Discussion 2

styrdestiny24-
Chapter4Sociology.pdf

Page 1

Social Class,

Inequality, &

Poverty

Peter Kaufman, State University of New York at New

Paltz Todd Schoepflin, Niagara University

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 2

Social Class, Inequality, &

Poverty

P E T E R K A U F M A N , S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y O F N E W Y O R K A T N E W

P A L T Z T O D D S C H O E P F L I N , N I A G A R A U N I V E R S I T Y

INTRODUCTION

SOCIAL CLASS

The social class structure of the United States

Is social class ascribed or achieved?

Social mobility

INEQUALITY

The growing gap between the poor and the rich

U.S. inequality in global context

POVERTY

What is poverty?

Characteristics of the poor

The working poor and the jobless poor

Homelessness

The importance of affordable housing

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 3

INTRODUCTION

 Why do sociologists study social class inequality?

I was raised in a poor household. My mom is a Hispanic single mother on welfare who

lacks formal education. My father was an Italian immigrant who died of alcoholism. I grew up

with my mom’s side of the family. Among most of my family tobacco and alcohol use were

prominent. Marijuana and cocaine were also used frequently. The most successful thing I ever

witnessed anyone in my family do was join the army or graduate high school. Working was

hardly the trend in my family. My diet consisted of mostly unhealthy foods: fried meats, sauces

loaded with salt, pork fat, greasy snacks, lots of soda, and microwaveable food items. If I saw

anything green on my plate I thought, “eww disgusting” and I wouldn’t touch it. Not

surprisingly, I was overweight for much of my childhood and adolescence. And with all of the

second-hand smoke I breathed in I also developed asthma.

When I was 18, my mother kicked me out of the house and I moved in with the family of

a rich, white, friend of mine. This family had a different position in life on so many levels. They

had different interests, concerns, and ways of doing things. It all seemed so foreign to me. For

example, they were very health conscious. They had foods and products in their home that I

had never seen or heard of before. The parents even took time to exercise daily. And they

had lots of books in the home which they actually read. Although the way they lived seemed

strange to me I also knew that the lifestyle of this family allowed them to have many more

possibilities than I could ever imagine in my upbringing.

This excerpt comes from an essay written by Alejandro (Alex) Russo, a student in one of

our sociology classes.1 This brief autobiographical sketch captures many of the themes that we

discuss in this chapter. It also offers a snapshot of how social class has a significant impact on

our lives. As Alex suggests, social class influences our goals and aspirations, our potential and

possibilities, our lifestyle choices and habits, and even our health and well-being.

Despite its significance, social class often goes unacknowledged. We often don’t

recognize the effects of social class until we interact with people who have different

economic resources—much like Alex didn’t recognize the influence social class had on his life

until he moved in with his wealthy friend. In this sense, social class is invisible in plain sight. Unlike

characteristics such as race and gender, which are more obvious and easier to see and

define, we can’t always figure out someone’s social class just by looking at them. But if we are

seeing the world sociologically, indicators of social class quickly come into focus.

Some of us, like Alex, grow up in poverty while others grow up in affluent families who

may use their power and influence to ensure their children get into elite colleges (more on the

“Operation Varsity Blues” college admission scandal later).

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 4

Some students attend rat- and cockroach-infested schools with outdated and

insufficient textbooks, while others attend schools with state-of-the-art facilities and computers

for every student.

Some adults work three jobs and over 80 hours a week just to support their families while

others enjoy paid vacations, health insurance, and employer contributions to a retirement

account.

And some of us live in cities like Flint, Michigan, while others live in cities like Bloomfield

Hills, Michigan. Although these two communities are separated by only 45 miles, the life

experiences of the people who live there are worlds apart. In Flint, the median household

income is $28,834, the unemployment rate is nearly twice the national average, 40% of

residents live in poverty, and the city is infamous for its lead-contaminated drinking water, its

abandoned and boarded-up homes, and its rising homicide rate.2 In contrast, Bloomfield Hills

is one of the richest cities in America. The median household income is $182,243, the value of

most homes is close to $1 million, and the community is known for its quiet, rural residential

properties, its exclusive country clubs, and its world-renowned educational institutions.

In this chapter we take a journey through the landscape of social class. We meet other

individuals and consider how their lives have been shaped and guided by their social class

position. Some individuals are greatly supported and enabled by their social class position

while others, like Alex, face many obstacles and constraints. Before examining how social class

contributes to some of these inequalities, we begin with a solid understanding of what exactly

we mean when we use the term social class.

SOCIAL CLASS

 How do sociologists make sense of social class?

 What is the social class structure of the United States?

 Are we assigned a social class at birth or is it something we accomplish?

 Is the American Dream alive and well or is it just a myth?

Consider these films: Pretty Woman, Boyz n the Hood, 8 Mile, Titanic, Dreamgirls, Pursuit

of Happyness, Annie, Slumdog Millionaire, The Hunger Games, Snowpiercer, The Great Gatsby,

The Wolf of Wall Street, Crazy Rich Asians, Hustlers, and Parasite. They all have one thing in

common: they revolve around social class.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 5

Social class is one of the central concepts in sociology. As you learned in the first

chapter, sociology emerged when scholars began investigating the economic inequality they

witnessed, particularly during the late 1800s and early 1900s. Karl Marx was an early sociologist,

and one of his central concerns was no different than what many sociologists still study today:

the growing economic gap between the haves and the have-nots.

Social class is just one form of stratification, a system that puts categories of people into

a hierarchy. All societies have stratification systems, but they vary in what categories are used

to sort people and how unequal those categories of people are. Religion, gender, wealth,

and race are common foundations for stratification, leading to unequal access to resources,

political rights, and other benefits. In other chapters, you’ll learn how the U.S. is stratified

according to race, ethnicity, and gender. In this chapter, we’re focusing on economic

stratification, and we analyze social class inequality in the U.S. as a structural problem, not as

something that results from personal failing.

A social class is generally defined as a group of individuals who share a similar

economic position based on income, wealth, education, and occupation. When referring to

social class, most people rely on a simple system consisting of the upper, middle, and lower (or

working) classes. This model is quick and convenient; however, as we will see, social class is

much more complicated than this.

Most definitions of social class are based on income, the total amount of money

someone earns each year. Income is a convenient indicator of social class, and it’s commonly

used to identify a person’s class standing.

Another common indicator of social

class is wealth—the total amount of money

that a person has or could have if she sold

off all her assets. If you take all the money in

someone’s bank and retirement accounts,

and add the value of everything they own—

cars, perhaps a home, property, anything

they have invested in the stock market, and

anything else that they could sell—the

resulting total amount is their wealth.

Although there is often a strong connection

between income and wealth (that is, people

who earn high salaries also often own a lot of

wealth), this is not always the case. You could have wealth from sources such as savings,

investments, real estate, and inheritance, even if you don’t earn a high income, or any

income at all.

Factory workers, a typical working-class job.

(Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 6

The amount of money we make or have is not the only factor that may determine our

social class. Education and occupation are also often included in the mix. Both

characteristics—how far we went in school and what kind of job we have—are linked with

income and with each other.

The social class structure of the United States

Over 30 years ago, an undergraduate student at Harvard University walked into a

public housing project outside of Boston and began research for his senior thesis. Little did he

know that he was laying the groundwork for what was to become one of the most well-known

sociological studies of social class in the United States. Jay MacLeod’s Ain’t No Makin’ It is a

story of two groups of teenagers who lived in the housing project: The Brothers, a

predominantly Black peer group, and the Hallway Hangers, who were predominantly White.3

MacLeod followed the Brothers and the Hallway Hangers from their teenage years into

young adulthood and then into middle age. He documents their dreams, aspirations,

successes, and failures. Ain't No Makin’ It demonstrates that social class can be a complicated

concept to understand. It’s often ignored and unacknowledged. Even though it had a

significant impact on the life choices and chances of the Brothers and Hallway Hangers, social

class was not part of their vocabulary. This is true for the majority of Americans today: Most of

us don’t speak about social class regularly. In the rare instances when we do talk about social

class or are asked to identify our own social class position, Americans almost always say we

are middle class.4

If we want to understand the important impact that social class has on our lives, we

can’t rely on the simplistic model of lower, middle, and upper classes. We need to account for

multiple factors such as income, wealth, education, and occupation. We use Dennis Gilbert’s

model of the class structure that relies primarily on income, occupation, and education.5

Although Gilbert does not factor in wealth, since it is often difficult to measure, we can see

how wealth is connected to these other three factors and how it might influence our social

class standing.

Gilbert’s model includes six social classes that are situated within three broad

categories. At the top is the first category, the privileged classes, made up of what he calls

the capitalist class and the upper-middle class.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 7

The capitalist class (commonly known as the

top 1%) makes money from the things they own:

businesses, real estate, stocks, and bonds.

Although the 1% may work, they usually do not

gain their tremendous wealth from their annual

salary. Instead, they are part of the super-rich

because the things they own (their wealth) bring

them a continual stream of lucrative profits.

The second group in the privileged class

category is the upper-middle class. Making up

about 14% of the population, these well-educated

individuals rely on their high incomes from jobs to catapult them into this category. Typical jobs

among this group include business managers, doctors, lawyers, accountants, and some small

business owners. Gilbert includes a sub-category at the top of the upper-middle class called

the working rich. Although relatively small in size, this group includes individuals whose annual

incomes are well into the six-figure range. One of the main features that distinguishes this

group from the capitalist class is that the working rich rely on their salaries to maintain their

class position.

