Discussion Question
Chapter 15 Measurement and Data Quality
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
1
Question #1
Tell whether the following statement is true or false:
Measurement involves assigning numbers to objects to represent the amount of an attribute.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Answer to Question #1
True
Measurement involves assigning numbers to objects to represent the amount of an attribute, using a specified set of rules. Researchers strive to develop or use measurements whose rules are isomorphic with reality.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Measurement
The assignment of numbers to represent the amount of an attribute present in an object or person, using specific rules
Rules are necessary to promote consistency and interpretability
Advantages
Removes guesswork
Provides precise information
Less vague than words
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
4
Theories of Measurement
Psychometrics is a branch of psychology concerned with the theory and methods of psychological measurement.
Two theories
Classical test theory (CTT)
Item response theory (IRT)
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
5
Errors of Measurement
Obtained score = True score + Error
Obtained score: an actual data value for a participant
True score: value that would be obtained for a hypothetical perfect measure attribute
Error of measurement: represents measurement inaccuracies
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
6
Factors That Contribute to Errors of Measurement
Situational contaminants
Transitory personal factors
Response-set biases
Administration variations
Instrument clarity
Item sampling
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
7
Major Types of Measures
Generic
Specific
Static
Adaptive
Reflective scales
Formative indexes
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
8
Measurement Taxonomy
Four measurement property domains
Cross-sectional domains
Reliability
Validity
Longitudinal measurement domains
Reliability of change scores
Responsiveness
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
9
Measurement and Statistics
Correlation coefficients
Correlation coefficients indicate direction and magnitude of relationships between variables.
Pearson's r
Range:
From −1.00 (perfect negative correlation)
Through 0.00 (no correlation)
To +1.00 (perfect positive correlation)
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
10
Reliability #1
Consistency—the absence of variation in measuring a stable attribute for an individual
Reliability assessments involve computing a reliability coefficient
Most reliability coefficients are based on correlation coefficients.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
11
Question #2
Tell whether the following statement is true or false:
Reliability coefficients usually range from .00 to 1.00, with higher values reflecting less reliability.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Answer to Question #2
False
Reliability coefficients usually range from .00 to 1.00, with higher values reflecting greater reliability, not less reliability.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Reliability #2
Replication approaches
Test–retest reliability: administration of the same measure to the same people on two occasions
Interrater reliability: measurements by two or more observers or raters using the same instrument or measurements by the same observer or rater on two or more occasions
Parallel test reliability: measurements of the same attribute using alternate versions of the same instrument, with the same people
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
14
Reliability Coefficient (R)
Represent the proportion of true variability to obtained variability:
R = VT Vo
Should be at least .70; .80 preferable
Can be improved by making instrument longer (adding items)
Are lower in homogeneous than in heterogeneous samples
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
15
Internal Consistency
The extent to which all the instrument’s items are measuring the same attribute
Evaluated by administering the instrument on one occasion
Appropriate for most multi-item instruments
Most widely used evaluation method is the coefficient alpha
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
16
Measurement Error
Unless a reliability coefficient is 1.0 (virtually never happens), measurement error is present.
Used to estimate the range within which the true score lies
Standard error of measurement (SEM)
Limits of agreement (LOA)
Measurement error is routinely estimated for multi-item measures developed with item response theory (IRT) methods.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
17
Validity
The degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure (resilience)
Four aspects of validity
Face validity
Content validity
Criterion-related validity
Construct validity
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
18
Face Validity
Refers to whether the instrument looks as though it is measuring the appropriate construct
Based on judgment, no objective criteria for assessment
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
19
Content Validity
The degree to which an instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct being measured
Relevance
Comprehensiveness
Balance
Evaluated by expert evaluation, via the content validity index (CVI)
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
20
Criterion Validity #1
The degree to which the instrument correlates with an external criterion or “gold standard”
Focal measures
Expense, efficiency, risk and discomfort, criterion unavailable, and prediction
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
21
Criterion Validity #2
Two types of criterion-related validity
Predictive validity: the instrument’s ability to distinguish people whose performance differs on a future criterion
Concurrent validity: the instrument’s ability to distinguish individuals who differ on a present criterion
Specificity, sensitivity
Predictive values
Likelihood ratios
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), area under the curve (AUC)
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
22
Construct Validity
Concerned with the questions
What is this instrument really measuring?
Does it adequately measure the construct of interest?
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
23
Methods of Assessing Construct Validity
Hypothesis-testing validity
Convergent validity
Known-groups validity
Divergent validity (discriminant validity)
Multitrait–multimethod matrix method (MTMM)
Structural validity
Cross-cultural validity
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
24
Reliability of Change Scores
Change score: represents the amount of change between two scores
Difference score: the difference between the randomized groups at posttest
Smallest detectable change (SDC): a change in scores that is beyond measurement error
Reliable change index (RCI): assesses the clinical significance of improvement during a psychotherapeutic intervention
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
25
Responsiveness
The ability of a measure to detect change over time in a construct that has changed, commensurate with the amount of change that has occurred
Whether a change score is truly capturing a real change in the construct
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
26
Question #3
Tell whether the following statement is true or false:
Reliability is the degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Answer to Question #3
False
Validity is the degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure. Reliability is the degree of consistency or accuracy with which an instrument measures an attribute.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Critiquing Data Quality in Quantitative Studies
Can I trust the data in this study?
Are the measurements of key constructs reliable and valid, and are change scores reliable and responsive?
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
29
Psychometric Assessment
Gather evidence
Validity
Reliability
Other assessment criteria
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins