Chapter 2

Evolution and intelligent design

This scientific theory on how certain aspects of out lives take place attempts to align itself rather close to my beliefs. All happenings in this life happen based on certain natural occurrence which in this case has been dubbed natural selection. All aspects of life are being controlled by some aspects that as human beings, we really do not have control over. Each person is uniquely different from each other hence the reason why all beings have little to no control over their control on their survival. Nature is responsible for all happenings in life hence takes the role of a supreme being that has cumulative control over life.

For everything in life to work out, there has to be an aspect of balance. This balance is achieved by some attribute of the world by name nature which controls the selection of what survives and what does not else everything would be imperfectly balanced. As a way to influence survival, evolution has taken place which is to come up with a perfect design to have a casual mechanism that explains intellectual aspects in nature. This theory would then make sense as it attempts to give a description as to how all aspects of life came into existence other than articulating that every arose from unseen and unfelt attributes.

Science and the uncaused universe

This theory articulates that life and other aspects of the environment that we see may have arose from quantum electrodynamics. These are unseen and unfelt aspects of life. They are hence practically nothing which hence makes it impossible for anything to come from nothing. Quantum mechanics is a discipline that has been created by human beings to prove aspects that cannot be proven hence disqualifies the aspect of any questions being directed as nothing can be questioned due to their invisible aspect. This hence questions the legitimacy of this theory.

There are just too many loopholes that compromise any attempts for the theory to justify the emergence of life which is seen and can be felt. From the theory, sub atoms behave in a rather unpredictable and random way. This hence only explains the difficult for sub atoms to cumulate together and form an actual being or item. Having some belief in the unseen may be crucially undermining in achieving any definitive explanation for the various aspects in environments around us. As humans and other items in nature, as a result of the instability of these atoms, we would then be continuously disintegration or non-existent at all.

Consider the quotations on (p. 78). Which scientist's belief quoted on that page is closest to your view? Which scientist's belief is farthest from your view? Please respond with a 400-500-word essay.

What scientists are you quoting? least belief scientists are you quoting?