The second category in Gilbert’s social-class model is called the majority classes. Here

we have about 60% of the population, evenly split between the middle class and the working

class. People in the middle class are likely to have a high school diploma and some college

experience (an increasing number even have a bachelor’s degree). They work as teachers,

nurses, master craftspeople (plumbers, electricians, carpenters), and lower-level managers.

Just below them is the working class. These individuals have probably completed high school

or a trade school; they typically work as office support (secretaries and administrative

assistants), retail sales workers, factory workers, or low-paid craftspeople.

As you consider the distinctions between the middle class and the working class, you

may be thinking of examples of people you know who don’t quite fit into this model. That’s not

surprising. As Gilbert points out, the distinction between the middle class and the working class

can be fuzzy. You may know someone who has only a high school education but works in an

occupation and earns a yearly salary that puts them in the middle class. On the other hand,

some people may have a higher level of education (such as a college degree) but work in

jobs that place them in the working class, either by choice or because they can’t find a better

job. Determining social class is not an exact science. Instead of relying on just one or two

factors such as income or education, we need to consider the interplay between these

factors.

The third and final category in Gilbert’s model is the lower classes. Making up about

one-quarter of the U. S. population, this group includes the working poor (15%) and the

Eye surgeon, an example of an

upper-middle-class job. (Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 8

underclass (10%). Both have some education, but most do not have more than a high school

diploma.

The working poor are typically employed in insecure and low-wage jobs such as

janitorial and cleaning services, manual labor, landscaping, restaurant support (fast food, wait

staff, line cooks), and other service industries. Because the jobs held by the working poor do

not generally provide much in the way of benefits (such as medical, dental, or vision care;

paid vacations; retirement accounts), the working poor are more likely than social classes

above them to face financial insecurity and instability. Many workers in these jobs also

encounter unpredictable and inflexible work schedules, putting them in stressful and

precarious situations since their income may vary from week to week.

Author Barbara Ehrenreich tried to survive

on these types of low-wage jobs in order to

understand the daily struggles of the working poor,

an experience described in her book Nickel and

Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. She

worked as a diner waitress, motel maid,

housecleaner, and Walmart salesperson and

found it nearly impossible to cover the cost of rent,

gas, and meals. Benefits that the middle and

upper classes may take for granted, such as paid

sick leave, didn’t exist at these jobs; when

Ehrenreich was sick, she had to go to work anyway

because she couldn’t afford to lose a day’s wages. As she pointed out, long days on the job,

sometimes followed by a shift at a second job just to make ends meet, leave low-wage

workers with little energy or spare time to look for better jobs or to attend college.

Going to work sick can even lead to death, as was the case for Augustín Rodriguez, a

longtime employee at a Smithfield Foods meatpacking plant in South Dakota. His death was

tied to a COVID-19 outbreak at the facility, which offered a $500 bonus to workers who didn’t

miss any shifts during the month of April, 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.6

Fast-food workers on strike for higher pay.

(Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 9

Table 1: Gilbert’s Model of the Social-Class Structure in the United States7

Class, % of Households

Source of Income,

Occupation of Main

Earner

Typical Education

Typical Household

Income, 2012

Privileged Classes

Capitalists, 1% Investors, executives,

heirs

Selective college or

university, often

graduate or

professional school

$1 million

Upper middle, 14% Upper management

and professionals,

successful small

business owners,

including the working

rich

College, often

graduate or

professional study

$150,000

(working rich:

$500,000)

Majority Classes

Middle, 30% Lower-level

managers,

semiprofessionals,

nonretail sales

workers, craftsmen

At least high school,

often some college

$70,000

Working, 30% Machine operators,

low- paid craftsmen,

clerical workers, retail

sales workers

High school $40,000

Lower Classes

Working poor, 15% Most service workers,

laborers, low-paid

machine operators,

and clerical workers

At least some high

school

$25,000

Underclass, 10% Unemployed or part-

time work; many

depend on public

assistance and other

government programs

Some high school $15,000

At the bottom of Gilbert’s model is the underclass. They may be part-time workers,

unemployed, or may have inconsistent and unreliable work opportunities (such as seasonal

work that is only available for part of the year). Many rely on public assistance benefits, which

have been shrinking over the past twenty years. Although their financial insecurity forces this

group to rely on public assistance to help pay for food, shelter, and clothing, they actually

receive less in government benefits than the majority and privileged classes.8 While the lower

classes may receive limited benefits in the way of food, housing, and tax subsidies, the

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 10

wealthier classes gain significantly more valuable benefits through government policies that

allow them to drastically lower the amount they owe in taxes. The ability to write off expenses

such as part of their mortgage interest payments (which is most valuable for those with the

most expensive homes), deposits into retirement accounts (which low-income workers are

often unable to afford), and profits from certain types of stock trading or capital gains are all

tax benefits provided to more privileged Americans.

Is social class ascribed or achieved?

As you think about the descriptions and characteristics of the various social classes, you

are probably locating yourself somewhere in Gilbert’s model. You may even realize that

you’re in a different social class than the one you thought you were in. Maybe you grew up

assuming you were in the middle class (as many people do), but according to Gilbert you fit

into a different category. As you ponder where you fall on this social class spectrum, you might

also consider how you actually ended up in that particular social class location. Did you use

your own income, education, and occupation or did you use your parents’? Did you receive

your social class through birth or is it something you accomplished through your own efforts?

These questions reflect an important

distinction discussed in the Social Structure and

the Individual chapter: the difference between

ascribed and achieved statuses. As you’ll recall,

an ascribed status is one you acquired when you

were born or that you take on involuntarily later

in life. In contrast, you gain an achieved status at

least in part through your achievements, abilities,

or efforts.

When you were born, you automatically

entered into the social class of your parents or

guardians. You did not get to choose if you were born into the capitalist class or the working

poor. But the social class ascribed to us at birth is not necessarily the social class we have

when we become adults. For example, nearly 30% of students entering four-year colleges and

more than 50% of students who enter two-year colleges are first-generation students—neither

of their parents completed college.9 Most of these students are probably in college because

they view education as a way to achieve a higher-paying job and a higher social class than

their parents.

The distinction between ascribed and achieved social class status is particularly

relevant when we try to understand social inequality. There is a long-standing assumption,

particularly in the United States, that social class is largely an achieved status. Most people

believe that your position in the social class structure depends mostly on your own individual

Children born into poverty. (Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 11

efforts: are you motivated, do you work hard, do you make smart financial decisions, and are

you willing to go the extra mile?

But the idea that our social class standing is based on our own merit is not altogether

accurate. Consider the demographics of the CEOs of the Fortune 500—a list of the 500 largest

and most profitable companies in the U.S. In 2021, this list contained only 41 women CEOs

(8.2%) and just 4 African American CEOs (0.8%). And 2021 is the first year two Black women

have been Fortune 500 CEOs at the same time.10 Given that women make up nearly 51% of

the U.S. population and African Americans comprise a little over 13%, we might ask why CEOs

of Fortune 500 companies are overwhelmingly White men. Are women and African Americans

just not working hard enough or not motivated enough to lead the biggest companies in

America? Or is something about their race and gender (both ascribed characteristics) holding

them back from making it to the top?

Table 2: SAT Scores and Family Income

Family Income

Critical Reading

Mathematics

Writing

$0-$20,000 435 462 429

$20,000-40,000 465 482 455

$40,000-60,000 487 500 474

$60,000-80,000 500 511 486

$80,000-100,000 512 524 499

$100,000-120,000 522 536 511

$120,000-140,000 526 540 515

$140,000-160,000 533 548 523

$160,000-200,000 539 555 531

More than $200,000 563 565 586

Source: College Board11

Another example might hit closer to home. You may have taken the SAT, ACT, or

another standardized test at some point. Did you know that the best way to predict a

student’s performance on these college entrance exams is to measure their family income? As

Table 2 shows, if you want to do well on the SAT, your best strategy is to be born into a wealthy

family.

One reason for this relationship between social class and educational achievement is

that parents with higher incomes have more resources to help their children succeed

academically. As Annette Lareau demonstrates in her book, Home Advantage, although

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 12

parents from all social classes have similar aspirations for their children, those with greater

financial means can significantly boost their kids’ learning by stocking their house with lots of

books to read, sending their children to higher-quality daycares and schools, and paying for

tutors and test preparation courses, which parents with lower incomes often can’t afford.12

And as we will see in the next section, such advantages (or disadvantages) help explain why

many people reproduce their ascribed social class position.

Social mobility

“Don’t let somebody ever tell you, you can’t do

something. If you want something, go get it. Period.”

These lines are from the movie The Pursuit of

Happyness, based on the life of Chris Gardner.

Gardner went from being homeless to working in the

finance industry and later became an inspirational

speaker. In moving from a life of poverty to an

achieved social class of wealth and comfort, Chris

Gardner’s story exemplifies the rags-to-riches narrative

of the American Dream.

The American Dream is a strongly-held and

much-cherished belief in the United States. We are told

that with hard work, determination, and a “can do” spirit, it’s possible to be born into a

working poor or even an underclass family and eventually make it into the more privileged

classes. The American Dream suggests that an ascribed social class should not hold you back

from becoming who or what you want to be. As long as you work hard, have a good attitude,

and don’t give up, you can live your dreams.

When people like Chris Gardner move from an ascribed social class position to a new

achieved social class position, they have experienced social mobility. Upward mobility, which

is most often discussed in the context of the American Dream, occurs when someone moves

from a lower social class position to a higher one. This form of mobility is obviously the one most

of us would prefer.

