Servant Leadership – discuss the essence of this approach to leadership online.

Team Leads for July 18 to facilitate this process

Sign up for Leader Essay – groups of four today

If you were on a debate team – complete your reflection and submit to D2L