Informed Consent
Data Analysis and Reporting
Chapter 15
Data Management
- Includes coding, cleaning, and organizing data into a usable format (preparing for analysis)
- Coding – assigning labels so data can be read and understood by a computer (e.g., 1=yes, 2=no)
- Cleaning – values are valid and consistent (e.g., 1=true, 2=false, there should be no 3s); Also, need to deal with missing data
Data Analysis
- Begins with being able to identify the variables
- Variables – a characteristic or attribute that can be measured or observed (Creswell, 2002)
- Types of variables: independent (controlled or cause or exert some influence) and dependent (are outcome variables that are being studied)
- Also, the level(s) of data collected are important
- Nominal
- Ordinal
- Numerical (interval and ratio)
Data Analysis (cont.)
- Descriptive statistics – used to organize, summarize and describe characteristics
- Inferential statistics – concerned with relationships and causality to make generalizations about a population based on a sample
- Analyses
- Univariate (1 variable)
- Bivariate (2 variables)
- Multivariate (More than 2 variables)
Examples of Evaluation Questions Answered
Univariate Data Analyses
- One variable at a time
- Summary counts (frequency distributions)
- Measures of central tendency – e.g., mean, median, and mode
- Measures of spread or variation – e.g., range, standard deviation, variance
Bivariate Analyses
- Can be non-statistical comparisons
- Example of non-statistical comparisons (eyeballing the data)
Male Female
Yes 35 62
No 50 46
Bivariate Analyses (cont.)
- Hypotheses
- Null: statement of no significant difference
- Type I error – rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true
- Type II error – failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is not true (accepting a false null hypothesis)
- Level of significance (alpha level) – probability of making a type I error; e.g., p<.01
- Alternative: opposite of the null
- Statistical significance – “refers to whether the observed differences between the two or more groups are real or not, or whether they are chance occurrences” (McDermott & Sarvela, 1999, p. 300)
- Practical significance – measures the meaningfulness of the program regardless of statistical significance
Bivariate Analyses (cont.)
- Statistical tests
- Chi-square (nominal/ordinal data)
- t-test (numerical)
- Dependent (one group twice)
- Independent (two groups once)
- ANOVA (numerical) - means of ≥ 2 groups
- Correlations (numerical) - strength of relationship)
Correlations
positive
negative
greater
Multivariate Data Analyses
- Analyses to study three or more variables
- Multiple regression - predicting by using several variables (numerical)
- Stepwise
- Logistic
- General linear
Application of Data Analyses
- Case #1
Application of Data Analyses (cont.)
- Case #2
Interpreting the Data
- Have objectives been achieved?
- Laws, ideals, regulations, or ethical principles violated?
- Assessed needs reduced?
- What was the value of accomplishments?
- Ask others to provide judgment on failures, strengths, weaknesses
- Compare results to other results
- Compare results to expectations of performance or standards
- Interpret in light of evaluation procedures uses
Evaluation Reporting
- Evaluation report is presented to the stakeholders
- Evaluation report is essential and can provide the following:
- A critical analysis of the results
- A tangible product
- Evidence that program or materials were carefully developed
- A record of the activities
- Assistance to others who may be interested in developing a similar program
- A foundation for evaluation activities in the future
Designing the Written Report
- Abstract or Executive Summary
- Introduction - program description; goals and objectives
- Methods/Procedures
- Results
- Conclusions/Recommendation
Presenting Data
- Tables and graphs can: 1) help illustrate certain findings, 2)make reports easier to read, and 3) understand findings, be self-explanatory
- Use graphic displays that are appropriate for the results
- Horizontal bar charts – focus attention on different categories
- Vertical bar charts – focus attention to change over time
- Cluster bar charts – to contrast one variable from others
- Line graphs – to plot data and show trend data
- Pie charts – to show distribution
How and When to Present the Report
- Planners/evaluators must consider the logistics of presenting the evaluation findings; should be discussed with decision makers
- A few suggestions:
- Give key decision makers advanced information of the findings
- Maintain anonymity of individuals, institutions, and organizations; use sensitivity to avoid judging or labeling; maintain confidentiality according to wishes of administrators; maintain objectivity (Windsor et al., 2004)
- Choose ways of reporting that meet the needs of stakeholders
Increasing the Utilization of the Results
- Plan the study with stakeholders in mind
- If the program changes after the planning stage, so should the evaluation
- Focus the evaluation on conditions about the program that the decision makers can change
- Reports should be written in a clear, simple manner
- The decision on making recommendations should be based on how clear the data are
- Disseminate the results to all stakeholders using a variety of methods
- Integrate the evaluation findings with other research and evaluation about the program
- Provide high-quality research