But we can also experience downward mobility—dropping into a lower social class. A

decline in social class standing may occur due to factors such as being laid off, choosing to

pursue a less lucrative career path than your parents, making bad financial decisions, or

getting divorced (a common cause of downward mobility for women).13 It can also be

caused by issues entirely outside our control, such as entering the job market during a

recession.

The idea of the American Dream is regularly invoked by politicians, educators, religious

leaders, and media pundits. We also have shining models of the American Dream like Oprah

Chris Gardner. (Source: Wikimedia

Commons)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 13

Winfrey, who went from a childhood of poverty and abuse to become America’s first Black

billionaire, and Jay-Z, who lived in a housing project and sold drugs before becoming a

billionaire with impressive real estate and art collections.14 The idea that the American Dream

is alive and well is so pervasive that most people don’t even question it. Many of us just assume

that upward social mobility is the norm. “The sky's the limit,” to borrow a song title from the late

Notorious B.I.G.

Figure 1: Upward Mobility by Year of Birth

Source: The Equality of Opportunity Project15

But sociologists often refer to the American Dream as a myth—and with good reason.

As you can see from Figure 1, the likelihood that individuals will earn higher incomes than their

parents has been in steady decline since the 1940s. Currently, only about 50% of children will

experience upward mobility. And for African-Americans who want to live the American Dream

like Chris Gardner, Oprah, and Jay-Z, the odds are even lower. Compared to their White

counterparts, Blacks are not only more likely to be born into poverty but also much more likely

to stay in poverty throughout their lives. They are also more likely to experience downward

mobility—the reverse of the American Dream.16

The American Dream is such a powerful idea that it can feel unpatriotic to challenge it.

However, inspirational examples of individuals from humble origins who battle through

adversity and eventually triumph do not accurately reflect reality for most Americans. These

stories of shining stars make it seem as if achieving the American Dream is equally available to

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 14

everyone. But thinking back to the story of Alex that began this chapter, it should be obvious

that individuals like him face many more obstacles and disadvantages in their pursuit of the

American Dream than more privileged individuals do. As a result, social-class inequality is not

only widespread but is also increasing at a rapid pace—both in the United States and around

the globe.

REVIEW SHEET: SOCIAL CLASS

CLICK THE LINK FOR:

LEARNING OBJECTIVES KEY QUESTIONS

AUDIO KEY POINTS

PRACTICE QUIZ KEY PEOPLE

VOCABULARY CROSSWORD PUZZLES KEY TERMS

INEQUALITY

 What are some indicators of inequality in the U.S.?

 How is inequality related to ascribed characteristics like race and gender?

 To what extent is inequality increasing in the U.S. and across the globe?

In 2017, Yahoo announced that Marissa Mayer, the CEO, would leave the company

once its acquisition by Verizon was finalized. Mayer received a $23 million severance

payment; the full value of her severance pay and stock

options was nearly $260 million. That’s not a bad sum of

money for being fired.

While the amount of money Mayer received for

leaving the company may be startling, it’s not even close to

the highest severance payments in recent history. Consider

some of these final paydays: Jack Welch, CEO of General Marissa Mayer, former CEO of Yahoo.

(Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 15

Electric, received over $400 million; Lee Raymond, CEO of Exxon Mobile, received over $300

million; William McGuire, CEO of UnitedHealth Group, received nearly $300 million; and

Edward Whitacre, CEO of AT&T, received well over $200 million.

Consider the case of Robert Marcus. He became CEO of Time Warner at the beginning

of 2014. A few months later he negotiated himself out of a job by agreeing to sell the

company to Charter Communications. For those few months he worked as CEO of Time

Warner, Marcus walked away with a severance package of over $90 million.

And during the COVID-19 pandemic, when millions of workers filed unemployment

claims, the top CEOs actually gained wealth. The wealth of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg grew by billions of dollars.17 Bezos’s net worth is close to $200

billion, $80 billion of which has been gained during the pandemic. His ex-wife, MacKenzie

Scott, has a net worth of $60 billion, largely due to the value of her Amazon stock. Her wealth

continues to accumulate at a rapid pace even though she’s donated billions of dollars to a

variety of philanthropic activities.18

It might be hard to grasp what these figures actually mean. Most of us are probably

more comfortable talking about hundreds of dollars than hundreds of millions of dollars. Here’s

a little context: The median household income in the United States in 2019 was $68,703; half of

American households make more than this, and half make less.19 To make as much money as

Robert Marcus made in just a few months as CEO of Time Warner, a typical household in the

U.S. would have to work about 1,600 years. It would take over 7,000 years for the typical

household to earn the severance payment given to former General Electric CEO Jack Welch.

What do you think of these numbers? They’re just one measure of the very large and

increasing class inequality in the United States. In this section we consider some common

indicators of social class inequality as a way to more fully understand the growing gap

between the poor and the rich. The gap between CEO pay and the incomes of average

workers are a good place to begin because it highlights how large the gulf has gotten

between those at the top of the economic ladder and the rest of us.

Consider Figure 2, which shows how much CEO pay has increased in the past thirty

years compared to average worker salaries. Since 1987, the average CEO has seen his (and

the CEO is usually a he) compensation increase 1,000%. The compensation of an average

worker has barely increased at all. DoorDash CEO Tony Xu recently received a $414 million

compensation package. CEO pay increased 14.1% in 2020 compared with 2019, while workers

got a 1.9% raise.20 In 1987, the average yearly salary was a little more than $18,000.21 If a

worker making that salary in 1987 enjoyed the 1,000% increase that the typical CEO has

enjoyed, the worker would make $1.8 million a year now. Instead, the typical worker today

makes just under $50,000, the equivalent of about $24,000 in 1987. When you adjust for

inflation, there has been hardly any growth in worker pay.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 16

Figure 2: CEO Pay and Worker Pay, 1978-2017

The growing gap between the poor and the rich

Comparing the compensation of CEOs to typical workers highlights some of the

extreme levels of inequality that exist in the United States. We can gain further insight if we

refer to some other patterns.

Let’s begin with income inequality. We often hear that the gap between the rich and

the poor is growing every year. This becomes readily apparent when we look at the change in

income levels over time. For the overwhelming majority of Americans, income has been more

or less stagnant for nearly forty years (Figure 3). While the top 1% of the population has

enjoyed a huge increase in their incomes, and the top 5% to 20% have seen modest income

gains, the income of the bottom 80% of the population has remained virtually the same. Since

about 1979, only the privileged classes in the United States (like the CEOs in Figure 2) have

experienced income growth. For the majority classes and lower classes, wages today are

more or less equal to what they were forty years ago.22

Do you think this income inequality translates into increased wealth inequality as well? If

you recall, wealth is a measure of the total worth of everything someone owns. When we talk

about the rich getting richer and everyone else getting poorer, we’re not only talking about

income inequality; wealth inequality is just as important.

It’s probably not too surprising to learn that wealth inequality is closely associated with

income inequality, as Figure 4 suggests; it depicts the enormous gap between the rich and the

rest of society over the past 30 years. Notice how the shapes of the lines in this graph mirror the

lines in the income graph (Figure 3). Once again, we see that the privileged classes are

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 17

accumulating most of the wealth in the country while the financial gains for those in the

majority and lower classes are modest at best.

Figure 3: Average Pretax U.S. Income, 1979-2007

Source: Wikimedia Commons

The gap between the rich and

the rest of us, or the haves and have-

nots, is even more evident when we

also consider race. As Figure 5 illustrates,

the amount of wealth we have is

strongly correlated with race and

ethnicity. The wealth of Whites dwarfs

the wealth of Blacks and Hispanics.

Remember, when we discuss

wealth we’re not focusing on income

earned from employment or

investments. We’re talking about the

amount of money and assets that

someone has accumulated over time

Figure 4: Family Wealth in the United States, 1989-2013.

(Source: Congressional Budget Office)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 18

from various sources. Two individuals can have the same yearly income but drastically

different levels of wealth. The more wealth you have, the more opportunities you have to

increase wealth, pass that wealth on to your children, and be protected against life events

that might create enduring financial hardships. This is a crucial point for understanding how

social inequality continues to rise: having some wealth makes it easier to get more of it.

Figure 5: Average Family Wealth by Race/Ethnicity

Many social scientists argue that inequalities in wealth are the most significant factor in

the reproduction of inequality, particularly in regard to race and ethnicity.23 Sociologist

Thomas Shapiro spent the past two decades documenting the wealth gap between Blacks

and Whites. His research demonstrates quite clearly that many of the problems that Blacks

face—high rates of poverty, mass incarceration, and joblessness—can be directly connected

to the great wealth gaps between Black and White individuals.24

Shapiro details the cumulative advantages—

built up benefits and resources—that allow people

to increase their wealth. On average, White

individuals have been able to pass much more

money to their children than Blacks have because

they have not been saddled with the various types

of discrimination, particularly in federal housing

policies, that have severely reduced Blacks’

opportunities to build wealth. For instance, Black

Americans suffered loss of lives, homes, and Shoe-shine worker and client in Washington, D.C.

(Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 19

businesses in the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921 and the Elaine, Arkansas massacre of 1919,

making it impossible for families to develop generational wealth.25 Without being

systematically oppressed by slavery, violence, Jim Crow segregation, and institutional

discrimination, Whites have been able to increase their family wealth generation after

generation, whereas most Black families have never been able to anchor themselves

financially or have done so only very recently.

This whole process of cumulative advantages is largely invisible to Whites who benefit

from it. Most Whites cling to the notion of the American Dream and see their success as largely

the product of their own doing. Even those who have undeniably benefited financially from

their relatives (or from their ascribed social position) remain convinced that their social-class

status is wholly achieved. This belief that personal effort and smart individual choices can

overcome generations of structural inequality also contributes to the racial wealth gap, the

difference in accumulated wealth between different races and ethnicities. As long as

policymakers embrace the idea that social class is achieved, they will enact policies that

reflect this belief and ignore the external factors that produce and perpetuate social

inequality. Proposals to slash federal housing vouchers, food assistance, and Medicaid for low-

income individuals are indicative of this type of thinking.26

One idea to reduce the racial wealth gap is called “baby bonds,” a proposal from

Darrick Hamilton and William Darity. An account would be established by the federal

government for each child at birth, with the amount of money tied to the parents’ wealth. For

instance, a middle-class child might receive $20,000. Upper-class children would receive less,

poorer children would receive more. When the child turns 18, the funds become available to

use for college, a business venture, or to help buy a home. Over time, this program would help

alleviate the racial wealth gap and improve social mobility.27

The inability to recognize the existence and persistence of structural inequalities can be

demonstrated when we add more characteristics to the mix. When we look at the intersecting

effects of race, gender, education, and income, we see quite clearly that not everyone

enjoys the same path to financial success. As much as we may want to tout our own individual

efforts and accomplishments, there is no denying that some individuals are hampered by the

persistence of racism and sexism in American society.

Table 3 should hit close to home for many of you. Focusing on those aged 25-34, this

table shows how income is affected by gender, race, and education. You don’t have to study

the table very long to see some telling trends. In every category of educational attainment,

men make significantly more than women. Race also has an effect, with Blacks and Hispanics

almost always making less than Whites and Asians, even when they have the same level of

education.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 20

Table 3: Median Earnings (in 2015 Dollars) of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers Ages 25-34, by

Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Education Level, 2013-2015

Race/Ethnicity Gender Less than

HS Diploma

High

School

Diploma

Some

College,

No

Degree

Associate

Degree

Bachelor’s

Degree

Advanced

Degree

Asian Female $21,900 $25,900 $32,800 $32,200 $52,500 $66,400

Male $26,500 $30,500 $35,600 $36,200 $61,900 $80,200

Black Female $21,100 $25,400 $27,500 $31,200 $41,200 $50,900

Male $26,700 $27,800 $35,300 $36,500 $48,500 $52,600

Hispanic Female $21,000 $26,400 $30,100 $29,500 $44,800 $53,700

Male $25,200 $31,100 $36,300 $41,400 $50,500 $61,700

White Female $21,300 $27,400 $31,100 $33,200 $46,000 $55,500

Male $31,900 $36,700 $40,800 $45,000 $56,500 $66,900

All Female $21,100 $26,900 $30,500 $32,000 $45,800 $55,800

Male $26,400 $33,400 $38,400 $42,600 $55,600 $67,400

Source: Education Pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society28

Probably the most obvious fact from Table 3 is the importance of education. As

someone completes more education, their income level increases. This is true for every gender

and race; however, access to higher education is not evenly distributed. Race and class play

a large role in determining who attends and who graduates from college, as well as the type

of college they attend. The higher you are in the social class structure, the more likely it is that

you will attend and graduate from college. When we add race and ethnicity to the mix,

students of color are more likely than their White peers to attend community colleges or for-

profit colleges.29

You should see a pattern developing that helps explain the persistence of inequality.

Those of us who have ascribed characteristics that are not as advantageous as others (such

as being born into a lower social class, being a person of color, or being a woman) likely face

more structural obstacles than those who have more privileged ascribed characteristics.

Although many of us have faith in the idea of meritocracy, or a system where personal

responsibility and individual effort are the sole determinants of success, decades of research

make it clear that some individuals have an easier path to financial success than others.

Think about the idea of meritocracy in the context of the Operation Varsity Blues

scandal, which involved wealthy families paying bribes to have their children accepted by

prominent universities like Yale, Stanford, and Georgetown. In one example, Lori Loughlin and

Mossimo Giannulli plead guilty to paying $500,000 so their daughters could attend the

University of Southern California as recruits for the crew team. If paying a half-million-dollar

bribe isn’t egregious enough, their daughters weren’t actually involved in crew! Photographs

of the daughters on rowing machines were used to make it look like they were crew athletes.30

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 21

In writing about the scandal, Shamus Khan notes that it’s commonplace for rich families

to spend enormous amounts of money so their children can accumulate the kinds of

experiences that impress elite colleges. He writes “…almost all rich families buy their kids into

elite colleges by purchasing advantages they pass off as talents, whether by way of sailing

lessons or elaborate vacations planned with an eye on admissions essays. We view these

vastly overrepresented children of the rich as having earned their spots. And that’s the great

American delusion we call ‘meritocracy.’”31

In trying to understand social class inequality in America, it’s imperative that we

consider how ascribed social class, race, and gender propel some individuals forward while

holding others back.

U.S. inequality in global context

Now that you have a better understanding of inequality in the United States, you may

wonder how we stack up against other countries. Social scientists use a statistical measure

called the GINI index to compare inequality. The GINI index looks at how family income is

distributed in a country. If everyone in a country had the same income and there was total

equality, the GINI score would be 0. If one person in the country had all of the income, it

would cause total inequality and the GINI score would be 1. No country actually has a score

of 0 or 1, but countries that have less inequality are closer to 0 and countries that have a lot of

inequality are closer to 1.

Among the 31 most developed nations in the world, the United States has the second-

highest GINI index, behind only Chile. This ranking is based on after-tax income, not before-tax

calculations. In most countries, the tax structure reduces inequality and brings down the GINI

index by taxing affluent individuals at significantly higher rates than the lower or middle

classes. In fact, a number of countries rank quite a bit higher in inequality than the United

States before taxes are taken into account. But because those countries have tax policies that

are more favorable to the poor than the rich, their GINI index is lowered more significantly by

taxes than it is in the U.S.32

As drastic as inequality is in the U.S., it is nothing compared to the inequality that exists in

the global context. According to a report from Oxfam International, global levels of class

inequality have reached astounding levels:33

 The world’s 8 richest men have the same amount of wealth as the bottom 50% of the

world’s population.

 The richest 1% of the world’s population owns more wealth than the rest of the 99%

combined.

 The incomes of the poorest 10% increased by less than $3 a year between 1988 and

2011. During this same period, the incomes of the richest 1% increased by 182 times.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 22

 7 out of 10 people live in a country

that has seen a rise in inequality in

the last 30 years.

 Each of the 100 richest CEOs earns as

much in a year as 10,000 people

working in a garment factory in

Bangladesh.

There has been an economic

downturn in the global economy during the

COVID-19 pandemic, with millions fewer

people reaching the middle class than

what was anticipated prior to the

pandemic. The number of people in

poverty worldwide has increased significantly. The rise in global poverty during the pandemic

is strongly impacting South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, in particular.34

By all measures, these global inequalities are increasing every year. In fact, most

estimates suggest that within the next 25 years, the world may see its first trillionaire. But as the

wealth of the richest 1% increases to stratospheric levels, the world’s poor continue to suffer

from malnutrition and starvation, lack of access to clean water, exposure to sewage and

wastewater, illiteracy, poor housing, unsafe working conditions, and shortages of health care

providers and supplies. Poverty is the last topic of this chapter, but in many ways it’s the most

important for all of us, no matter our social class, to acknowledge and address. As former

South African prisoner and President Nelson Mandela once said, “As long as poverty, injustice,

and gross inequality exist in our world, none of us can truly rest.”

REVIEW SHEET: INEQUALITY

CLICK THE LINK FOR:

LEARNING OBJECTIVES KEY QUESTIONS

AUDIO KEY POINTS

PRACTICE QUIZ KEY PEOPLE

VOCABULARY CROSSWORD PUZZLES KEY TERMS

Dharavi Slum, Mumai, India. (Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 23

POVERTY AND HOMELESSNESS

 What is poverty and how is it measured?

 Who is at risk of poverty?

 Who are the working poor?

 How has the homeless population changed in recent years?

 What factors increase the risk of homelessness?

Desmond Spencer is a 39-year-old resident of Beaverton, Alabama. He dropped out of

school at 14 and eventually completed his GED. Before age 20, Desmond went to prison for

burglary. When he was released from prison his life improved somewhat when he found a

steady job as a roofer. But he suffered a knee injury when he fell off a roof on a job. He never

went to the doctor for his injury because he didn’t have health insurance. He eventually lost his

job during a difficult period in the economy. Desperate and unable to find steady work,

Desmond struggled with the decision to apply for federal disability benefits. Several people

close to him collect disability benefits, including his stepfather (who broke his back in a car

accident) and a cousin (who has bipolar disorder and receives $701 per month). Desmond

would prefer to work but was turned down for jobs at an upholstery factory and a horse-trailer

shop. He failed a math exam that would have allowed him to enroll at a community college

to take a welding class. Desmond makes $425 a month from a friend who pays him to take

care of his horses. Other than that, he relies on money from his parents and their disability

support checks. His mother finally convinced him to call the Social Security office and apply

for disability benefits. The question “Is this a permanent disability?” used to screen applicants

for eligibility stung him, but he answered yes.

The Washington Post article featuring Desmond reports that 13 million working-age

adults receive federal disability payments, an increase from 7.7 million in 1996. Rural America,

including where Desmond lives, has experienced the fastest increase in disability rates.35

Desmond's story is about poverty in America. Many of us have a specific image in mind

when we think of people who are poor, but their lives are remarkably diverse. In the final

section of the chapter we explore the persistent social problem of poverty and one of its most

visible forms: homelessness.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 24

What is poverty?

There are various ways to define, and to think about, poverty.36 One is to consider the

basic necessities of life, such as food, shelter, and clothing. People without these necessities

would be considered poor. This is absolute poverty. The U.S. Census Bureau takes this

approach to measuring poverty. The Census uses poverty thresholds to estimate the number

of Americans in poverty each year. For example, the official poverty threshold in 2020 was

$26,246 for a family of two adults and two children.37 This poverty threshold (also known as the

poverty line) establishes the minimum income level that the federal government says is

required to buy the basic necessities of life. According to the Census Bureau, in 2019 there

were 34 million Americans in poverty (4.2 million fewer people than 2018), for an official

poverty rate of 10.5% of the population. The poverty rate has decreased 4.3 percentage

points since 2014.38 However, the most recent Census Bureau figures are based on data from

before the COVID-19 pandemic.39

Another way to calculate poverty is to look at relative poverty. This measure takes into

account the relative economic status of people in a society by looking at how income is

distributed; those in the lowest income brackets would be considered poor in comparison to

others in their society. Mark Rank and Thomas Hirschl focus on the likelihood of experiencing

relative poverty between the ages of 25 and 60.40 They find that those who are younger (ages

25-34), non-White, female, not married, with 12 years or less of education, or who have a work

disability are significantly more likely to encounter poverty.

What does poverty mean to those who experience it? Being poor means having to

compromise and make difficult choices about food, shelter, clothing, healthcare,

transportation, and other needs. It means sometimes choosing between putting food on the

table and paying the heating bill to stay warm. It can mean being stuck in a high-crime

neighborhood with low-quality schools. As Mark Rank writes, “poverty extracts a heavy toll

upon those who fall into its ranks, particularly children. Countless studies have demonstrated

the physical and psychological health costs for children experiencing poverty.”41

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 25

Figure 6: U.S. Poverty Levels 1959-2016

Source: Wikimedia Commons

Characteristics of the poor

Poverty is not an equally shared experience. In the U.S., several characteristics place

some groups at more risk of poverty than others:

1. Household type – If you are in a household headed by a single mother, you are much

more likely to be poor than those in married-couple or single-father families.

2. Education – There is a high rate of poverty among adults who have not completed high

school. People without high school degrees are more than six times as likely to be poor

as those who have completed college.

3. Paid work – Those with no income are substantially more likely to be poor than are those

who earn even low incomes. The risk of poverty falls as someone’s attachment to the

labor market increases. Put simply, working for pay (especially high pay) is a poverty-

prevention tool.42

4. Disability status – For people aged 18 to 64 with a disability, the 2019 poverty rate was

22.5%, which amounted to 3.3 million people living in poverty.43 The unemployment rate

is high for individuals with disabilities. Even if their disabilities don’t prevent them from

working, they may face transportation challenges getting to work or encounter

employers who are hesitant to hire people with disabilities.44

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 26

5. Race – The poverty rate is approximately two times higher for African Americans,

Hispanics, and Native Americans than it is for Whites and Asian Americans. One factor

in the racial poverty gap is unemployment; the groups with higher poverty rates all

have higher unemployment rates than Whites and Asian Americans. The economic

impact of COVID-19 has been especially harmful to Black workers, who have been

more likely to lose jobs during the pandemic.45 Experiencing poverty within a family for

three generations is over 16 times as frequent among Black adults as among White

adults. This means one in five Black Americans are experiencing poverty for the third

generation in a row, with one in a hundred White Americans experiencing poverty for

three generations. Families being poor for three consecutive generations is almost

uniquely a Black experience.46

6. Region – The South has the highest poverty rate, while the Northeast has the lowest.

However, differences in poverty rates between regions are narrowing.47

7. Concentrated neighborhood poverty – High-poverty neighborhoods are Census tracts

where at least 40% of the population is poor. This concentration of poverty is significant

in light of the various social problems that exist in high-poverty areas (for instance,

crime, underfunded public schools with high dropout rates, social networks that lack

connections to good jobs). Growing income inequality, and income segregation in

neighborhoods as people of different classes are less likely to live in the same

neighborhood, has exacerbated concentrated poverty.48 Research shows that when

White families live in a poor neighborhood, it is typically for a single generation; their

children are able to move to a higher-income area. In contrast, neighborhood poverty

is most commonly multigenerational for African-American families.49

8. Child poverty – In 2019, 10.5 million children (those under 18 years old) lived in poverty;

children represented 30.8% of all people in poverty.50 Poverty levels among children

have remained high since the early 1970s. A racial disparity in child poverty rates has

also existed for decades, with much higher poverty rates among African-American and

Hispanic children than for White and Asian-American children. Poor children have been

at risk of suffering food insecurity and housing insecurity caused by financial distress

during the COVID-19 pandemic.51 Changes to the Child Tax Credit in the American

Rescue Plan of 2021 are intended to significantly reduce child poverty. As part of the

legislation, eligible families will temporarily receive monthly payments of up to $250 for

each child 6 to 17 years old and $300 for each child under age 6.52

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 27

Figure 7: U.S. Poverty Rates by County

(Source: Wikimedia Commons)

The working poor and the jobless poor

Maya Warren is one of millions of Americans who are working poor. She works as a

home health aide providing care to the elderly, earning about $300 a week. Late in her first

pregnancy, she took a second job as an Uber driver. The baby’s father does not have steady

income. When she went into labor the doctor recommended a Caesarean section (C-

section). This is major surgery that calls for 12 weeks of rest. However, six days after giving birth,

she had no choice but to go back to work driving for Uber.

Maya lives with her mother and is grateful for her support. Without her mother’s help,

she thinks she would be homeless. Her employer doesn’t provide paid family leave to home

health aides. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) allows workers to take up to 12

weeks of leave after a birth, but it is unpaid leave. And FMLA only applies to employees who

have worked at least one full year for their employer, and only if their employer has more than

50 employees. “You don’t work, you don’t get paid,” Maya explained, summing up her

situation and the reality of many low-income parents who don’t have the kinds of jobs that

come with paid family leave.53

Stereotypes of poor people are that they are lazy and don’t want to work. But millions

of poor people do work. Approximately 10.5 million individuals can be categorized as working

poor, defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) as people who spent at least 27 weeks

(half of the last year) in the labor force but whose incomes still fell below the official poverty

level.54 A BLS report reveals the following characteristics of the working poor:

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 28

 More women than men are classified as working poor.

 Blacks and Hispanics are more than twice as likely as Whites and Asians to be working

poor.

 Families headed by women are more likely to be poor than those headed by men.

 Families with children under age 18 are more likely to be working poor than those

without children.

 Married-couple families are less likely than families headed by a single parent to fall

below the poverty level.

 Full-time workers are less likely than part-time workers to be working poor.

 People with higher levels of education are less likely to be working poor. More

education means better access to higher-paying jobs.

 Low earnings and periods of unemployment are key factors in falling below the poverty

line.

Service occupations account for nearly 40% of the working poor. Fast-food employees

are a good example of workers who struggle in low-wage service jobs. They are featured in

Katherine Newman's book No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City:55

Nadine comes from a poor family and has not yet finished high school. Her father died

during her childhood and her mother relies on public assistance. She dreams of leaving her

neighborhood and describes the building where she lives as disgusting and roach-infested.

Larry struggles to finish high school while he works, but is determined to do so. He can’t

remember a time when his mother worked. He hopes that one day he will be able to attend

college: “The only way you’ll be able to survive life is to get a good education.”

Roberta is a manager with a steady salary. She can make ends meet but still lives

paycheck to paycheck. She knows that an emergency or an unexpected bill will put her

immediately into major financial distress. She doesn’t make enough to save and wonders if

she’ll ever be able to retire.

Newman describes working poor people like Nadine, Larry, and Roberta as one

paycheck away from welfare. The working poor are constantly on the edge of getting fired

(often due to unreliable transportation or childcare for their children) or evicted. Many suffer

from inadequate housing, poor diets, bad schools, and lack of medical attention. It is a life of

being insecure and vulnerable.

As Newman points out, the U.S. economy has drastically changed over the past several

decades, with a sharp decline in high-paying jobs and a surge in low-paying jobs. The

economy now favors the well-educated, and high-paying jobs are especially hard for those

with lower levels of education to get.

Service workers have been deemed essential during the COVID-19 pandemic, placing

grocery store, retail, and fast-food workers at risk, leading some to participate in strikes for

better work conditions. Workers at one McDonald’s location said they were told to make

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 29

masks using coffee filters. Delia Vargas was quoted as saying: “McDonald’s is treating us like

dogs. We don’t want to die for their hamburgers so we are going on strike, to protect

ourselves, our families and our communities.”56

The transformation of the economy has hurt people in a variety of places. William Julius

Wilson addresses the decrease in job opportunities for people in urban areas, especially in the

Northeast and Midwest.57 Think of Philadelphia, Chicago, and Detroit. A shift away from

manufacturing in these and other cities resulted in a decline in high-paying factory jobs for

people with less education. New jobs were more often located in suburban locations, creating

a challenge for city residents who don’t own cars and rely on public transportation. The

decline of manufacturing, plus lack of access to work in the suburbs, led to more joblessness.

These changes were especially damaging for African Americans in urban areas, since they

often found it difficult to move to the suburbs and lacked college degrees that might allow

them to pursue high-skilled jobs in cities. The rise of joblessness was also a factor in the

deterioration of neighborhoods: Families with more resources were able to move, leaving

behind poor families who often struggled to maintain their homes and yards.

In $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost

Nothing in America, Kathryn Edin and H.

Luke Shaefer shed light on the hardships of

living in poverty in places such as

Mississippi and Kentucky.58 The decline of

coal mining in eastern Kentucky and the

mechanization of farming in the Mississippi

Delta are part of the reason for high rates

of joblessness in these places. Imagine

poverty so extreme that you would sell

your children’s Social Security numbers for

cash (so people can use those numbers

for tax benefits). Or consider Jessica

Compton, who sells her plasma several

times a month to cover rent. The $30 she

receives each time is the only money to count on now that her husband, Travis, no longer gets

shifts to work at McDonald’s. They are three months behind on rent and worried they may be

evicted. Jessica and Travis are barely able to support themselves and their two children.

Homelessness

Dasani spent three years of her life at a homeless shelter in Brooklyn. The shelter’s

problems included spoiled food, mold, lead paint, bedbugs, roaches, discarded crack pipes,

and sexual misconduct by employees. This 11-year-old is one of more than 20,000 homeless

There's some protection from the rain but little from wind

and cold, making for a difficult wait for transportation to

work or school. (Source: Photo provided by the authors)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 30

children in New York City. One room was the main living space for Dasani, her parents, and

seven siblings, including a baby sister she is often responsible for feeding, changing, and

babysitting. Her parents are unemployed and suffer from drug addiction. She does her best at

school, admires her teachers, and made the honor roll, but is occasionally teased for where

she lives and the clothes she wears. A fight with a classmate lead to a week of suspension.

Prior to the shelter, Dasani and her family lived in a duplex, and before that, an

apartment. They were dependent on rent subsidies that eventually expired. Rent kept going

up; one-bedroom apartments cost $1,300 a month. The demand for public housing far

exceeds the supply. Families like Dasani’s are desperate for affordable housing at a time when

nearby condominiums sell for $1.5 million and brownstone homes for more than $2 million.

“If I could grant you three wishes, what would they be?” a school counselor asked

Dasani. She wished for a home, a lot of money, and three more wishes. One wish came true

when a space finally opened at another shelter. This shelter had an apartment with a kitchen,

a full bathroom, and two bedrooms. The mattresses are in good condition, a welcome

change from broken mattresses with exposed coils.

Dasani’s experience with homelessness

provides an introduction to one of America's most

devastating social problems.59 Someone is

homeless if they lack a fixed, regular, and

adequate nighttime residence.60 The homeless

population in the United States is established by

what is known as the point-in-time count. In late

January, communities across the country count

the number of homeless people living in

emergency shelters, transitional housing, or on the

street. From this data collection, we know that

580,466 people experienced homelessness in the

U.S. in 2020; 18% of those (106,364) were children.

Single individuals make up 70% of the

homeless population; the remaining 30% are

families. When we focus on individuals

experiencing homelessness on their own,

approximately 70% are men. But when we look at

homeless families, approximately 60% are

comprised of girls and women.

In 2020, the sheltered homeless (people staying in emergency shelters, transitional

housing programs, or safe havens) accounted for 61% of the homeless population, with the

remaining 39% experiencing unsheltered homelessness (their primary nighttime residence is a

Migrant Mother by Dorothea Lange (1936).

(Source: Wikipedia Commons)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 31

public or private place not designated for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping space,

such as the streets, vehicles, or parks). Approximately 8% (or 37,252) of people experiencing

homelessness are military veterans.

Approximately 25% (or 110,528 people) of the homeless population experiences chronic

homelessness. A chronically homeless individual is someone with a disability who has a) been

continuously homeless for a year or more or b) has experienced at least four episodes of

homelessness in the past three years where the combined length of the homeless episodes is

at least 12 months. Disabilities include substance use disorders, serious mental illness,

developmental disabilities, posttraumatic stress disorder, cognitive impairments resulting from a

brain injury, or chronic physical illness or disability.

Keep in mind the challenging task of counting the homeless population. Suburban and

rural areas are difficult to cover. It’s hard to collect information on people sleeping in

makeshift locations, such as vacant lots and railway yards. These counts leave out people in

marginal living situations, such as prostitutes who stay in hotels paid for by clients.61 Young

people may try to hide their homelessness due to embarrassment, and may be reluctant to

report they are homeless when they encounter adults doing counts.62 For these reasons, point-

in-time counts are imprecise and may undercount the homeless population.63

Figure 8: Number of Homeless Individuals in the U.S., 2007-2017

Source: Data from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2017

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

2017

5

40,000

5

20,000

549,928

553,742

5

60,000

5

64,708

5

76,450 5

80,000

5

90,364

6

20,000

6

623,788

621,553

6

30,227

6

37,077 6

40,000

6

39,784

6

47,258

6

60,000

People Experiencing

Homelessness

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 32

In 2007, the homeless population was 647,258. The homeless population has decreased

since then, as the economy improved after the Great Recession that began in December

2007 and officially ended in June 2009. It wasn’t until 2013, several years after the end of the

recession, that the number of homeless individuals fell below 600,000. However, the homeless

population has increased each year from 2017 to 2020.

Martha Burt identifies three types of factors that create the conditions, such as extreme

poverty, that increase the risk of homelessness.64 The first type is structural factors such as

changes in the housing market, employment opportunities, criminal justice policies, and

institutional support for poor people and people with disabilities. The second type is individual

characteristics such as disabilities, mental illness, addiction, and a felony record. The third type

involves public policy. Effective policies can prevent homelessness and reduce the impact of

structural and personal factors that place people at risk of homelessness. “It would not be a

bad policy decision to provide every household that has a worst-case housing need with a

rent subsidy for as long as possible,” she says. Recently, policy approaches have shifted away

from emergency services for the homeless to a broader focus on preventing and reducing

homelessness. Strategies increasingly focus on permanent housing solutions.

The importance of affordable housing

Arleen Beale and her family have no stable housing. They have lived in a homeless

shelter. They have lived in an apartment where they couldn’t count on having running water.

And they have lived in an apartment complex described as a haven for drug dealers. They

were evicted on multiple occasions.

Arleen’s son Jori attended five different schools during seventh and eighth grades. Their

most recent home, the bottom unit of a duplex with a rent of $550 a month, was better than

some of the places they lived. But the rent used up nearly 90% of her public assistance check.

A long time ago, at age 19, Arleen rented a subsidized apartment for $137 a month. But she

left public housing to move in with a friend. She didn’t realize how hard it would be to get

back into public housing; the waitlist is long and moves slowly. Looking back, she regrets

leaving a place where she imagines she could still be. Unable to keep up with her current rent,

she is a few days away from another eviction.

As Matthew Desmond explains in his award-winning book, Evicted: Poverty and Profit in

The American City, the majority of poor renting families like Arleen’s spend more than half their

income on housing; nevertheless, millions are evicted annually.65 In Milwaukee, where

Desmond conducted his research, landlords legally evict roughly 16,000 adults and children

each year. A high percentage of Milwaukee’s evicted tenants are Black women. As Desmond

points out, incarceration is a significant force in the life of poor Black men, while eviction is a

significant factor in the life of poor Black women: “Poor Black men were locked up. Poor Black

women were locked out.”66

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 33

The eviction crisis is expected to get worse. Temporary eviction moratoriums put in

place at the beginning of the U.S. COVID-19 outbreak in spring 2020 provided some protection

for renters. But when those moratoriums end, low-income and unemployed renters are at high

risk of eviction. Aaron Carr, founder and executive director of the Housing Rights Initiative,

says, “Allowing eviction moratoriums and expanded unemployment benefits to expire will

undoubtedly lead to a perfect storm of instability, homelessness, and human suffering.”67

The importance of having an affordable place to live cannot be overstated. If

someone is asked to identify the main necessities of life, a likely response is food, shelter, and

clothing. As Desmond explains in Evicted, “Without stable shelter, everything else falls apart.” A

stable home supports our psychological well-being, encourages social relationships, and

provides a consistent educational setting for children. When people are secure in a home, our

communities are made stronger. But millions of low-income households have limited options

for permanent affordable housing. Those with a record of eviction or bad credit scores face

rejection from landlords. Increasingly, the best option for many low-income Americans is to

seek temporary living situations in extended-stay hotels. Hotel living is so common that the

school system in Columbus, Ohio, makes 16 bus stops at hotels and motels. The Gwinnett

County school system in Georgia makes 91 bus stops at hotels and motels to pick up 600

students.68

Desmond believes that housing is not just a need but a right. He recommends

expanding the Housing Choice Voucher Program. This is a federal program for low-income

families (and the elderly and disabled) to afford decent and safe housing in the private

market, including single-family homes, townhouses, and apartments. Too many poor families

are forced to spend most of their income on housing. Desmond calls for a universal housing

voucher program for every family below a certain income level. Millions of poor families would

then be able to seek housing in the private market. More families in stable homes would mean

far less government money spent on the costs of homelessness.

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 34

Desmond’s arguments

reflect many of the larger themes

we have addressed throughout

this chapter. We have shown how

our social class standing is not just

a matter of individual efforts and

initiatives; there are larger

structural and institutional forces

that influence our class positions

and are responsible for the

growing inequality in the U.S. and

around the world. If we address

some of these structural and

institutional forces, we have a

greater likelihood of reducing

social class inequality and poverty.

The popular conception of social class in America is that there is a tried-and-true

formula: hard work translates to success, which leads to upward mobility. If you work hard and

stay on track you can achieve the American Dream. But the reality of social class is much

more complicated. There are drastic levels of income and wealth inequality in America.

If we think of ourselves as contestants in a race, those who have more wealth have a

head start. We like to think that everyone is running in a fair race, but those with built-in

advantages (high income, better schools, good health care, easy access to nutritious food,

secure housing, reliable transportation) have a significantly better chance of succeeding in

the race than those like Alex Russo or Desmond Spencer or Arleen Beale’s son Jori. It isn’t that

those who are disadvantaged shouldn’t bother to compete or that they have no chance to

succeed. But we need to be honest about social class and recognize that it greatly enables

some and severely constrains others.

Possessions placed on the sidewalk after an eviction. (Source)

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 35

REVIEW SHEET: POVERTY AND HOMELESSNESS

CLICK THE LINK FOR:

LEARNING OBJECTIVES KEY QUESTIONS

AUDIO KEY POINTS

PRACTICE QUIZ KEY PEOPLE

VOCABULARY CROSSWORD PUZZLES KEY TERMS

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 36

REFERENCES

1 This name is a pseudonym. 2 Kennedy, Merrit. 2016. “Lead-Laced Water in Flint: A Step-By-Step Look At The Makings Of A Crisis.” Retrieved at:

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/20/465545378/lead-laced-water-in-flint-a-step-by-step-look-at-the- makings-of-

a-crisis; Bosman, Julie. 2017. “On This Block, Worries Run Deeper than Flint’s Tainted Water.” The New York Times. Retrieved at:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/us/flint-water-blight-violence.html 3 MacLeod, Jay. 2008. Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low Income Neighborhood, Third Edition. Boulder, CO:

Westview Press. 4 Palus, Shannon. 2015. “Nine Out of Ten Americans Consider Themselves Middle Class.” Smithsonian.com. Retrieved at:

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/nine-out-10-americans-consider-themselves-middle-class-180954970/

5 Gilbert, Dennis. 2015. The American Class Structure in the Age of Growing Inequality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 6 Huber, Makenzie. April 15, 2020. “‘I Lost Him because of that Horrible Place’: Smithfield Worker Dies from COVID-19.” Sioux Falls

Argus Leader. Retrieved at: https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/crime/2020/04/15/smithfield-foods-sioux-falls-sd-worker-dies-

coronavirus-hot-spot/2994502001/ 7 Gilbert, Dennis. 2015. The American Class Structure in the Age of Growing Inequality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 8 Sherman, Arlock, Robert Greenstein, and Kathy Ruffing. 2012. “Contrary to ‘Entitlement Society’ Rhetoric, Over Nine- Tenths of

Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved at:

http://www.cbpp.org/research/contrary-to-entitlement-society-rhetoric-over-nine-tenths-of-entitlement-benefits-go-

to?fa=view&id=3677 9 Pascarella, Ernest T., Christopher T. Pierson, Gregory C. Wolniak, and Patrick T. Terenzini. 2004. “First-Generation College Students:

Additional Evidence on College Experiences and Outcomes.” The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3): 249-284. 10 Hinchliffe, Emma. June 2, 2021. “The female CEOs on this year’s Fortune 500 just broke three all-time records.” Fortune. Retrieved

at: https://fortune.com/2021/06/02/female-ceos-fortune-500-2021-women-ceo-list-roz-brewer-walgreens-karen-lynch-cvs-

thasunda-brown-duckett-tiaa/; McGirt, Ellen and Aric Jenkins. February 4, 2021. “Where are the Black CEOs?” Fortune. Retrieved

at: https://fortune.com/2021/02/04/black-ceos-fortune-500/ 11 The College Board. 2013. Total Group Profile Report: 2013 College Bound Seniors. Retrieved at:

http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/research/2013/TotalGroup-2013.pdf 12 Lareau, Annette. 2000. Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Income in Elementary Education, Second Edition. Lanham,

MD: Rowman and Littlefield. 13 Newman, Katherine S. 1988. Falling From Grace: Downward Mobility in the Age of Affluence. Berkeley, CA: University of

California Press. 14 Greenburg, Zack O’Malley. June 3, 2019. “Artist, Icon, Billionaire: How Jay-Z Created His $1 Billion Fortune.” Fortune. Retrieved at:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackomalleygreenburg/2019/06/03/jay-z-billionaire-worth/#21c778fb3a5f; Saner, Emine. January 12,

2018. “Oprah Winfrey: From Poverty to America’s First Black Billionaire …to #Oprah2020?” The Guardian. Retrieved at:

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/jan/12/oprah-winfrey-unlikely-to-run-for-us-president-but-could-win-if-she-did 15 Raj Chetty, Raj, David Grusky, Maximilian Hell, Nathaniel Hendren, Robert Manduca, and Jimmy Narang. 2016. “The Fading

American Dream: Trends in Absolute Income Mobility since 1940.” The Equality of Opportunity Project. Retrieved at:

https://opportunityinsights.org/paper/the-fading-american-dream/ 16 Reeves, Richard V. 2013. “The Other American Dream: Social Mobility, Race, and Opportunity.” The Brookings Institution.

Retrieved at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2013/08/28/the-other-american-dream- social-mobility-

race-and-opportunity/; Sawhill, Isabel V., Scott Winship, and Kerry Searle Grannis. 2012. “Pathways to the Middle Class: Balancing

Personal and Public Responsibilities.” Center for Children and Families at Brookings. Retrieved at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-

content/uploads/2016/06/0920-pathways-middle-class-sawhill-winship.pdf 17 Ponciano, Jonathan. May 23, 2020. “The World’s 25 Richest Billionaires Have Gained Nearly $255 Billion in Just Two Months.”

Forbes. Retrieved at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanponciano/2020/05/22/billionaires-zuckerberg-bezos/#7dc42ef57ed6 18 Tognini, Giacomo. June 10, 2021. “After Two Weeks At No. 2, Jeff Bezos Is Once Again The Richest Person In The World.” Forbes.

Retrieved at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2021/06/10/after-two-weeks-at-no-2-jeff-bezos-is-once-again-the-

richest-person-in-the-world/ ; Kulish, Nicholas, and David Gelles. June 15, 2021. “MacKenzie Scott Gives Away Another $2.74 Billion

Even as Her Wealth Grows.” The New York Times. Retrieved at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/15/business/mackenzie-scott-

philanthropy.html 19 Rothbaum, Jonathan. September 15, 2020. “Census Bureau Still Studying Full Impact of Pandemic on Income Data.” Retrieved

at: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2020/09/was-household-income-the-highest-ever-in-2019.html 20 Eavis, Peter. June 11, 2021. “Meager Rewards for Workers, Exceptionally Rich Pay for C.E.O.s.” The New York Times. Retrieved

from: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/11/business/ceo-pay-compensation-stock.html 21 Social Security Wage Administration. National Average Wage Index. Retrieved at: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/AWI.html 22 Cohen, Patricia. 2016. “A Bigger Economic Pie, but a Smaller Slice for Half of the U.S.” New York Times. Retrieved at:

http://nyti.ms/2nN7BGr 23 “No metric more powerfully captures the persistence and growth of economic inequality along racial and ethnic lines than the

racial wealth gap.” Traub, Amy, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede, and Tom Shapiro. 2017. The Asset Value of Whiteness:

Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap. NY: Demos. Retrieved at:

http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/Asset%20Value%20of%20Whiteness_0.pdf

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 37

24 Shapiro, Thomas M. 2017. Toxic Inequality: How American’s Wealth Gap Destroys Mobility, Deepens the Racial Divide, and

Threatens Our Future. NY: Basic Books. Shapiro, Thomas M. 2005. The Hidden Cost of Being African American: How Wealth

Perpetuates Inequality. NY: Oxford University Press. Oliver, Melvin L. and Thomas M. Shapiro. 1995. Black Wealth/White Wealth: A

New Perspective on Racial Inequality. NY: Routledge. 25 Parshina-Kottas, Yuliya, Anjali Singhvi, Audra D.S. Burch, Troy Griggs, Mika Gröndahl, Lingdong Huang, Tim Wallace, Jeremy

White and Josh Williams. May 24, 2021. “What the Tulsa Race Massacre Destroyed.” The New York Times. Retrieved at:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/24/us/tulsa-race-massacre.html; Logan, Trevon and William Darity Jr. September 21,

2020. “Look What Has Been Taken From Black Americans.” Bloomberg. Retrieved at:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-09-21/calculating-reparations-look-what-s-been-taken-from-black-americans 26 Thrush, Glenn. 2018. “Trump’s Vow on Welfare Faces an Uncertain Future.” Retrieved at:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/us/trumps-federal-benefits-employment.html 27 Oliver, Melvin L. and Thomas M. Shapiro. May 7, 2019. “Disrupting the Racial Wealth Gap.” Contexts. Retrieved at:

https://contexts.org/articles/disrupting-the-racial-wealth-gap/?_ga=2.259804746.1784805916.1557855138-1012464812.1553789789;

Lowrey, Annie. June 29, 2020. “A Cheap, Race-Neutral Way to Close the Racial Wealth Gap.” The Atlantic. Retrieved at:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/close-racial-wealth-gap-baby-bonds/613525/ 28 Ma, Jennifer Ma, Matea Pender, and Meredith Welch. 2016. “Education Pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for

Individuals and Society.” The College Board. Retrieved at: https://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/education-pays-

2016-full-report.pdf 29 For examples of the race gap in higher education see: Ross, Terris, Grace Kena, Amy Rathbun, Angelina KewalRamani, Jijun

Zhang, Paul Kristapovich, and Eileen Manning. 2012. Higher Education: Gaps in Access and Persistence Study (NCES 2012-046). U.S.

Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved at:

https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012046.pdf. Young Invincibles. 2017. Race and Ethnicity as a Barrier to Opportunity: A Blueprint for

Higher Education Equity. Retrieved at: http://younginvincibles.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/03/Blueprint-FINAL-REV.pdf 30 Booker, Brakkton. May 21, 2020. “Lori Loughlin, Mossimo Giannulli to Plead Guilty in College Admissions Scandal.” NPR. Retrieved

at: https://www.npr.org/2020/05/21/860073870/lori-loughlin-mossimo-giannulli-to-plead-guilty-in-college-admissions-scandal;

Taylor, Kate. April 10, 2020. “Photos Show Lori Loughlin’s Daughters Posing as Rowers, Prosecutors Say.” The New York Times.

Retrieved at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/us/lori-loughlin-rowing-photograph.html 31 Khan, Shamus. March 14, 2019. “How to Weasel your Kid into an Elite College without Paying Bribes.” The Washington Post.

Retrieved at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/the-college-admissions-game-is-rigged-arresting-cheaters-wont-change-

that/2019/03/14/2127b340-4606-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html 32 DeSilver, Drew. 2013. “Global Inequalities: How the U.S. Compares.” Pew Research Center. Retrieved at:

http://pewrsr.ch/1bSbQln. Matthews, Dylan. 2013. “The Government is the Only Reason U.S. Inequality is So High.” The Washington

Post. Retrieved at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/12/05/the-government-is-the-only-reason-u-s-

inequality-is-so-high/ 33 Oxfam International. 2017. An Economy for the 99%. Retrieved at: https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-99 34 Kochhar, Rakesh. March 18, 2021. “The Pandemic Stalls Growth in the Global Middle Class, Pushes Poverty Up Sharply.” Pew

Research Center. Retrieved at: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/03/18/the-pandemic-stalls-growth-in-the-global-

middle-class-pushes-poverty-up-sharply/ 35 McCoy, Terrence. 2017. “Disabled, or Just Desperate?” The Washington Post. Retrieved at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/local/2017/03/30/disabled-or-just-desperate/ 36 Rank, Mark Robert. 2004. One Nation, Underprivileged: Why American Poverty Affects Us All. New York: Oxford University Press. 37 U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved at: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-

thresholds.html 38 Semega, Jessica, Kollar, Melissa, Shrider, Emily and John Creamer. 2020. “Income and Poverty in the United States: 2019.” Report

P60-270. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved at https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-

270.html 39 Boghani, Priyanka. December 8, 2020. “How COVID Has Impacted Poverty in America.” PBS.org. Retrieved at:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/covid-poverty-america/ 40 Rank, Mark R., and Thomas Hirschl. 2015. “The Likelihood of Experiencing Relative Poverty over the Life Course.” PLoS ONE, 10(7):

1-11. 41 Rank, Mark. April 15, 2018. “The Cost of Keeping Children Poor.” The New York Times. Retrieved at:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/15/opinion/children-poverty-cost.html 42 Gornick, Janet C., and Markus Jäntti. 2016. “Poverty.” Pp. 15-24 in The Poverty and Inequality Report. The Stanford Center on

Poverty and Inequality. Retrieved at: http://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Pathways-SOTU-2016.pdf 43 Semega, Jessica, Kollar, Melissa, Shrider, Emily and John Creamer. 2020. “Income and Poverty in the United States: 2019.” Report

P60-270. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved at:

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-270.pdf 44 Pam Fessler. July 23, 2015. “Why Disability and Poverty Still Go Hand In Hand 25 Years after Landmark Law.” Retrieved at:

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/07/23/424990474/why-disability-and-poverty-still-go-hand-in- hand-25-years-after-

landmark-law 45 Iceland, John. 2006. Poverty in America: A Handbook. Second Edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Burns, Katelyn.

June 6, 2020. “The Unemployment Rate Improved in May, but Left Black Workers Behind.” Vox. Retrieved at:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/6/6/21282611/black-workers-left-behind-unemployment 46 Winship, Scott, Christopher Pulliam, Ariel Gelrud Shiro, Richard Reeves, and Santiago Deambrosi. June 10, 2021. “Long shadows:

The Black-white gap in multigenerational poverty.” Brookings.edu. Retrieved at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/long-

shadows-the-black-white-gap-in-multigenerational-poverty/

Social Class, Inequality, & Poverty (Fall 2021)

Page 38

47 Chaudry, Ajay, Christopher Wimer, Suzanne Macartney, Lauren Frohlich, Colin Campbell, Kendall Swenson, Don Oellerich, and

Susan Hauan. 2016. “Poverty in the United States: 50-Year Trends and Safety Net Impacts.” U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/154286/50YearTrends.pdf 48 Iceland, John, and Erik Hernandez. 2017. “Understanding Trends in Concentrated Poverty: 1980-2014.” Social Science Research

62: 75-95. 49 Sharkey, Patrick. 2013. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress toward Racial Equality. Chicago: The

University of Chicago Press. 50 Semega, Jessica, Kollar, Melissa, Shrider, Emily, and John Creamer. 2020. “Income and Poverty in the United States: 2019.”

Retrieved at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-270.pdf 51 Brown, Susan. L. 2012. “Poverty Status and the Effects of Family Structure on Child Well-Being.” Pp. 54-67 in The Oxford Handbook

of Poverty and Child Development, Valerie Maholmes and Rosalind B. King, eds. New York: Oxford University Press. Gennetian, Lisa

A. and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek. May 13, 2020. “Where’s the Rallying Cry? America’s Children Are Unequally Prepared to Absorb the

Impacts of COVID-19.” Retrieved at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2020/05/13/wheres-the-

rallying-cry-americas-children-are-unequally-prepared-to-absorb-the-impacts-of-covid-19/ 52 Pulliam, Christopher and Richard Reeves. March 11, 2021. “New child tax credit could slash poverty now and boost social

mobility later.” Brookings.edu. Retrieved at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2021/03/11/new-child-tax-credit-could-

slash-poverty-now-and-boost-social-mobility-later/ 53 Paquette, Danielle. 2016. “She Was Pregnant and Broke. She Signed Up for Uber—and Fell Into Debt.” The Washington Post.

Retrieved at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/she-had-a-newborn-and-no-money-signing-up-for-%20uber-

drove-her-into-debt/2017/04/07/b5ee9510-05d1-11e7-b9fa-ed727b644a0b_story.html Info about the Family and Medical Leave

Act available at: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fmla/employer-guide 54 “A Profile of the Working Poor, 2013.” July 2015. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Report 1055. Retrieved at:

https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/working-poor/archive/a-profile-of-the-working-poor-2013.pdf 55 Newman, Katherine. 1999. No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 56 Read, Bridget. May 27, 2020. “Every Food and Delivery Strike Happening Over Coronavirus.” The Cut. Retrieved at:

https://www.thecut.com/2020/05/whole-foods-amazon-mcdonalds-among-coronavirus-strikes.html 57 Wilson, William Julius. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Vintage. 58 Edin, Kathryn and H. Luke Shaefer. 2015. $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 59 Elliott, Andrea. 2013. “Invisible Child.” The New York Times. Retrieved at: http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/invisible-child/ 60 Definitions and statistics in this section of the text are from: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. “The 2020

Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress.” Washington, D.C. Retrieved at:

https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2020-AHAR-Part-1.pdf 61 Wakin, Michele. 2014. Otherwise Homeless: Vehicle Living and the Culture of Homelessness. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press. 62 Watson, Bernadine. 2013. “The Number of Homeless Youth Is Growing, but Funding to Help Them Is Not” The Washington Post.

Retrieved at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2013/12/20/the-number-of-homeless-youth- is-growing-

but-funding-to-help-them-is-not/ See also Fernandes-Alcantara, Adrienne L. 2018. “Runaway and Homeless Youth: Demographics

and Programs” Retrieved at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33785.pdf 63 Burt, Martha R. 2016. “Three Decades of Homelessness.” Pp. 47-66 in Ending Homelessness: Why We Haven’t, How We Can,

Donald W. Burnes and David L. DiLeo, eds. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. 64 Burt, Martha R. 2016. “Three Decades of Homelessness.” Pp. 47-66 in Ending Homelessness: Why We Haven’t, How We Can,

Donald W. Burnes and David L. DiLeo, eds. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. 65 Desmond, Matthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in The American City. New York: Crown Publishers. 66 Desmond, Matthew. 2016. “Forced Out.” The New Yorker. Retrieved at:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/08/forced-out 67 Kirby, Jen. July 8, 2020. “America’s Looming Housing Catastrophe, Explained.” Vox. Retrieved at:

https://www.vox.com/21301823/rent-coronavirus-covid-19-housing-eviction-crisis 68 Frazier, Mya. May 20, 2021. “When No Landlord Will Rent to You, Where Do You Go?” The New York Times. Retrieved at:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/20/magazine/extended-stay-hotels.html

Cover Photo Source: Todd Schoepflin